similar to: Windows Server 2003 R2

hope this help some one else --as it helped me, in undertanding contributions to * wiki pages... Regards! Samuel ----- Original Message ----- From: "whatis.com" <WhatIs-BAD63EB5A68046E1@lists.techtarget.com> To: "whatis.com" <WhatIs@lists.techtarget.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:31 AM Subject: Word-of-the-Day: wiki > THE

For those who don't wake up at 5.00 am and start reading /. http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid7_gci935769,00.html -- Dave Cotton <dcotton@linuxautrement.com>

A colleague pointed me to this article advocating R as a Matlab substitute. Here is the link (deliberately on two lines: http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/ originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci902076,00.html I'm not a Matlab user, but I understand that it provides a nice front end to the Linpack collection of numerical linear algebra routines. My friend and I wonder if R can really

Hi All, I'm running netbench against our samba based filer and having I believe a controller problem. When I configure the test to run multiple engines per client (about 5 in my case) and about 20 clients so all together I have 100 engines, the controller crashes. My clients are a mix of NT4, winxp and win2000 systems. If I run the controller on windows 2003, the controller simply

Security pundits have been warning about the dangers implicit with Web services for years. A good starting point for understanding the security issues related to Web services can be found at: http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid26_gci872720,00.html Of course to really understand the security risks posed by Web services, you need to understand the basics of Web

Dear NUT users and developers, Like the other years, before taking a small rest, here are some news related to NUT. * First, you should have seen the 2.0.5-pre1 release announcement. I don't think 2.0.5 is very far, but I realized that I've made an archive including the .svn directory (bad, bad me. I should know that release are made against exported svn, not checked out!) * Next,

Dear NUT users and developers, Like the other years, before taking a small rest, here are some news related to NUT. * First, you should have seen the 2.0.5-pre1 release announcement. I don't think 2.0.5 is very far, but I realized that I've made an archive including the .svn directory (bad, bad me. I should know that release are made against exported svn, not checked out!) * Next,

Hello, Does samba support the use of S4U? What do we need to configure in SAMBA or krb5 to support getting a ticket obtained by S4U. We are using 3.0.25 and krb5-1.4.1 We are getting the following error: decode_pac_data: Name in PAC [username@something1.something2.realmname] does not match principal name in ticket The ticket could be different than the PAC name because the

I've been looking for real-world examples of this for a long time -- mainly because I'm trying to decide whether to restrict my build-options to using only components which are all compatible with IOV. I'm thinking that the constraint would be worth it, if IOV could provide a significant performance benefit for non-network peripherals such as storage, video processing, etc. (compared

Hi All, When trying to map my SAMBA share from WinXP, it prompted me for name and password but it failed when I used name@domain.com However, using "domain\name" worked. Any idea why my SAMBA server didn't accept this name style name@domain ? Assume: Realm (AD domain): domain.com Pre-windows2000: domain Username: name Samba server: 3.0.7 (soon will switch to latest) Am

I have installed the latest alpha of samba (1.9.18alpha4) with the intent of testing against the Ziff-Davis benchmark NetBench. The compile and install went OK, and I can see the server in the browser and connect to the public share I created (logins work OK). Running the tests in DIAGNOSIS.txt produces no errors also. I can also install netbench and start up the controller from the binary

Hi all, there is a problem with the 'Default: nt smb support = yes' option in smb.conf for at least Samba 2.2.3a and 2.2.4 (on FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE) when using Netbench 7.0.2 on WXP or W2k clients. If the client is set to run 2+ Netbench engines (to simulate 2+ real clients) and 'nt smb support = yes', all but one engine fail pretty quickly, usually during a movefile oder

'Put even more simply by [Gartner analyst] Dulaney: "I'll do anything for money."' That, in a nutshell, is why Gartner is so out of touch. It pays! On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 12:00 -0500, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:12:06 -0400 > From: "Dean Collins" <Dean at cognation.net> > Subject: [asterisk-users]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm running some netbench tests, and I have some questions I'd like to ask. First, what is the difference between the dm.tst and ent_dm.tst NetBench suites? Second, what results have people been getting with Samba 3.0.0? I'm seeing a peak at 340.00 for ent_dm.tst and 101.00 for dm.tst on a P4 system with 512 MB RAM. Any information

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I was running a netbench performance test against Samba 3.0.11, and the test has not been able to complete fully. The samba logs contain lines such as this: [2005/02/28 11:35:23, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(645) ~ slave16 (192.168.133.116) connect to service netbench initially as user BENCHLAB+slave16 (uid=10016, gid=10001) (pid

Has anyone gotten Netbench 6.0 running on Windows 2000 clients to work under samba? I'm running Samba 2.1.0-prealpha on linux with Windows 2000 professional clients. When I try to run it, it initializes successfully but when it starts to execute a test I get the error "Mix lock of handle 6 for length 1 at offset 2147483538 Failed". I'd appreciate any help. Nothing peculiar

Hello all, The performance comparison between Polly's Cloog and ISL code generator is posted on http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/59?compare_to=58&baseline=58 It seems their execution-time performance are comparable: Performance Regressions - Execution Time  (ISL over Cloog) MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt 8.49%

http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid39_gci1328938,00.html -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL:

from the man page. I've never tried veto oplocks. But it looks like something that might be useful... > veto oplock files (S) > > This parameter is only valid when the oplocks parameter is turned > on for a share. It allows the Samba administrator to selectively > turn off the granting of oplocks on selected files that match a >

Hi, Sean: I'm sorry I lie. I didn't mean to lie. I did try to avoid making a *BIG* change to the IPO pass-ordering for now. However, when I make a minor change to populateLTOPassManager() by separating module-pass and non-module-passes, I saw quite a few performance difference, most of them are degradations. Attacking these degradations one by one in a piecemeal manner is wasting