similar to: Windows File Permissions

I am experiencing an odd problem while attempting to mount and access a directory with smbfs. smbclient does not exhibit the same behavior. I have created a directory /mnt/smb-test and am attempting to mount a volume from a NetApp Filer running OnTap 7 with NTFS security mode. An Active Directory DC handles security for the share. The Linux machine shows as registered in AD and I can use

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7799 Summary: rsync don't full syncronise xattr Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ivan.solomin at gmail.com

In rsync 2.5, using the --backup and --backup-dir switches without a --suffix would copy backed up files to the backup dir with no extension. In 2.6, you must use a blank suffix ("suffix=") in order to get the same behavior. This means that 2.5 clients are unable to backup to the server without putting a suffix on the backups. The documentation also still indicates that the old

Good ${time of the day} I have just been wondering if anyone would know if Samba is compatible with the CIFS implementation of the Network Appliance DataONTAP filers? http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/ontap.html I have so far unable to connect to any shared folder on the NetApp filer that require authentication. An attempt to access or list shared resources on the NetApp filer fails with the

I've been been trying to investigate this for sometime now, hence I came to the experts :) I have rejoined all my DC's with new names, see below. ;; ANSWER SECTION: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS psad101zatcrh.<domain>.corp. -> New rebuild, new hostname, RHEL6 to RHEL7 upgrade <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS prdc001zafsrh.<domain>.corp. -> New

We are running scripts using smbclient to get some data of NetAPP filer and we run into the output below. After doing some digging, I found that there is a incompatibility between NetAPP Data ONTAP OS and samba. Is this still the case or there is a fix for it. We are running 3.0.10 Any ideas would be great George Client started (version 3.0.10). Connecting to 169.177.18.109 at port 445

In the subdivision where I live, we have a well that time to time has problems. Currently, our trustees call me, I take a message, and then call the people on our "phone calling tree" and give them the message. They, in turn, pass the message on to the rest of the residents. We have a few problems with the way this works -- people don't bother to relay the message, or,

On 11/04/2023 13:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> What 'Debian distribution-specific' installation did you follow ? > The one linked to in AD DC wiki. Where abouts is this link ? I checked here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller But couldn't

Two attached patches for samba 2.2.7a and 3.0-alfa22, that I've made today, fix 3 bugs mentioned in my previous e-mail. 1) For each file in addition to ALLOW ACE proper DENY ACE is created. 2) "Take ownership" is shown DENIED for all except root ACEs 3) Read Permissions and read attributes are always shown as allowed, as they are actually allowed. -- Zhitomirsky

Hello,     I would like to share some info on how I was able to successfully run an online backup after several failed attempts. I would constantly get the following error when attempting to run an online backup. ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (3221225506, '{Access Denied} A process has requested access to an object but has not been granted those access rights.') Looking

Maybe I'm doing somthing really stupid, but while copying some windows share onto a samba server, on some random subdirectory robocopy says ERROR 87 (0x00000057) Copying NTFS Security to Destination Directory... The samba logfile has lots of these lines. modules/vfs_posixacl.c:349(smb_acl_to_posix) smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Das Argument ist ung?ltig) The strange thing is

Hi I have a samba 3 ldap domain working perfect, and nowwe are evaluating to migratw to samba 4 AD. I have read samba wiki and seems clear but we are not sure how tomigrate cifs resources, we use cifs resources in some windows server and alsp some cifs wirh linux server and setfscl permissions, and the most important, a netappcifs with dataontap 8.1.4 7 mode that was attached as nt mode. My

Hello there I've just been trying to get a NetApp FAS2020, DataOnTap 7.2.5.1 to join our domain. No luck so far . The PDC is samba 3.2.4 with ldap backend. I created the account manually and when I try to join the NetApp I get these in the samba logs. [2008/11/14 08:32:48, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:_netr_ServerAuthenticate2(520) _netr_ServerAuthenticate2: netlogon_creds_server_check

Hi, we are testing a new AD domain that will replace our old NT4 one, and we are setting up a new cifs vserver of our Netapp filer (running Clustered Dataontap 9.2). The new AD domain was a clean deployment created using "samba-tool domain provision --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 ...". All seems to work well and the Netapp filer joins the domain without errors and seems to run fine.

Sorry for eventually wrong AD terminology! > You haven't fixed the 'xidNumber:100 issue', giving 'Domain Users' the > ID of '513' is not a good idea and I think you may have just changed > '100' in idmap.ldb to '513' >From the AD DC (;-)) shell the user was missing the "Domain Users" group and we tought that could be a xidNumber

Hi, I am hoping someone can kick me up the learning curve (!) on Virtualization: We have an old piece of data logging software that was written in Turbo Pascal 6 using a file I/O module tuned to Netware and so it expects its data files to be on a Netware server and will not access them locally or via an MS/Samba share - essentially, it uses direct NCP calls for parts of its data access. The

Please for give me if this gets a bit long. I am presently in the process of moving my company's file server from Windows NT 4.0 over to Linux with SAMBA and the lack of ACL support in the ext2 filesystem is making things very difficult to design. To clarify I am NOT writing about Samba's support for NT ACL's on NTFS. I am writing to possibly get some tips for getting around the lack

I have just pushed out SYSLINUX 3.70-pre8. The two main differences is that I have updated the gPXE source base, and added a sanboot module (sanboot.c32). sanboot.c32 *should* be capable of initiating an iSCSI or AoE boot, but I haven't actually tested it. The other main difference is that gPXE now advertises HTTP/1.0 instead of HTTP/1.1, since the code was not actually HTTP/1.1

By any chance is any one aware of a website, book, paper, etc. or combinations of those sources that show plots of different distributions? After reading a pretty good whitepaper I became aware of the benefit of I the benefit of doing Q-Q plots and histograms to help assess a distribution.   The whitepaper is called: "Univariate Analysis and Normality Test Using SAS, Stata, and SPSS*" ,

Hello, I've been Googling and O'Reillying around this problem for the last week without success, so I'm either stupid or it's not possible. My money's still on stupid. Can someone confirm that I can't do what I want to do: - Have a SuSE 9.1 Linux box running Samba 3.0 exporting shares by SMB. - Have users log into Windows boxes running a NetWare client,