similar to: [PROBLEM] Samba > 3.0.11 and the xp-missing-files patch

Linux Samba 3.0.12 + acl (ext3) =============================== When upgrading from 3.0.11 to 3.0.12 ACL's do not seem get used anymore. We are using the inherit acls options for both maps and files. After the upgrade users are unable to create new files in directories where they used to have privileges for. The error returned is: "The file already exists. Do you want to

Hi! I've been compiling Samba 3.0.x on a Solaris 2.6 server using GCC 3.4.1 without any problem until recently... The problem started with 3.0.12 version, and reproduced in 3.0.13. Doing "configure" and then "make" produces with these two versions VERY HUGE binaries! I'm talking about more than 50 Megabytes binaries in some cases... With 3.0.11 and before I had much

To start all the daemons in my Linuxes I use the code like: errtext=`daemon 2>&1` if [ $? -ne 0 ]; do smth. with errtext too... And this used to work for Samba as well. But for 3.0.11 (and very probably not only for this release) this code doesn't work for nmbd: `nmbd 2>&1` freezes forever. But the daemon is started and works at the same time. And the shell

hi all, i'm sending some messages via "smbclient -M <user>" from my solaris-system to my windows-pc and this fails now since i installed 3.0.12 (it also does with 3.0.13). comparing the debug-output of 3.0.11 and 3.0.12 shows that it now tries to open a connection to port 445 instead of 139! why has this changed? thanks a lot, christian

We are running with a little over 100GB of office data, and about 200GB misc other data shared to approximately 50 users using samba across two servers acting as PDC and BDC to Windows 2000 & XP Pro clients. Also using roaming profiles and ldap backend inclusive of nss_ldap and pam_ldap for the unix side - works well except for the more recent and horribly crippling MS Office bug. Tried

Over the weekend I upgraded my IRIX servers to 3.0.13 and have found many strange issues regarding the creation of new folders. When I attempt to add a new folder through the Windows side I get an immediate error dialog box stating "You may not be able to access file created in the folder X:\New Folder." When I select to continue the folder is created, looking on the IRIX side the

I have this same problem on 3.0.10, and I also "fixed" it by deleting the tdbs. My problem, had nothing to do with printing, it was happening once I started winbindd with security = ADS. Jerry, what would we need to do to track this bug down in the tdb code? I have logs at level 10, ltrace output, and a backtrace. Do you think that there were changes made to the tdb code in 3.0.12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: samba versions above 3.0.11 doesn't respect 'dos charset' option. Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 00:01:41 +0200 From: Martin Ottm?r <ottmarm@volny.cz> To: bugzilla-maintenance@samba.org I tried to compile samba (gentoo user) 3.0.12 and 3.0.14a and when I'm browsing on my brother's PC

Hi Rowland, i've modified, the dns like below: RODC-1: - themself - DC-1 - DC-2 DC-1 And DC-2 dns configuration not modified But the problems remains - samba-tool drs replicate rodc-1 dc-2 dc=scratch,dc=lan -U administrator did not replicate - network browsing anyway require authentication and not work Enrico Manzini -----Messaggio originale----- Da: samba <samba-bounces at

On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:29:59 +0000 Manzini Enrico <emanzini at zensistemi.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, below, the servers and the remote client dns configuration > > Server's dns configuration: > DC-1: > - themself > - DC-2 > > DC-2 > - themself > - DC-1 > > RODC-1 > - DC-1 > - DC-2 > - themself > In my opinion, all Samba AD DCs

Hi Rowland, below, the servers and the remote client dns configuration Server's dns configuration: DC-1: - themself - DC-2 DC-2 - themself - DC-1 RODC-1 - DC-1 - DC-2 - themself REMOTE-CLIENT - directly point as dns to the RODC-1 ip - nltest /dsgetdc:domain_name report RODC-1 as logon server DNS SRV RECORDS: The ad srv records uses default configuration Enrico Manzini

(second try at sending this) --- This is getting very dangerous. We cannot take our flamewar to outside mailing lists without making a complete fool of ourselves. Arc, would you please refrain from doing so in future and rather come to an internal agreement beforehand? Arc, there are a few things you have missed: The discussion on OggPCM2 was friendly and constructive and there were no flame

This is getting very dangerous. We cannot take our flamewar to outside mailing lists without making a complete fool of ourselves. Arc, would you please refrain from doing so in future and rather come to an internal agreement beforehand? Arc, there are a few things you have missed: The discussion on OggPCM2 was friendly and constructive and there were no flame wars and the spec got much further

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Heads up everyone: Due to the win98 explorer bug (https://bugzilla.samba.org/bug/2501), we will be release 3.0.13 on Thursday morning, March 24 (GMT-6). So if you have any outstanding bugs in the 3.0.12 that we should know about, let us know now. Please file any defect reports at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Thanks. cheers, jerry

First thank you to the team for the Samba software. I have been using this on a number of sites with excellent results and very few problems over the years. I have just upgraded two sites to Samba 3.0.13 from 3.0.11. Both sites are small and use smbpasswd as the password db backend. Since the upgrade I am unable to change a users password (as root) using smbpasswd. There are two reported

Hi, Looking at some udp stuff on snv_57, and I noticed that mib:::udpInDatagrams no longer exists, has this been superceded by mib:::udpHCInDatagrams? From my understanding they represent the same counter, but I''m asking in case this is a bug. I noticed that there is still a reference to udpInDatagrams in the DTrace testsuite. - Fintan

Linux Red Hat 6.x: egcs-1.1.2-24 glibc-2.1.3-22 binutils-2.9.1.0.23-6 kernel-2.2.22-6.2.3 libiconv-1.9.1-1 libiconv-devel-1.9.1-1 Last working is 3.0.10, never tried 3.0.11 3.0.12. 3.0.13 and 3.0.14a will crash at first smbd usage. Notes: - To make it compile I performed the following adaptations perl -pi -e 's|-Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined||' Makefile - No

Hi! I?m about to migrate a system whith 5000 accounts whith (~ 500GB) from "postfix/courier-imap/maildrop/mysql" to a new hardware whith "postfix/dovecot/dovecot/mysql". I?ll make a separate partition (raid 1) for the mail spool (/var/spool/vmail) and want to now what type of filesystem to use on it to increase performance. I read that XFS is a good choice, but is not

Arc, I always thought of you as a harmless idiot, but I no longer think you are harmless. You are now alone working on the OggPCM because everyone got tired of your power trip (I always thought some power was required to do that). Funnily enough, from the moment people gave up on you, it took only 24 hours to write a much better OggPCM definition than what you had (even though we don't

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:10:22AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > That spec is being superceded by: > > http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggPCM2 The project has been forked, not superceded. Work on OggPCM is continuing, the team working on OggPCM2 is free to submit their own draft but some are not welcome to continue work on OggPCM due to their recent social conduct. I'm