similar to: [Bug 34] Redirecting udp packets to closed port gives bad icmp error

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 Summary: Redirecting udp packets to closed port gives bad icmp error Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bowles@ambisys.com Component|unknown |ip_tables (kernel) OS/Version|other

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 10:55 ------- This looks strange. The BUG in slab.c tells us that there is a GFP_ATOMIC missing. This means that we are allocating kernel memory from softirq context with only GFP_KERNEL. If I understand your backtrace correctly, what happens is: - you are

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568 Summary: iptables-save saves option hashlimit-htable-gcinterval with error Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables-save AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 08:39 ------- what patches from patch-o-matic do you use? Do you know how to reproduce this behaviour? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:14 ------- did you load iptable_nat at the time the problem with wrong-destip does happen? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-30 21:29 ------- I can confirm this bug, it

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:52 ------- Incompatible solutions:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-22 20:46 ------- Could you please try to strace your iptables and see if there is some error during the gesockopt/setsockopt system call when the erroneous counter values are returned? Thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=481 ------- Additional Comments From joseba.beltran@gmail.com 2006-05-31 19:09 MET ------- Many pptp nat helper users are suffering this problem: http://www.chillispot.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4118&highlight=pptp http://www.chillispot.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=958&highlight=pptp

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 Summary: ipt_account reports: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2063 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566 Summary: Snapshot does not contain any file Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All URL: http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/snapshot/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-04-28 08:25 ------- The misnomer is true. I

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39 beo@sgs.o.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |beo@sgs.o.se Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:02 ------- This is a really hard

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2003-06-16 00:38 ------- problem seems to be a dropped reference in remove_expectations, can be reproduced by unloading ip_conntrack after unloading a helper which is helping a connection. Attached patch fixes my problems. ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=536 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-28 02:35 MET ------- I can reproduce this, but

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:51 MET ------- In the DCC Specifcication