similar to: Folder permissions not shown under XP

Samba 3.0.7, XP Pro SP1 clients When I view the "Properties|Security" tab on a folder from my XP SP1 clients, the checkboxes indicating the various permission settings are all empty. The share is functioning fine otherwise, permissions are OK when inspected from the Unix side. Does anyone know a work around (or fix!)? This came up back in 2003, without resolution:

Hi all. I originally suspected this problem was with netbios (which I have disabled by default) and Jerry has helped me out a bit with but I've been doing some more digging and I think the problem lies back further than I expected. I was trying to upgrade from 3.0.7 to 3.0.11 so I've recompiled all versions back from 3.0.11 and the problem first occured in 3.0.8. The issue is with

Hallo, > We have problems with printing after installing XP SP2. > In nearly every software it takes about 10 seconds to 30 seconds, if you > click on "Print-Button" and wait for the print dialogue window. > Extremly slow are programs like MS Word (30 seconds, when you open a > document the first time). same problem here. This a known but _unresolved_ problem for Samba

Hi, This is a message requesting help for the following problem: Printing Word 97 documents, stored on a Samba server, on an NT4 system to an LPD print queue fails under certain well-defined conditions, creating an empty file called 'Ne<number>:' (e.g. 'Ne120:'). The problem appears to be easily reproducable, as long as you have more than 99 print queues on your NT system.

Greetings, We are running samba 3.0.7 with cups 1.1.20 to serve printing to WinXP pro SP1 clients running Microsoft Access 2002 Our users are having problems "Creating reports in design view" in MS Access when the default printer is a samba queue. As soon as you change the default printer to a non samba queue, everything works fine. I've been searching the archives and it

I am responding to your post, listed below. I am having the same problem with GoldMine which I believe is written in much the same way as most clipper based applications. Did you ever resolve the issue? I just posted to the newsgroup but did not hear back yet. I pormise to post a summary should an answer show up. I'm running 2.2.1a and will soon move to 2.2.2 to avoid oplock problem.

Hi, I posted this problem before in more detail (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=104756899022766&w=2) but received no response. At the current state of Smaba 3.0 and Samba-TNG these two seem to be incomaptible. Samba 3.0 can't join a TNG controlled domain. I think this should affect a lot of installations as TNG as a controller and "stable" as file/printserver seem

Hi I found a patch for Samba 3.0.2 allowing to add hosts as member of the domain admin group. (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=107938779530259&w=2) Has anybody seen a patch for Samba 3.0.3? It took a look at srv_samr_nt.c but I don't think the old patch will fit. Why doesn't samba allow domain admins to add hosts to a domain? I don't want to give the root password to

Hello, I have the same problem this post : http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=114881731013700&w=2 After read the solution, What can i do for an production server on next week ? samba 3.0.22 is stable version, anybody know if it fixed this bug. thanks. Rodolphe

Hello all: I am running Samba 2.2.3a on RedHat 7.3. I have a user with an extensive Local Profile. I want to join his computer to the domain and make his current local profile a roaming one. I have tried the following steps: Attached the computer to the domain. Logged into the computer as a Domain Administrator. Gone to my computer -> user profiles. Selected the users local profile

dear list, i have problems when compiling openldap-2.0.23 and the latest samba version (2.2.3a) on netbsd (8500/180 powerpc). Openldap compile procedure is running fine but when trying to compile samba --with-ldapsam I get just this message : config.log : configure:13019: gcc -o conftest -O -I/usr/local/openldap-2.0.23/include -L/usr/local/openldap-2.0.23/lib conftest.c -lldap -llber

I'm trying to solve this issue I'm having where using 'valid users = +unixgroup' just plain doesn't work. I can't find any /documented/ reason why this is so, but nevertheless, it seems to be the case. This is with samba 3.6.18, but seems to exist in all of 3.6.x and most or all of 3.5.x and perhaps earlier as well (see bug #6681). From what I can tell, the underlying

Hi Nick, This topic should be on samba@lists.samba.org - not technical. I'll give you a brief overview, and any followup send to me directly. HP-CIFS Server for 11.0 is based upon Samba 2.2.12. Support for 11.0 ends there - at 2.2.12. Go to: http://h20293.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=B8725AA If you want to continue on 11.0, HP posts 3.0.14a Opensource

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== Oplocks are strange -- Volker Lendecke ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a release candidate of the 3.0.20 code base and is provided for

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== My life is driven by bugzilla -- Jeremy Allison ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of the 3.0.20 code base and is

Hi all, I finally got some info on this problem that you guys might have and not even know about! So check this out. -Steve ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:59:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Urban Widmark <> To: woodbri@swoodbridge.com Copies to: Ed McNierney <> Subject: Re: SMBFS missing files using ls and

I'm sorry I gave the appearance I was slamming you. The tone was supposed to be "Please, help yourself first, here's why... here's ALL of the resources I use to help myself." I've successfully been able to keep questions about Samba to this list down to a minimum by first consulting all of my sources and perhaps you can, too. As I read it again, it had the appearance

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== My life is driven by bugzilla -- Jeremy Allison ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of the 3.0.20 code base and is

We have samba 3.0.21c + openldap working ok. Some weeks ago I got this answer (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=113164752004902&w=2) to my question about whether it's better to have one or multiple windows domains, in favor of having only one domain. Now, we're gonna put into production a NAS box (one Windows Storage Server) for our main domain and for our whole

I'm trying to join the Windows Server 2003 test server my university has set up for their Novell to Windows migration and have run into some trouble. I can kinit and net ads join just fine, but when I try a wbinfo -g/-u I get: Error looking up domain groups/users When I run wbinfo -t I get: checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NOT_FOUND