similar to: ACLs fail in 3.0.23d

Problem is apparently with locking issues, disabled oplocks in the [general] section, and the problem actually got worse... Here's what happens: User-A part of group1, opens Excel file off of share, saves, exits... User-B (or even User-A for that matter) tries to re-open same file, get error stating it's locked and can only open for read-only access... Both users in the same group, and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I am encountering a problem with Samba and setting acl's for files/directories from the security dialog on my Windows clients. I can easily toggle the file permissions. However, it am not able to add/remove user/groups from the GUI interface on my windows clients. I have also noticed when I add access with setfacl it doesn't not

Winbindd is supposed to have 2 processes running according to the documentation. When I start my samba server (security=ADS), I can see at least 4 Winbindd demons? (A) Is this intended? (B) How can I limit the number of winbindd processes? Kind regards, Jens

Hi all, I had nForce3 motherboard that has broken. Than I bought nForce4 motherboard. I connected old hard disk to this new nForce4 motherboard. For net and sound support I download drivers from nvidia.com site. This driver asks kernel source to be on local disk and gcc compiler. After I installed kernel source and gcc, driver is successfully installed. >From that point (but maybe it is

This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new APIs to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs in

We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote the attached patch. > > We got the logs by forcing smbd to run with -d10 by patching > file_server/fileserver.c. The issue appears to be in this call: 3638 /* Ensure there was no race condition. */ 3639 if (!check_same_stat(&smb_dname->st, &fsp->fsp_name->st)) { 3640

Just make gcc happy when fuse is not available. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- src/fuse.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/fuse.c b/src/fuse.c index 2bd6787..349a5b9 100644 --- a/src/fuse.c +++ b/src/fuse.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/wait.h> +#if HAVE_FUSE /* See

Okay, I want to do something similar to SAS proc format. I usually do this... a <- NULL a$divisionOld <- c(1,2,3,4,5) divisionTable <- matrix(c(1, "New England", 2, "Middle Atlantic", 3, "East North Central", 4, "West North Central", 5,

The proper file that should be included is `sys/xattr.h` as that comes from `glibc` and not `attr/xattr.h` which ships with the `attr` utility. New enough `attr` utility (at least 2.4.48 in my case) even includes a #warning in `attr/xattr.h` for projects that still have this mistake in the code. --- daemon/xattr.c | 8 ++------ fuse/test-fuse.c | 4 ---- lib/fuse.c |

After updating Samba from 3.0.20 to 3.0.21c NMDB is only bound to my NIC's IP but no longer to 127.0.0.1 though my smb.conf parameters are interfaces = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.x.x/255.255.255.0 bind interfaces only = yes As a result SWAT does not show the status of NMDB any longer. Any idea which parameters are different to 3.0.20 or is this a bug in 3.0.21c?

Hi all I'm having some problems trying to configure ACLs from a Win2000 SP3 client. I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on kernel 2.4.18 (with acl + ext attr), Samba is compiled with acl support etc. Samba is configured with security=domain, and is running with local groups etc rather than thru winbind, I haven't been game enough to tread those waters yet. With the debug level set to 5

Hi all, again. I am trying to set up samba with acl-support on a debian woody (final) box. The kernel has got XFS-support and getfacl and setfacl are working fine since I have built the acl-debian packages from SGI's acl-sources. Also attr-dev, acl-dev and the appropriate kernel-headers are installed. The acl.h can be found in /usr/include/sys/. But all my efforts trying to implement xfs

I have successfully joined a domain with Samba 3.0.30 But after approx. one or two hours, winbind looses connection to the domain controller and users are not allowed to connect shares. After a 'killall winbindd' and restarting of winbind, the users can connect to the shares again. How can I work around this bug? Configuration looks like this: [global] dos charset = ISO-8859-1

Hello ! I am using samba 3 with acl support and when I use the "hide unreadable" option, it only take the unix right. Even if they have read or write access given by acls, people have to be the owner of a directory to see it. I don't know if it's realy a bug or if i'm not using it the right way, i simply add it to a share definition. Thanks in advance ! Eric Guimont

In the mandriva rpm of rsync, we apply for our rpm the acl patch in the patches directory. I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test failed with this patch. It seems to be a minor problem, but can you have a look ? Thanks by advance. Following the message (a bit long): ----- itemize log follows Testing for symlinks using 'test -h' +

I have compiled both my kernel (2.4.17) and samba (2.2.3a) to support ACL/EAs. It looks like it has gone well, but I get one message that worries me, but I don't know if it should or not. checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no As you can see, the last line is where my

Hi, These three patches fix the problems in the version two. And them base on the Tao's patches: ocfs2/xattr: xattr improvement The first patch fix some problem in xattr code. The second patch add security EA support. The third patch add ACL support. Best regards, tiger

Well, I screwed around a bit and after doing a "wbinfo -u" and a "wbinfo -g" I stopped getting the "unable to map SID" error. Now I'm getting a different error. ;-D [2004/05/25 09:09:34, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(FC2-i386-disc1.iso) returning 0744 [2004/05/25 09:09:34, 3] smbd/posix_acls.c:convert_canon_ace_to_posix_perms(2500)

Hi everybody, i'm getting mad configuring samba to join an ADS, resolve domain users and groups and set ACLs via windows explorer on a share mounted with POSIX ACL and extended attributes. At the point where i am, i've managed to get Samba join correctly the domain with idmap_rid backend working fine. I can correctly set (add, remove, modify) file acls and extended attributes

Hi all, I try to use rsync with the option --acl but it doesn`t work. send_acl : sys_acl_get_file(haservices, SMB_ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported Does my rsync-package don`t support acls or what is going wrong here? How can I ensure that my rsync version is compiled with acl support? info: rsync-2.6.2-8 (rpm from sles9) cheers Stefan