Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[#8687] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods."
2007 Apr 11
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org>
Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31
Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed
yielding methods.
To: noreply at rubyforge.org
Bugs item #8687, was opened at 2007-02-15 17:29
You can respond by visiting:
2007 Sep 21
5
Stubbing yielding methods
I''ve just been tying my brain in knots looking at bug #8687 (
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=8687&group_id=1917&atid=7477
).
I''ve been (1) trying to work out whether there is anything logically wrong
with Mocha''s existing behaviour and (2) whether Mocha should support the
requested functionality.
It all centres around the use of the
2008 Jan 20
2
Bug #17118 - expectations should take precedence over stubs
I wanted to draw attention to this bug report [A] which highlights a change
that was made between Mocha 0.4 and 0.5.
It may have lead to tests which pass unexpectedly. Does my explanation
(below) make sense to people?
It feels like we should at least add some warnings to the documentation.
You are correct that this behaviour did change between Mocha v0.4.0 and
> v0.5.0 (in revision 115).
2006 Dec 15
0
Fwd: Re: [HOWTO] Edgemocha
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Mead <jamesmead44 at gmail.com>
Date: 15-Dec-2006 11:54
Subject: Re: [HOWTO] Edgemocha
To: ruby-talk at ruby-lang.org
On 15/12/06, jpywtora at calpoly.edu <jpywtora at calpoly.edu> wrote:
> http://ruby-talk.blogspot.com/2006/12/get-edge-that-is-edgemocha.html
>
> All the mocha talk pushed me to the edge ;-)
> Hope it is
2006 Sep 29
1
yielding consecutive values
I''m not sure if someone has already addressed this issue, but if not,
here goes.
I need the following behavior:
def test_generate(documentation = ''/test_documentation/'',
destination = ''/destination/'')
yield_results = [''/'', ''filename.yaml'', ''blah.xml'']
2007 Jul 30
6
Object.stubs doesn''t seem to work.
Hi
I''m using Mocha 0.5.3 and I want to stub out a call to Time.now, just
like the example in the post
http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/06/08/mocha-0-5-released
However, trying it in irb gets me the following error:
>> require ''mocha''
=> true
>> Time.stubs(:now).returns(Time.parse(''Thu Feb 01 00:00:00 UTC 2007''))
NoMethodError:
2007 Apr 11
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Feature Requests-5856 ] Stubbing of private methods should be allowed
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org>
Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31
Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-5856 ] Stubbing of private methods should
be allowed
To: noreply at rubyforge.org
Feature Requests item #5856, was opened at 2006-09-22 17:03
You can respond by visiting:
2008 Jan 02
2
Proxies
I really like the idea of Mock Proxies as explained in Brian Takita''s post here:
http://pivots.pivotallabs.com/users/brian/blog/articles/352-introducing-rr
I posted to this list eariler with an incomplete implementation of
.stops_mocking in the thread "Mocking Time, delegating to original
object." The Mock Proxy pattern would make this simpler.
2007 Dec 23
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-16523 ] Ruby 1.9 gives warning
FYI - I''ve just released Mocha 0.5.6 to make Ruby 1.9 compatibility
fixes available for those using released packages rather than
subversion trunk. I''m not feeling well and so haven''t been able to
test it other than by running all the tests using Ruby 1.9. Please let
me know if you have any problems using it. Remember that it sometimes
takes a while for a new gem
2006 Dec 15
0
Fwd: Re: Re: [HOWTO] Edgemocha
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Mead <jamesmead44 at gmail.com>
Date: 15-Dec-2006 17:37
Subject: Re: Re: [HOWTO] Edgemocha
To: John Pywtorak <jpywtora at calpoly.edu>
On 15/12/06, John Pywtorak <jpywtora at calpoly.edu> wrote:
> Compare
> ~$ sudo gem install mocha
> Attempting local installation of ''mocha''
> Successfully
2007 Oct 07
0
Supressing RDoc links
I recently noticed some anomalies in the Mocha RDoc. Within a method RDoc
comment, any word that happens to be the same as a method in the same class
gets turned into a link. You can see an example [2] with the word "once" and
another [3] with the words "yields", "times" and "with".
Does anyone know how to stop these words incorrectly being made into
2007 Jan 24
0
Mocha 0.4 released
So I finally got round to releasing a new
version<http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=1917&release_id=9184>of
Mocha <http://mocha.rubyforge.org/>. Much of the functionality has been
available for some time if you''ve been using the Rails plugin based on
subversion HEAD, but now you can get it in all in a gem (or other package).
The most recent changes centre around allowing
2007 Sep 11
1
Fwd: [ mocha-Feature Requests-13763 ] add with_any_arguments method
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org>
Date: 7 Sep 2007 22:43
Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-13763 ] add with_any_arguments method
To: noreply at rubyforge.org
Feature Requests item #13763, was opened at 2007-09-07 17:43
You can respond by visiting:
2007 Mar 09
0
Fwd: Mocha raise exception first call, return value second call
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Mead <jamesmead44 at gmail.com>
Date: 07-Mar-2007 10:04
Subject: Re: Mocha raise exception first call, return value second call
To: ruby-talk at ruby-lang.org
On 07/03/07, Raymond O''Connor <nappin713 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to have mocha raise an exception the first time an stub
> is called, and then
2007 Oct 15
0
Fwd: Content filtered message notification
I''m not sure why mailman bounced your message (perhaps because you are not
subscribed to the mailing list), but I''m glad you have solved your problem.
Cheers, James.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: mailman-bounces at rubyforge.org <mailman-bounces at rubyforge.org>
Date: 14 Oct 2007 17:21
Subject: Content filtered message notification
To:
2006 Sep 03
0
Reducing object polution and mocha?
Hi Kevin,
Not currently, I''m afraid - I always realised it was a possible problem, but
we haven''t run into it in our use of Mocha so far. I guess you''re pushing
the envelope with it, which is great.
If you only need to do it for one or two objects, you could just undefine
the offending methods. In the meantime I''ll look into a better solution. It
may not be
2007 Jul 04
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-12001 ] Method call count is not reported correctly on error
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org>
Date: 04-Jul-2007 19:21
Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-12001 ] Method call count is not reported
correctly on error
To: noreply at rubyforge.org
Bugs item #12001, was opened at 2007-07-04 15:21
You can respond by visiting:
2007 Jul 04
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-11885 ] never doesn''t work with stub_everything
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org>
Date: 30-Jun-2007 14:33
Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-11885 ] never doesn''t work with stub_everything
To: noreply at rubyforge.org
Bugs item #11885, was opened at 2007-06-27 14:13
You can respond by visiting:
2007 Apr 11
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-6416 ] Mock objects shouldn''t define #to_s
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org>
Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:07
Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-6416 ] Mock objects shouldn''t define #to_s
To: noreply at rubyforge.org
Bugs item #6416, was opened at 2006-10-31 15:34
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7477&aid=6416&group_id=1917
2006 Dec 02
0
Fwd: Re: Mocha and ActiveRecord
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: J. B. Rainsberger <jbrains762 at gmail.com>
Date: 02-Dec-2006 02:48
Subject: Re: Mocha and ActiveRecord
To: ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk at ruby-lang.org>
James Mead wrote:
> On 28/11/06, J. B. Rainsberger <jbrains762 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Suppose I have an Order, which has_many OrderItems. Suppose I want to
>>