similar to: Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-16523 ] Ruby 1.9 gives warning

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-16523 ] Ruby 1.9 gives warning"

2007 Apr 11
1
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:24 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #5892, was opened at 2006-09-25 07:49 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Apr 11
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-6416 ] Mock objects shouldn''t define #to_s
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:07 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-6416 ] Mock objects shouldn''t define #to_s To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #6416, was opened at 2006-10-31 15:34 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7477&aid=6416&group_id=1917
2007 Apr 11
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods. To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #8687, was opened at 2007-02-15 17:29 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Jul 04
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-11885 ] never doesn''t work with stub_everything
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 30-Jun-2007 14:33 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-11885 ] never doesn''t work with stub_everything To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #11885, was opened at 2007-06-27 14:13 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Feb 02
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-7834 ] infinte_range.rb makes incorrect assumption about to_f
Thanks for reporting the bug below. You''re absolutely right. Renamed Range#to_s implementation to #mocha_inspect and checked first and last respond_to?(:to_f) as you suggested. Sorry for the delay - I wasn''t monitoring the rubyforge trackers. I am now! Should be fixed in revision 99 of trunk. -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From:
2010 Jan 18
1
binarylogic-searchlogic ~> 2.0 binarylogic-authlogic mbleigh-subdomain_fu
I am having problem starting my app, here''s the error message, i am running Ubuntu 9.04 with Apache with Passenger: The application has exited during startup (i.e. during the evaluation of config/environment.rb). The error message can be found below. To solve this problem, please follow any instructions in the error message. Error message: Missing these required gems:
2007 Dec 20
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Patches-16424 ] Ruby 1.9 Compatibility
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 20 Dec 2007 15:48 Subject: [ mocha-Patches-16424 ] Ruby 1.9 Compatibility To: noreply at rubyforge.org Patches item #16424, was opened at 2007-12-19 02:43 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7479&aid=16424&group_id=1917 Category: None
2007 Jun 15
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Patches-11583 ] Mocha 0.5.0 throwing unexpected warnings, one line patch included
Begin forwarded message: > From: <noreply at rubyforge.org> > Date: 15 June 2007 10:44:07 BDT > To: noreply at rubyforge.org > Subject: [ mocha-Patches-11583 ] Mocha 0.5.0 throwing unexpected > warnings, one line patch included > > Patches item #11583, was opened at 2007-06-14 21:28 > You can respond by visiting: > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/? >
2007 Apr 11
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Feature Requests-5856 ] Stubbing of private methods should be allowed
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-5856 ] Stubbing of private methods should be allowed To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #5856, was opened at 2006-09-22 17:03 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Oct 25
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Feature Requests-15021 ] without or not params matcher
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 25 Oct 2007 14:01 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-15021 ] without or not params matcher To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #15021, was opened at 2007-10-24 15:33 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Apr 11
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Feature Requests-7119 ] ability to specify call order
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:39 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-7119 ] ability to specify call order To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #7119, was opened at 2006-12-06 00:30 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Jul 04
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-12001 ] Method call count is not reported correctly on error
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 04-Jul-2007 19:21 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-12001 ] Method call count is not reported correctly on error To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #12001, was opened at 2007-07-04 15:21 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Mar 04
4
Rails functional testing and Mocha
I''ve always wanted to be able to do stuff like this in my functional tests c = customers(:customer_1) c.expects(:great_customer_service) post :service_customer, :id => c.id This of course fails because inside the rails action a different instance of customer is used. Some of the time setting your expectation/stubbing on Customer.any_instance works, but it''s not
2007 Sep 11
1
Fwd: [ mocha-Feature Requests-13763 ] add with_any_arguments method
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 7 Sep 2007 22:43 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-13763 ] add with_any_arguments method To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #13763, was opened at 2007-09-07 17:43 You can respond by visiting:
2007 Aug 08
1
Mocking Time, delegating to original object
In my Unit tests, I run into the all-too-common problem of Time.expects(:now) being called by Benchmark before the method is unmocked. Instead of messing around with the teardown order, I decided to modify the Expectation with a new method, .stops_mocking. Here are the changes I use, including a few monkey patches to push relevant objects down to where I want them, all wrapped up in a big ugly
2007 Jan 17
8
Mocha Mock''s hanging on after test run?
Hi guys, I''m running mocha (0.3.2) against Rails core and just found an issue where the mock doesn''t go away after the test is run. For example: def test_reset_bang_doesn_reinstall_named_routes ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.expects(:install).never @session.reset! end def test_zzz puts ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.inspect
2006 Sep 22
2
foo.expects(:blah).returns(10).then(11) syntax
I recently needed the behavior of my object to change on subsequent method calls so I added the syntax above. Here''s the diff of changes I made: Index: test/mocha/expectation_test.rb =================================================================== --- test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (revision 854) +++ test/mocha/expectation_test.rb (working copy) @@ -95,6 +95,12 @@
2006 Sep 11
1
Aliasing type method in Mocha
Hi, (Mocha and Stubba are great, btw.) Is there any way to alias the call to .type in Mocha? The issue is that AR effectively aliases the normal type method for the Column class (for whatever Adapter.) My code is reflecting on the adapter methods to iterate over the columns in a particular model. This makes it hard to write test code that stubs out columns and mocks my models. E.g. cols =
2006 Dec 14
1
Patch: make rdoc of lib/mocha/object.rb instead of lib/stubba/object.rb
Index: Rakefile =================================================================== --- Rakefile (revision 73) +++ Rakefile (working copy) @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ task.rdoc_dir = ''doc'' task.template = "html_with_google_analytics" task.options << "--line-numbers" << "--inline-source" -
2015 Jun 29
2
CPAN issues
Hello List, Running CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core), and trying to update CPAN from version 1.98 to version 2.10, but it fails. <snip> t/97-process_setup_options.t .. ok t/97-return_values.t .......... 6/10 # Failed test 'blib/script/cpan -j t/97-lib_cpan1/CPAN/Config.pm Local::Prereq::Fails' # at t/97-return_values.t line 49. # got: '2' # expected: