thr3ads.net - samba - [Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok) [Jun 2015]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

L.P.H. van Belle

2015-Jun-17 07:15 UTC

[Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

Hai, 
?
im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. 
?
when i run : 
samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator 
?
im getting : 
ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL 
O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
and it tells me it should be
O:DAG:DAD:P?
(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
?
the only difference : O:DAG:DAD:PAI?? <> ?O:DAG:DAD:P 
?
the strange thing.? it complains about?
something.else.tld\Policies\{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}
?
checked the rights. 
getfacl \{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A\}/
?
# file: {EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}/
# owner: domain\040admins
# group: domain\040admins
user::rwx
user:3000002:rwx
user:3000003:r-x
user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
user:3000010:r-x
group::rwx
group:3000002:rwx
group:3000003:r-x
group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
group:domain\040admins:rwx
group:3000010:r-x
mask::rwx
other::---
default:user::rwx
default:user:3000002:rwx
default:user:3000003:r-x
default:user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
default:user:domain\040admins:rwx
default:user:3000010:r-x
default:group::---
default:group:3000002:rwx
default:group:3000003:r-x
default:group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
default:group:domain\040admins:rwx
default:group:3000010:r-x
default:mask::rwx
default:other::---

and on an other folder
?getfacl \{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9\}/
# file: {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/
# owner: domain\040admins
# group: domain\040admins
user::rwx
user:3000002:rwx
user:3000003:r-x
user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
user:3000010:r-x
group::rwx
group:3000002:rwx
group:3000003:r-x
group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
group:domain\040admins:rwx
group:3000010:r-x
mask::rwx
other::---
default:user::rwx
default:user:3000002:rwx
default:user:3000003:r-x
default:user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
default:user:domain\040admins:rwx
default:user:3000010:r-x
default:group::---
default:group:3000002:rwx
default:group:3000003:r-x
default:group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
default:group:domain\040admins:rwx
default:group:3000010:r-x
default:mask::rwx
default:other::---

?
both have same rights, but only 1 is complaining about incorrect setting.. 
?
And this was AFTER? running : 
samba-tool gpo aclcheck
ERROR: Error connecting to 'dc1.something.else.tld' using SMB

samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator
Password for [SOMETHING\Administrator]:
ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL
O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)
(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) on path
(rotterdam.bazuin.nl\Policies\{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}),
should be 
O:DAG:DAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)

did we hit a bug here? i done see whats wrong, and all is working as it should. 
?
Greetz, 
?
Louis
?
?

Rowland Penny

2015-Jun-17 08:53 UTC

head link

[Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

On 17/06/15 08:15, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:> Hai,
>   
> im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian.
>   
> when i run :
> samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator
>   
> im getting :
> ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL
>
O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
> and it tells me it should be
> O:DAG:DAD:P 
(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
>   
> the only difference : O:DAG:DAD:PAI   <>  O:DAG:DAD:P
>   
> the strange thing.  it complains about 
something.else.tld\Policies\{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}
>   
> checked the rights.
> getfacl \{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A\}/
>   
> # file: {EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}/
> # owner: domain\040admins
> # group: domain\040admins
> user::rwx
> user:3000002:rwx
> user:3000003:r-x
> user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
> user:3000010:r-x
> group::rwx
> group:3000002:rwx
> group:3000003:r-x
> group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
> group:domain\040admins:rwx
> group:3000010:r-x
> mask::rwx
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:3000002:rwx
> default:user:3000003:r-x
> default:user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
> default:user:domain\040admins:rwx
> default:user:3000010:r-x
> default:group::---
> default:group:3000002:rwx
> default:group:3000003:r-x
> default:group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
> default:group:domain\040admins:rwx
> default:group:3000010:r-x
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
>
> and on an other folder
>   getfacl \{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9\}/
> # file: {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/
> # owner: domain\040admins
> # group: domain\040admins
> user::rwx
> user:3000002:rwx
> user:3000003:r-x
> user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
> user:3000010:r-x
> group::rwx
> group:3000002:rwx
> group:3000003:r-x
> group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
> group:domain\040admins:rwx
> group:3000010:r-x
> mask::rwx
> other::---
> default:user::rwx
> default:user:3000002:rwx
> default:user:3000003:r-x
> default:user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
> default:user:domain\040admins:rwx
> default:user:3000010:r-x
> default:group::---
> default:group:3000002:rwx
> default:group:3000003:r-x
> default:group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
> default:group:domain\040admins:rwx
> default:group:3000010:r-x
> default:mask::rwx
> default:other::---
>
>   
> both have same rights, but only 1 is complaining about incorrect setting..
>   
> And this was AFTER  running :
> samba-tool gpo aclcheck
> ERROR: Error connecting to 'dc1.something.else.tld' using SMB
>
> samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator
> Password for [SOMETHING\Administrator]:
> ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL
O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)
> (A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) on
path (rotterdam.bazuin.nl\Policies\{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}),
> should be
>
O:DAG:DAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
>
> did we hit a bug here? i done see whats wrong, and all is working as it
should.
>   
> Greetz,
>   
> Louis
>   
>   
Hi Louis,
You have run into something that has been bugging me, the ACE's are 
correct but the owner or dacl flags or wrong, things that I think do not 
really matter as far as windows is concerned.

Have a look here: 
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa379570%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

And here: http://www.netid.washington.edu/documentation/domains/sddl.aspx

My understanding is the ACE's are the things that matter, these are what 
come up in the security tab and who owns the file/dir doesn't really matter.

Rowland

L.P.H. van Belle

2015-Jun-17 09:03 UTC

head link

[Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com 
>[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny
>Verzonden: woensdag 17 juni 2015 10:54
>Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks 
>error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)
>
>On 17/06/15 08:15, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>> Hai,
>>   
>> im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian.
>>   
>> when i run :
>> samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator
>>   
>> im getting :
>> ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL
>> 
>O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A
>;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f0
>1ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
>> and it tells me it should be
>> O:DAG:DAD:P  
>(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001
>f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;O
>ICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
>>   
>> the only difference : O:DAG:DAD:PAI   <>  O:DAG:DAD:P
>>   
>> the strange thing.  it complains about  
>something.else.tld\Policies\{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}
>>   
>> checked the rights.
>> getfacl \{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A\}/
>>   
>> # file: {EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}/
>> # owner: domain\040admins
>> # group: domain\040admins
>> user::rwx
>> user:3000002:rwx
>> user:3000003:r-x
>> user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>> user:3000010:r-x
>> group::rwx
>> group:3000002:rwx
>> group:3000003:r-x
>> group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>> group:domain\040admins:rwx
>> group:3000010:r-x
>> mask::rwx
>> other::---
>> default:user::rwx
>> default:user:3000002:rwx
>> default:user:3000003:r-x
>> default:user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>> default:user:domain\040admins:rwx
>> default:user:3000010:r-x
>> default:group::---
>> default:group:3000002:rwx
>> default:group:3000003:r-x
>> default:group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>> default:group:domain\040admins:rwx
>> default:group:3000010:r-x
>> default:mask::rwx
>> default:other::---
>>
>> and on an other folder
>>   getfacl \{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9\}/
>> # file: {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/
>> # owner: domain\040admins
>> # group: domain\040admins
>> user::rwx
>> user:3000002:rwx
>> user:3000003:r-x
>> user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>> user:3000010:r-x
>> group::rwx
>> group:3000002:rwx
>> group:3000003:r-x
>> group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>> group:domain\040admins:rwx
>> group:3000010:r-x
>> mask::rwx
>> other::---
>> default:user::rwx
>> default:user:3000002:rwx
>> default:user:3000003:r-x
>> default:user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>> default:user:domain\040admins:rwx
>> default:user:3000010:r-x
>> default:group::---
>> default:group:3000002:rwx
>> default:group:3000003:r-x
>> default:group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>> default:group:domain\040admins:rwx
>> default:group:3000010:r-x
>> default:mask::rwx
>> default:other::---
>>
>>   
>> both have same rights, but only 1 is complaining about 
>incorrect setting..
>>   
>> And this was AFTER  running :
>> samba-tool gpo aclcheck
>> ERROR: Error connecting to 'dc1.something.else.tld' using SMB
>>
>> samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator
>> Password for [SOMETHING\Administrator]:
>> ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL 
>O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A
>;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)
>> 
>(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x00120
>0a9;;;ED) on path 
>(rotterdam.bazuin.nl\Policies\{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}),
>> should be
>> 
>O:DAG:DAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;O
>ICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01f
>f;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
>>
>> did we hit a bug here? i done see whats wrong, and all is 
>working as it should.
>>   
>> Greetz,
>>   
>> Louis
>>   
>>   
>
>Hi Louis,
>You have run into something that has been bugging me, the ACE's are 
>correct but the owner or dacl flags or wrong, things that I 
>think do not 
>really matter as far as windows is concerned.
>
>Have a look here: 
>https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa3795
>70%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>
>And here: 
>http://www.netid.washington.edu/documentation/domains/sddl.aspx
>
>My understanding is the ACE's are the things that matter, 
>these are what 
>come up in the security tab and who owns the file/dir doesn't 
>really matter.
>
>Rowland
>-- 
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>
Ah.. yes, i remember, the thiny about windows to be able to set a
"group" as owner/user.

wel as long it works correct,.. 

Thank your for the reply.

Greetz, 

Louis

Rowland Penny

2015-Jun-17 09:15 UTC

head link

[Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

On 17/06/15 10:03, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:>   
>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
>> [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny
>> Verzonden: woensdag 17 juni 2015 10:54
>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks
>> error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)
>>
>> On 17/06/15 08:15, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>>> Hai,
>>>    
>>> im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian.
>>>    
>>> when i run :
>>> samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator
>>>    
>>> im getting :
>>> ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL
>>>
>> O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A
>> ;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f0
>> 1ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
>>> and it tells me it should be
>>> O:DAG:DAD:P
>> (A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001
>> f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;O
>> ICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
>>>    
>>> the only difference : O:DAG:DAD:PAI   <>  O:DAG:DAD:P
>>>    
>>> the strange thing.  it complains about
>> something.else.tld\Policies\{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}
>>>    
>>> checked the rights.
>>> getfacl \{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A\}/
>>>    
>>> # file: {EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}/
>>> # owner: domain\040admins
>>> # group: domain\040admins
>>> user::rwx
>>> user:3000002:rwx
>>> user:3000003:r-x
>>> user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>>> user:3000010:r-x
>>> group::rwx
>>> group:3000002:rwx
>>> group:3000003:r-x
>>> group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>>> group:domain\040admins:rwx
>>> group:3000010:r-x
>>> mask::rwx
>>> other::---
>>> default:user::rwx
>>> default:user:3000002:rwx
>>> default:user:3000003:r-x
>>> default:user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>>> default:user:domain\040admins:rwx
>>> default:user:3000010:r-x
>>> default:group::---
>>> default:group:3000002:rwx
>>> default:group:3000003:r-x
>>> default:group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>>> default:group:domain\040admins:rwx
>>> default:group:3000010:r-x
>>> default:mask::rwx
>>> default:other::---
>>>
>>> and on an other folder
>>>    getfacl \{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9\}/
>>> # file: {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/
>>> # owner: domain\040admins
>>> # group: domain\040admins
>>> user::rwx
>>> user:3000002:rwx
>>> user:3000003:r-x
>>> user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>>> user:3000010:r-x
>>> group::rwx
>>> group:3000002:rwx
>>> group:3000003:r-x
>>> group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>>> group:domain\040admins:rwx
>>> group:3000010:r-x
>>> mask::rwx
>>> other::---
>>> default:user::rwx
>>> default:user:3000002:rwx
>>> default:user:3000003:r-x
>>> default:user:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>>> default:user:domain\040admins:rwx
>>> default:user:3000010:r-x
>>> default:group::---
>>> default:group:3000002:rwx
>>> default:group:3000003:r-x
>>> default:group:enterprise\040admins:rwx
>>> default:group:domain\040admins:rwx
>>> default:group:3000010:r-x
>>> default:mask::rwx
>>> default:other::---
>>>
>>>    
>>> both have same rights, but only 1 is complaining about
>> incorrect setting..
>>>    
>>> And this was AFTER  running :
>>> samba-tool gpo aclcheck
>>> ERROR: Error connecting to 'dc1.something.else.tld' using
SMB
>>>
>>> samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator
>>> Password for [SOMETHING\Administrator]:
>>> ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL
>> O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A
>> ;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)
>> (A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x00120
>> 0a9;;;ED) on path
>> (rotterdam.bazuin.nl\Policies\{EAF212FE-4718-4693-BD18-6B4FC8A0513A}),
>>> should be
>>>
>> O:DAG:DAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;O
>> ICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01f
>> f;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
>>> did we hit a bug here? i done see whats wrong, and all is
>> working as it should.
>>>    
>>> Greetz,
>>>    
>>> Louis
>>>    
>>>    
>> Hi Louis,
>> You have run into something that has been bugging me, the ACE's are
>> correct but the owner or dacl flags or wrong, things that I
>> think do not
>> really matter as far as windows is concerned.
>>
>> Have a look here:
>> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa3795
>> 70%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>>
>> And here:
>> http://www.netid.washington.edu/documentation/domains/sddl.aspx
>>
>> My understanding is the ACE's are the things that matter,
>> these are what
>> come up in the security tab and who owns the file/dir doesn't
>> really matter.
>>
>> Rowland
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>
>>
> Ah.. yes, i remember, the thiny about windows to be able to set a
"group" as owner/user.
>
> wel as long it works correct,..
>
> Thank your for the reply.
>
> Greetz,
>
> Louis
>
Well, as you have found, it is and it isn't :-)

Perhaps you could try what it says here:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc816833%28v=WS.10%29.aspx

There is a link at the bottom of the page to what the default 
permissions should be.

Rowland

Reasonably Related Threads

Search for more possibly parallel threads

samba - Jun 2015 - samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

[Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

[Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

[Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

[Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks error/bugged? ( but it all works ok)

Reasonably Related Threads