similar to: wins browsing issue

Hi there. Currently, our network design has two ISP lines and 3 subnets for LAN. Below are some details :- eth0 - isp1 eth1 - isp2 eth2 - subnet1 eth3 - subnet2 eth4 - subnet3 What i wanted to do is to assign incoming port 80 to our local squid server running on the firewall itself and assigned it to eth0(ISP1). I think it shouldnt be a problem as /etc/shorewall/rules provides a sample of the

Hi all, I would like to do something like this at Samba level: hosts allow = subnet1/mask1 subnet2/mask2 etc hosts deny = * But this doesn't seem to work (machine that are not in subnet1 and not in subnet2 still have access) I think the * is not understood by Samba, I tried ALL, this didn't work either. I'm gonna check the samba source code but if I could get an expert answer

I have 1 100MB NIC with two 2MB-subnets trough a router behind it. I''d like to create multiple default classes: 1: + |\_ 1:10 default, ceiling 100000kbit, rate 96000kbit | |\_ 1:11 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 2048kbit | | | |\_1:110 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 1536kbit | \_1:111 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 512kbit (default subnet1) | \_ 1:12 ceiling 2048kbit, rate

I am planning to upgrade the DCs using the join and promote method. List of DCs ----------- 1) SAMBA1 2) SAMBA2 3) DC1 4) DC2 Currently SAMBA1 is the PDC and SAMBA2 is the "SDC" and are in sync with replication and rsync sysvol. DCs SAMBA1 and SAMBA2 are 4.1 git releases with AD Schema version 47. My plan to get to AD Schema version 69 was... 0. Add entries to the DHCP Server for the

I'm configuring a HA-cluster to share disks using heartbeat from http://www.linux-ha.org/ Two machines, lets call them server1 and server2 share the same disk with an ocfs2 file system. However, the two machines have separate disks for their OS installations. The two physical servers have two gigabit nics each and on those nics I place four virtual IP addresses which heartbeat makes sure is

In my /var/log/messages file, in recent days I have been receiving numerous messages such as: Jun 23 15:02:50 OUR-HOST named[577]: sysquery: nslookup reports danger (dns.SUBNET1.OTHER.DOMAIN.AAA.BBB.CCC.in-addr.arpa) Jun 23 15:02:51 OUR-HOST named[577]: sysquery: nslookup reports danger (HOST2.SUBNET2.OTHER.DOMAIN.AAA.BBB.CCC.in-addr.arpa) Jun 23 15:02:51 OUR-HOST named[577]: sysquery:

A number of you are flailing around trying to get the subject combination to work. You should all be aware that there are parts of this that don''t currently work and that won''t work well until there are enhancements made to Shorewall (and probably to Netfilter). I. There is no clean way currently to support Road Warriors from a Masquerading Netfilter firewall/gateway. As

Hello List, I have a special L2 VPN connected samba deployment setup and I want to make sure the name resolution arrangement is the best for the network. Setup : network 1 + Samba1<<SAME IP range>> <L2 VPN> network2 <<SAME IP range>> + Samba2 I have noticed that the wins server and wins support options are non-inclusive. Samba2: name resolve order =

Hello all, I have a few samba servers running winbind that are joined to the AD 2003 domain. Is it possible to designate one samba server to host the users' home directories instead of each one of them? If we have samba1, samba2, and samba3 and designate samba1 to host the home directories and when a user accesses samba 2 either via ssh or as a share, the home directory that the user sees

Hi, I am configuring a network with two subnets with a different workgroup in each subnet. My aim is to have users being able to view and access shares on both workgroups. I have a Samba server in each subnet/workgroup, configured as both the domain and local master for each workgroup. Each server is also the WINS server for its subnet. The setup is like this: Subnet1: network -

Dear all For some reasons I would like to run two samba installations (/opt/samba1 and /opt/samba2) on the same host. Is such a dual installation supported? If yes, what do I have to consider? With many thanks Paul ******* <br> Notice: The information contained in this message is intended only for use of the individual(s) named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or

Hi! I have a problem with samba, that I don't know if it's possible to solve. This is my network: <Subnet1>-Ethernet-<Gateway>-Ethernet-<Subnet2>-Internet Subnet1 is my own local network (bcast 192.168.1.255), Gateway is my own gateway machine (FreeBSD4.4, IPs: 192.168.1.1 and 193.13.35.101), Subnet2 is my neighbours (bcast 193.13.255.255). I can configure all

Greetings, I just received some netweb-301 phones frm Seshu down in NJ. I cannot for the life of me get it to register with the asterisk server, nor upgrade the firmware to the latest (1.41) i'm still using 1.37. The packets are traversing the router, going into the other subnet, hitting the asterisk box, but not actually making it to asterisk. Nothing in the asterisk logs, but tcpdump

Hi All, Is anybody succeed to run a configuration on a two node clusters with Samba installed on each machine? I compiled two versions on different directories (/usr/local/samba1 and samba2). At this point, I can run 2 samba's on one node in case of failure but problems are on Active Directory authentication for the Fallback node. Any suggestion! I'm running AIX 5.2 with HACMP and

Hello Kevin, We have a  Samba/Windows20008R2 domain that's been running a few years now. Here are the details: * clients auth with SSSD (ldap, kerberos, ldap_schema=rfc2307bis) * idmap * samba on clients/server for joining domain We have scripts that automatically create users with UnixHomeDir, UID and GUID numbers within AD. I don't know about using WInbind...  I dropped that

> Get rid of samba3 by demoting it again as you did last time, search > through sam.ldb for any mention of samba3 and samba4 (you will > probably have to use '--cross-ncs' with ldbsearch or lbdedit), then > remove them. > Now start again with a new DC, but this time, call it anything but > samba3 or samba4. Getting worse and worse .... I demoted samba3 and then also

Here is my scenario when a client wants to resolve a name on my local network: CLIENT --> VPN --> SAMBA --> DNS The client is set up like so: DNS1 = ISP DNS1 (204.26.64.1) DNS2 = ISP DNS2 (204.26.80.3) WINS1 = my samba1 (10.10.1.5) WINS2 = my samba2 (10.10.1.8) This all _seemed_ to have worked 3 days ago for roughly 6 months but stopped suddenly without me doing anything. When the

Hi, I am getting an I/O error while running fsstress on client samba mount point (only with smbfs) Can anyone, please look into this problem? Problem Description: x370 was configured for samba server & x206f as samba client. fsstress was running from two samba mount points from client i.e /SAMBA1 (type cifs) & /SAMBA2 (type smbfs). There was no load generating on /SAMBA2 & hence

I am using tinc to connect together VPCs in AWS across multiple regions and accounts to provide secure communication. For the most part, it works great. A few times, I have seen issues where something got into an unstable state that didn't seem to resolve itself. Shutting down tinc on all hosts and restarting seemed to do the trick, but I'd like to see if there is something that I can

for users defined on the PDC. However, I am setting up a second Samba server and want it to join the domain so I can use "security = domain". Lets call the PDC samba1 and the new samba client samba2. ON samba 1, I did: useradd -c 'Samba2 SAMBA' -d /dev/null -M -g 202 -s /bin/false -u 1503 samba2\$ passwd -l samba2\$ smbpasswd -a -m samba2\$ to create the trust account. Then