similar to: Domain Users Group Effective Permissions on Workstation files after upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.0.11

First thank you in advance for any help you may give I have brought up Samba 3.0.2a all is working very well except in a very specific instance on redhat 8.0 Compiled from sources with the bugzilla tracking patch 1147 installed though we had this problem before 1147 was installed When trying to print, print preview, or even generate a new report from access 2002 or newer and only when an HP

Jason Haar <Jason.Haar@trimble.co.nz> wrote: | Well I've just had a crash last night, and I've copies the log files off. | But I see nothing to suggest what happened. Also I've enabled core-dumps, | and no core dump exits, even though smbd died... | | If you look at the smb.conf file, you'll see I've put in a HUGE sleep | statement to be called via "panic

Hi, After playing around with Samba 3.0.11 with smbldap-tools v0.8.6 and later with v0.8.7 it seems that joining workstations to domain with 'smbldap-adduser -w ws001' is not possible because it generates LDAP entries only as objectclass posixAccount and objectclass sambaSamAccount is missing. So joining domain from workstation or making Computer account with smbldap-useradd -w

(found on dslr voip forum) http://www.freephoneproject.com/nexthop/ I think this is pretty cool. not too sure how stable/durable though, at least not until there are a lot more nodes providing service. also unsure of the legality vs. your average telco's consumer tos, but it's definitely not reselling. jeff pulver (crom bless him) seemed to be fairly amused, stuff like this fits

I'm trying to port our Samba PDC running Version 3.0.4 to a new Hardware. I installed the new System with Samba Version 3.0.11. I named the new server (majestix) different to our old one (tuxix), but let the Domain Name unchanged (KLEINTUXINGEN). Is it possible to copy the installation from the old to the new system? What do I havte to change and how? Who can give me advise here? I dont

Hello all, I'm trying to calculate the standar desviation and I'm using the function sd(x,na.rm=TRUE) and I have this error:? Error in var(x, na.rm = na.rm) : no complete element pairs . Why happen this?, What can I do to solve it?. x is list of three numbers which I have from a table. Thanks so much from Spain Carlos Morales Diego

> Sergey Loskutov wrote > >> Problem 2. >> Launch tools usrmgr.exe >> Try create user >> Username: "John". Select to group button. User by default in member to "Domain Users" >> Added group "Domain Admins" press ok and next ok ... user is create ..... it's greet! >> >> Select propertes user "John" and press

Hi, Please cc me on any replies as I'm not subscribed. First, I've seen reference to this problem on the list but no solution, eg.: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=106032316504352&w=2 Platform is: # uname -a Linux allanon 2.4.21-xfs-aihplc3 #1 SMP Thu Aug 21 15:50:27 BST 2003 i686 unknown Debian woody. Samba is 3.0.0final-1 from Debian unstable complied for woody.

Resending as I'm no closer to a solution and really would appreciate any help that anyone has to offer. Hi, Please cc me on any replies as I'm not subscribed. First, I've seen reference to this problem on the list but no solution, eg.: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=106032316504352&w=2 Platform is: # uname -a Linux allanon 2.4.21-xfs-aihplc3 #1 SMP Thu Aug 21

I'm using gcc 3.4.1 on Solaris 9. A make check produced the following output after compiling 3.0.11... Anyone have suggestions on what to do to fix it, or should I just ignore it? strstr_m FAIL ----------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File

I've run into a compile problem with Samba 3.0.11 and have searched the web, lists, and bugzilla for assistance, but was unable to find anything that helped with these errors. I have been able to successfully build this release without ldap/ads support, however with the ldap/ads support it fails to build pdb_ldap.c. I am using AIX 5.1 using the gcc compiler. I have also ensured that OpenLdap

Hi all. I've just upgraded from 3.0.7 to 3.0.11 and now my server can no longer establish a trust relationship with the domain controllers. It appears to be because we have netbios turned off (in config: disable netbios = yes). I was getting this error: trusted_domains: Could not open a connection to DBG for PIPE_NETLOGON (NT_STATUS _DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NOT_FOUND ...so I searched the list

To start all the daemons in my Linuxes I use the code like: errtext=`daemon 2>&1` if [ $? -ne 0 ]; do smth. with errtext too... And this used to work for Samba as well. But for 3.0.11 (and very probably not only for this release) this code doesn't work for nmbd: `nmbd 2>&1` freezes forever. But the daemon is started and works at the same time. And the shell

Hello. I'm trying to run Samba on HP-UX (IA64), but I can't compile Samba source. I have this following packages: Samba 3.0.11 libiconv 1.9.1 HP-UX 11.23 (IA64) "configure" process is ok. At "make" process, I encounters the parsing error. I attached the compile error log. Do you have information how to compile Samba on HP-UX (IA64)? -- Osamu Takeuchi

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ~From the Bernard-look-at-me-department: This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should run for all current bug-fixes. Please read the following important changes in this release. Common bugs fixed in 3.0.11 include: ~ o Crash in smbd when using CUPS printing. ~ o Parsing error of other SIDs

Hi. We have been using samba 3.0.11 for years and now we need to add some win7 machines to our domain. So I test up-to-date Samba versions (3.6.19, 4.1.0 compiled, and Centos today "native" binary package 3.6.something) and with all of them I run into the same problem. I get stuck with protocols when checking XP machines (which works like a charm in 3.0.11 domain) When max protocol is

Hello, After upgrading our samba DC from 3.0.10 to 3.0.11, we have been experiencing problems with groupmapping. In 3.0.10, we had to explicitly map our Unix groups (local or NIS) to NT groups with a 'net groupmap add' command. However, in 3.0.11, all our Unix groups are mapped automagically. Although they do not show up with a 'net groupmap list' on the DC, our clients can

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: samba versions above 3.0.11 doesn't respect 'dos charset' option. Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 00:01:41 +0200 From: Martin Ottm?r <ottmarm@volny.cz> To: bugzilla-maintenance@samba.org I tried to compile samba (gentoo user) 3.0.12 and 3.0.14a and when I'm browsing on my brother's PC

Linux Samba 3.0.12 + acl (ext3) =============================== When upgrading from 3.0.11 to 3.0.12 ACL's do not seem get used anymore. We are using the inherit acls options for both maps and files. After the upgrade users are unable to create new files in directories where they used to have privileges for. The error returned is: "The file already exists. Do you want to

When I try to establish a trust from SAMBA 3.0.11 to Windows 2003 I get the error: NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE. I have no problem the other way. I had no problem either, when I ran SAMBA 3.0.9, and the problem disappeared when I down-graded to 3.0.9. Here is what happens ('CALYPSO' is the Windows-server and 'KONTOR' is its domain-name): [root@linux /root]# net rpc trustdom