similar to: Sticky bit problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Sticky bit problem"

2016 May 18
2
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
> On May 18, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote: >> We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like: >>
2016 May 18
2
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like: drwxrws---+ 9 myapp 9997 2048 May 16 17:38 . It's owned by user "myapp" and GID 9997 and as you can see we have the SGID bit set on this
2018 Mar 05
2
SAMBA4 Fileserver & Disk Quota
I tried this. When im creating a folder directly on server, the sticky bit is working. But it does not work when im doing it from windows. # ls -l drwxrws---+ 7 root stickygroup 4096 Mär 5 14:44 00_stickygroup/ Best regards Micha Am 05.03.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Michael Wandel: > IMHO you can use the posix sgid bit.
2010 Jul 09
2
difference between stickybit SUID and SGID
i had a small query , whant is the difference between stickybit SUID and SGID , is there any proper site where i can get a clear understanding . -- Regards Agnello D'souza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100709/c7c22588/attachment.html>
2002 Oct 28
2
Fwd: rsync and unlink permission
Hello list, I have a apache documentroot with ownership root.www-data and mode 755 Now I have a /var/www/index.html and chown'd that file to user "foo". Sincen "foo" has no write permission under /var/www, he cannot rsync from remote server to the local filesystem because rsync will try to make temp file and unlink the original file before writing over it. Is there any
2011 Jun 21
4
Using umask
Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory attributes is becoming a pain. I understand the fundamentals of the file attributes, though from time to time I have to review the "sticky bit"; what I do not understand is where/how the
2007 Mar 03
1
sticky windows and rotate focus
Hi everyone, One thing that has always annoyed me about compiz is how rotate handles sticky windows. If you have a sticky window on your desktop, it will usually (always?) get focus when you rotate to a different face on the cube. This happens even when other windows have been focused more recently on the face you rotate to. This seems like silly behaviour, because sticky windows are (for me)
2009 Aug 18
3
'inherit owner' doesn't play nice with 'force directory mode'
Hello I am trying to create a 'dropbox' share, using the sticky bit and 'inherit owner'. By themselves they work, but when a directory is created in this share, its permissions are not quite what I need. Therefore, I try to use 'force directory mode' or 'inherit permissions'. However, whenever I do that, the owner on the newly-created directory is no longer correct
2002 Oct 30
1
sticky bit, etc.
I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the following configuration: [documents] comment = documents path = /shares/documents public = no writeable = yes printable = no valid users = @lan1 force user = docadmin force group = lan1 create mode = 0440 force create mode = 0440 directory mode = 1770 force directory mode = 1770 delete read only = no
2007 Feb 05
2
application 'allway sync' evades sticky bit?!
Hi, am running: Redhat EL4.4 i386, Samba 3.0.23d from Sernet, ext3 fs Samba as PDC Someone's got the idea to have one big share with access managed by directory's sticky bit. This works perfectly well when normal XP or W2k clients work with their explorer. But: With 'allway sync', an app to synchronize for example between laptop and fileserver the program is somehow able to
2008 Sep 15
2
Tmp directory and sticky
I noticed after my install that the tmp directory was A- not a sticky B- still executable I went and changed etc/fstab to add loop,noexec,nosuid,rw, which I hope is the right thing to do. I rebooted and it looks like it worked. When doing an ls -l on the main directory, the tmp folder lit up all green in putty (cool, I hope) But the chmods I did with winscp will not take effect (they do on
2007 May 27
2
[PATCH] add 'sticky' mode to cube to allow sticky+not-on-bottom windows to stick to the screen when the screen is transformed
I've attached the patch since I don't yet have an easy way to make git format-patch and kmail play nice together. The basic idea is during a rotate/other cube transform, 'sticky' windows stick to the screen instead of being redrawn once per face (its an option, the default is the old behaviour) Consider this, please, essentially an RFC - this particular behaviour was
2014 Mar 24
1
mount.cifs permissions for non-root user via sudo
I'm not sure this is the proper forum to post to, but I hope someone can point me in the right direction if not have the answers. We have a RedHat Enterprise 5 AS machine, fully patched, with the most recent samba RPMs installed. The machine is joined to Active Directory via a 3rd party program called Centrify. An AD user, when logged into this system, is given permission to run /bin/mount via
2003 Nov 04
1
ACL + sticky bit
Lo folks, I got a little question. Ive set up samba 3.0.0 + RH 8. And since ACL within samba only works on share niveau i wanted to implement POSIX ACL. I was thinking what is the difference between "full" access and "change" on a NT4 server. As far as i could think the difference is that "full" acces can delete a file and "change" can only change it. So i
2006 Nov 07
4
"Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset
Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I've noticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number
2002 Jun 13
2
Samba versus Dreamweaver
Hi! I hope someone can help me with this one: We're using Macromedia Dreamweaver 3 to publish local files from a NT4 Server to our internet server running Redhat 7.3 / Samba 2.2.3a. Life could be so sweet but we're facing a strange problem: Users can't _overwrite_ files edited by other users. Everytime someone tries to overwrite such a file the message "An error occurred -
2013 Feb 20
1
Sticky results
Hi there, I have a xapian index whose results are being sorted by a value, with (PHP bindings): $enquire->set_sort_by_value($sort_data_value); This is because I want the results returned in chronological order of publication date. However, I now have a need to have certain results be 'sticky' at the top of the resultset, regardless of their publication date. Obviously there are
2006 Jun 02
2
Sticky Options to Find?
Is there a way to provide "sticky" options to ActiveRecord::Base::Find ? I''m thinking something with a use model like: class Function < ActiveRecord::Base sticky :conditions => "lft > 0", :order => "lft ASC" end Where all subsuquent find operations have those options applied. In this case: Function.find(:all) Would actually be equivalent
2014 Aug 13
1
acl sticky bit?
Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile:
2011 Feb 18
1
load_usershare_shares: is not owned by root or does not have the sticky bit 't'
Dear I encounter this error on Samba 3.0.28a, i would like to know how to fix it, The file is owned by root, i don't understand whats going wrong... smbd[15232]: [2011/02/18 16:32:22, 0] param/loadparm.c:load_usershare_shares(4878) Feb 18 16:32:22 virtualbox smbd[15232]: load_usershare_shares: directory /var/lib/samba/usershares/data is not owned by root or does not have the sticky bit