similar to: Promote samba-3 BDC to PDC

Hello, I'm still testing Samba with security=ads. Everything runs fine atm., but when I logon I'm getting this in pc's log: [2009/05/07 13:17:58, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(406) Allowed connection from (10.255.255.7) [2009/05/07 13:17:58, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(406) Allowed connection from (10.255.255.7) [2009/05/07 13:17:58, 1]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm in the progress of setting up clustered samba with ctdb. Samba is ADS-member server. WINS server is configured on two of our 2003-servers. When samba runs for a couple of hours I checked the WINS servers and saw that samba/nmbd registrred only the private interface addresses (192.168.1.x) and not the public interfaces (10.0.0.41,42).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, currently I'm testing samba authenticating against ADS. Samba is joined to that domain, getent passwd and wbinfo -u works as expected, but when I try to ssh to the samba server with an account in AD it failes. I've turned debug on for pam_winbind.so in /etc/pam.d/system-auth. When I try to connect I get the following in /var/log/secure

Hi, I have just observed the following issue and I would like to ask if it is already known: I''m using zones on ZFS filesystems which were cloned from a common template (which is itself an original filesystem). A couple of weeks ago, I did a pkg image-update, so all zone roots got cloned again and the new zone roots got promoted. I then decided to undo the update and promoted the

Hello, Is there a way to generate LLVM IR without constant expressions by promoting constant expressions to registers? e.g.: %tmp1 = tail call i8* @foo(i8* bitcast (i32* @x to i8*), i8* %tmp, i64 4) #1 would be converted to: %tmp1 = bitcast i32* @x to i8* %tmp2 = tail call i8* @foo(i8* %tmp1, i8* %tmp, i64 4) #1 I find quite inconvenient and redundant to maintain constant expressions when

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi all, > > We'd like to promote the AArch64 backend to being built by default. I > know it's very soon after the initial upload, but we think the backend > is in a good position and should be stable. > > We'd very much like to get it tested in more diverse environments >

On 31 January 2013 12:45, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > This to me says that the concerns and protections of the experimental > backend aren't needed, and are more likely to impede progress than help it > -- specifically, we won't get good build bot coverage and diverse host > compiler coverage until it's enabled. > +1 --renato

Just FYI: the AArch64 tests fail on non-Linux platforms. On my Mac, I get 75 failures running 'ninja check', since the tests do not specify a triple and defaults to Darwin, which the backend rejects in createTLOF. I would expect the same behavior on Windows. On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 31 January 2013 12:45, Chandler

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. I understand the following could be considered a little off topic on this list, so please forgive me. Our company is considering to promote an european funded research project, which should use wine as one of his major components. We are looking for a research institute within european community willing to be funded for doing the research

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:09:58PM -0400, Francois Pichet wrote: > On my target store/load of f32 or i32 are equivalents. > Previously I had duplicate instructions def in .td to map f32 and i32 to > the same opcode. > > I deleted all that and I instead tried a new approach (to simplify things) : > > setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::f32, Promote); >

On 26/05/16 21:03, Miso Rapajić wrote: > Hello everyone > > > I have successfully deployed samba 4.4.2 on Centos7 as PDC. I take it you mean 'DC' instead of 'PDC' > I had to use > BIND9_DLZ because samba_internal was not working. Why didn't the internal dns work, it should. > I have successfully > joined win7 machine to a domain and with RSAT I can

Greetings, I have a DC that is having issues replicating DomainDnsZones to my other DCs (WERR_DS_DRA_INTERNAL_ERROR). All of the searching I have done indicate a corrupt database. So I am wondering if it is possible to demote that server, delete all contents of the private directory, and then re-promote it to resolve the issue. Does that sound like a reasonable fix and\or is there anything I

Are there any academic papers that promote theora? I know of one, are there more? Universal Multimedia Access and Open Standards <http://www.t4p.no/t4p.no/conference/media/Vaaler.pdf> tom_a_sparks Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. but instead use OpenDocument File Formats or use OpenOffice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument

Ops.Date <- function (e1, e2) { if (nargs() == 1) stop("unary ", .Generic, " not defined for Date objects") boolean <- switch(.Generic, "<" = , ">" = , "==" = , "!=" = , "<=" = , ">=" = TRUE, FALSE) if (!boolean) stop(.Generic, " not defined for Date

Has anyone attempted to demote a windows 2000 server and have it rejoin the same domain, but as a member of a Samba PDC? Thank you

Hi all, I was wondering what was promote element pass doing ? It seems that it has been turned on by default in llc since LLVM 3.1 and it exposes a lot of BUG for ARM target. Not sure those are ARM backend bugs or promote elements bugs. However ARM BUGS are not release blockers, it is a significant regression versus LLVM 3.0. Can this be disabled by default for ARM target ? Best Regards Seb

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:23:58PM -0700, James Salsman wrote: >> >> Apparently, on Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (which is based on Sarge, > > Wrong. Ubuntu LTS is not maintained by Debian. Please use the Ubuntu BTS > for problems with its packages. I understand that Ubuntu is not maintained by Debian, but it is based on it.

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:09:58PM -0400, Francois Pichet wrote: > > On my target store/load of f32 or i32 are equivalents. > > Previously I had duplicate instructions def in .td to map f32 and i32 to > > the same opcode. > > > > I deleted all that and I instead tried a new approach

On my target store/load of f32 or i32 are equivalents. Previously I had duplicate instructions def in .td to map f32 and i32 to the same opcode. I deleted all that and I instead tried a new approach (to simplify things) : setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::f32, Promote); AddPromotedToType(ISD::STORE, MVT::f32, MVT::i32); setOperationAction(ISD::LOAD, MVT::f32, Promote);

On Jan 31, 2013, at 4:37 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We'd like to promote the AArch64 backend to being built by default. I > know it's very soon after the initial upload, but we think the backend > is in a good position and should be stable. > > We'd very much like to get it tested in more diverse environments >