similar to: Delay of group membership modifications

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Delay of group membership modifications"

2007 Jun 21
1
Recycle bin and ACL
Hello, we are using the vfs module recycle with the following config: vfs objects = recycle recycle: repository = .Papierkorb recycle:directory_mode = 0777 recycle:subdir_mode = 0777 recycle: keeptree = Yes recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb recycle: exclude_dir = tmp recycle:versions = Yes Problem is that everybody can see deleted documents in the recycle bin. But if I set
2006 Aug 17
0
Removing Everyone access on Samba shares
Hi list, My setup: Debian etch (ext3 with acl) with Samba 3.0.22, kerberos5, winbind. Samba box added to a Windows 2003 Domain. Winbind works as expected. It is possible to use domain accounts to access the shares. What I wonder is how to remove the Everyone and Domain Users entries in the Security Tab in Windows. As I understand it. Everyone always show because of the POSIX
2018 Jul 23
2
Undeletable objects in AD
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 13:12:42 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:02:45 +0200 > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Yes, the objects in question are displayed, one of them looks like > > this: > > > > # record 46 > > dn: > >
2016 Mar 23
1
Samba 4 with sssd - primary Windows group membership not honored
> > Can you check if this file exists: > /usr/local/samba/lib/security/pam_winbind.so For historical reasons, I used a prefix of /opt/samba when I compiled: [root at smbfs1 shares]# ls -al /opt/samba/lib/security/pam_winbind.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 63837 Mar 17 19:54 /opt/samba/lib/security/pam_winbind.so relevant config lines in case they are helpful: [global] lock directory =
2018 Jul 23
4
Undeletable objects in AD
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:27:38 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > How are you searching and what with ? I used the ADUC tool and LDAPAdmin. > > Have you tried ldbedit ? > > ldbedit -e <your favourite editor> -H /path/to/sam.ldb > > This will display everything in the editor and you can then search in > that for the groups. You
2016 May 11
3
access to files continues after removing user from group
Hello all, I've noticed that removing a user from a group in /etc/group does not immediately prevent the user from accessing files / directories which the group still has access to. For example, say user 'cwseyst2' only has access to access to 'plc' if it is in group 'plc-staff'. # getfacl plc # file: plc # owner: smbadmin # group: smbadmin user::rwx group::rwx
2005 Dec 30
2
I have problem and/or not fully underestand rails --svn
I experimented with rails --svn option. I use following commands 1 $ su root "mkdir -p /var/lib/svn/projekt; chown radek:radek /var/lib/svn/projekt" 2 Password:heslo roota 3 $ svnadmin create /var/lib/svn/projekt 4 $ mkdir -p /tmp/projekt/trunk 5 $ svn import -m "Creating empty project projekt" /tmp/projekt file:///var/lib/svn/projekt 6 //var/lib/svn/pokus 7
2023 Mar 28
1
windows acls
On 28/03/2023 15:08, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 3/28/23 01:33, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 28/03/2023 01:59, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: >>> I am having troubles with windows ACLs.? I have been following the >>> wiki >>> (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs) and must have messed
2004 Apr 17
1
Bug in "force group" parameter, or group membership checking?
Hello, I have the following situation: Samba with ldap passdb backend. In my setup I have a group called exact: ------------ dn: cn=exact,ou=Groups,dc=ahm,dc=nl objectClass: posixGroup,sambaGroupMapping cn: exact gidNumber: 1000 sambaSID: S-1-5-21-4269728302-1655870493-3894479995-3001 sambaGroupType: 4 memberUid: gerrit,piet,hornie ------------ maps to the unix group exact: exact
2004 Feb 28
3
Neues über die deutsche Übersetzung der Samba-3-Dokumentation -- News for the german translation of the Samba-3-docs
Another posting in german, due to its subject, which has to do with the german translation of the Samba-3.0-documentation. --- Hallo, deutschsprachige Samba-user, die ?bersetzung der Samba-3-Dokumentation geht weiter. Die Info-Kampagne tr?gt Fr?chte, es gibt neue freiwillige Mitarbeiter! Unsere Projektseite liegt auf Berlios, eine kurze Projektbeschreibung findet man unter
2016 Mar 23
2
Samba 4 with sssd - primary Windows group membership not honored
> > OK, you should use the standard 'rwx' permissions *or* ACLs, not both. If > you create a directory on Unix that you want to share, set the owner:group > to root:'Domain Admins' and permissions to 0770. You will then be able to > set the permissions from windows or with setfacl on the Unix machine, you > do not need the 'force group' lines in smb.conf,
2018 Jul 23
0
Undeletable objects in AD
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 15:01:19 +0200 Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 13:12:42 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:02:45 +0200 > > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, the objects in question are
2023 Mar 28
2
windows acls
On 28/03/2023 17:41, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 3/28/23 08:40, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 28/03/2023 15:50, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 3/28/23 07:36, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28/03/2023 15:08, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: >>>>>
2007 May 01
2
3.0.24 and disappearing ACL entries
I've been working at this for a few days now and I can't figure out what is broken. Google turns up similar issues from years back, but I hope this is a bug resurfacing. ACL entries are being deleted when files are saved. Here is an example: username: user1 group membership: Domain Users directory: /share/test file: test.xls getfacl /share # file: share # owner: DOMAIN+backupuser #
2015 Mar 10
1
Linux fs ACL ignored for Samba4 share in Windows?
On 10/03/15 10:01, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 10/03/15 09:51, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote: >> This command lists all directories in iss_num. However the . (iss_num >> itself) has drwxrwxr-x >> >> Now for the incriminating file example that shows abnormal ACL in >> Windows: the file resides in iss_num/am/uz and has -rwxrwxrwx >> >> So there is no + in
2014 Dec 30
1
Odd Samba/btrfs AD member server problem - SOLVED
On 12/29/2014 11:09 PM, Moby wrote: > > On 12/29/2014 07:34 PM, Moby wrote: >> openSUSE 13.2 machine with btrfs for / >> Running samba-4.1.14-3.3.x86_64. >> Samba is configured to have the server act as a member server in a >> Windows Activedirectory domain. >> wbinfo -u and getent passwd work fine. getent passwd shows local and >> domain users.
2020 Apr 14
1
Fwd: ACL problem
Hi My lab setup: A windows server 2019, configured as PDC called X A windows 10 pro workstation, domain member called Y An Ubuntu 18 server w Samba 4.7, configured as a member server called Z All are KVM virtual machines on a single host. IP and DNS works fine between all. Sharing setup on Samba Personal home shares in /User, configured in the AD profiles as home directories
2014 Dec 30
2
Odd Samba/btrfs AD member server problem
openSUSE 13.2 machine with btrfs for / Running samba-4.1.14-3.3.x86_64. Samba is configured to have the server act as a member server in a Windows Activedirectory domain. wbinfo -u and getent passwd work fine. getent passwd shows local and domain users. However, setfacl -n -R -m u:userX:rwx /testpath fails if userX is a domain user, but succeeds if userX is a local user. Using different
2015 Jun 17
0
samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: woensdag 17 juni 2015 10:54 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks >error/bugged? ( but it all works ok) > >On 17/06/15 08:15, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >>
2015 Aug 07
0
Problems with administrator account
On 07/08/15 14:07, Aurélien Blachet wrote: > I guess you want getent group, so i give you both. But administrator is the only user of "domain admin" group with problems. OOPS, yes 'getent group Domain\ Admins' > [root at fileserver ~]# getent passwd Domain\ Admins > [root at fileserver ~]# getent group Domain\ Admins > domain admins:x:512: > > [root at