similar to: brlock.tdb/locking.tdb permissions problem?

I'm running 2.11, and I've noticed a number of log entries that look like so: angie.log: tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2004/10/03 15:14:36, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531) tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/brlock.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) The files in question look like this:

Hi, I'm hunting a bug in 3.0.x (tested on 3.0.10 and 3.0.20). Users can create and modfy files, but cannot delete them. The logs show [2005/09/21 20:48:14, 0, pid=18388, effective(4019, 412), real(4019, 0)] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767) tdb(/srv/physik.fu-berlin.de/data/.samba/cluster1-test/cache/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2005/09/21 20:48:15, 0,

When I start winbindd (Samba v2.2.3a on Linux), I get the entries in log.winbindd shown below. What's the story on all those complaints about file "unexpected.tdb"? There is no general problem with Samba writing to that subdirectory: # ll /var/lock/samba/ total 288 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 696 Feb 12 22:01 brlock.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 231 Feb 13

Hi I my smbd.log, I can find these lines. How to resolv this problem ? [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5] lib/gencache.c:gencache_init(59) Opening cache file at /var/cache/samba/gencache.tdb [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724) tdb(unnamed): tdb_brlock failed (fd=12) at offset 4 rw_type=1 lck_type=13: Ressource temporairement non disponible [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5]

I've run into a problem with samba and tdb reporting "too many connections" If I do a typical configure: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba \ --localstatedir=/var/samba \ --with-lockdir=/var/samba/locks \ --with-configdir=/usr/local/samba/etc I see errors like the following in /var/samba/log.smbd: [2001/11/10 22:58:53, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342)

I cannot mount my Samba shares. I could, then I rebooted my device, and now I no longer can. The .conf file has not been changed in over a year. Here is the output of the log file: -bash-2.05b$ cat log.192.168.1.147 [2011/08/23 00:41:10, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(662) tdb(/opt/local/var/locks/sessionid.tdb): expand_file to 20480 failed (No space left on device) [2011/08/23 00:41:10, 1]

Hi! I've been fighting with Samba for over a week now and I can't seem to work it out. It all started when I installed the standard samba (2.2.1a-4) which came with RH7.2. I ran "smbstatus" and got the following error: Failed to open byte range locking database ERROR: Failed to initialise locking database Can't initialise locking module - exiting. I've tried the

Hi all, i am trying to run Samba 2.2.3a under a RedHat 7.2 i386 machine. After i compiled and installed the packages, i made a smb.conf up. Just some standard stuff nothing special. Now, when i start smbd and then check it with smbstatus it gives me this error : Samba version 2.2.3a Service uid gid pid machine ---------------------------------------------- tdb((null)): tdb_open_ex: could not

Hello, I am using Red-hat Linux Application Server 3.0. I have installed and successfully configured samba server & thus able to connect from windows m/c....It works perfectly fine. But when I install our product( Its a java application and one kernel loadable module) on the same machine The samba server does not restart. Following are the messages in /var/log/samba/smbd.log. after

RHEL 5.1, dovecot 1.0.rc15 on a x86 system. dovecot -n says [root at dg mail]# dovecot -n # /etc/dovecot.conf protocols: pop3 pop3s login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login login_process_size: 64 first_valid_uid: 100 mail_executable: /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugin_dir: /usr/lib64/dovecot/pop3 auth default: passdb: driver: pam userdb:

Hello. In our samba configuration, the lock directory is located on an NFS mount. It seems that for some reason this causes many problems: Some applications fail to save files properly (eg matlab), some applications fail to print (eg acrobat reader), and each time those application fail, we got a message on the log saying [2004/02/16 10:19:35, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724)

As I posted a few days ago, >> When I try to browse from, say, my Win2K desktop, I get >> >> Windows is not accessible >> The Network Name cannot be found. >> >> But it _is_ accessible. SAMBA can still _see_ everything just fine - all >> the shares show up; all the printers work. It's just that nobody can >> browse. I've since gone

Hello, In regards to this thread: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-September/111158.html I might be seeing a similar compatibility with this call is on Virtuozzo based system. > cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike) > uname -a Linux hostname 2.6.8-022stab078.9-enterprise #1 SMP Thu Jun 8 12:38:51 MSD 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux > mount /dev/vzfs on /

I'm trying to set up Windows browsing between subnets. I've set up a domain master/WINS server on the .0 subnet, and local masters on the .42 and .254 subnets, and I'm running into the above error on one - just one - of the subnets. The strange thing is that I'm running exactly the same version of RHEL on another subnet - and I'm getting no error. 3.0.25 on RHEL5. The

Hi all,. I'm getting this:- [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1274) fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1314) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:(475) tdb((NULL)): tdb_brlock failed (fd=7) at offset 4 rw_type=2 lck_type=6 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] smbd/connection.c:(156) claiming 0 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 0]

Please, What's this? Please, please, how to resolve ? [root@neosaldina-lj003 samba]# more nmbd.log tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/cache/samba/unexpected.tdb (835,457947) is alr eady open in this process [2005/08/04 00:12:51, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/cache/samba/unexpected.tdb (835,457947) is alr eady open in this process [2005/08/04

I've been running Samba 2.0.3 on my dg/ux box for more than a year, without any problems. Last week, I upgraded to Win2000 Professional, and ever since have been getting the dreaded 'Account not authorized to log in from this station' when I double-click on the machine's icon in 'My Network Places'. Normally, I've seen this as a password encryption problem - but I get

Some times I have in log : [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] lib/gencache.c:gencache_init(59) Opening cache file at /var/lock/samba/gencache.tdb [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724) tdb(unnamed): tdb_brlock failed (fd=12) at offset 4 rw_type=1 lck_type=13: Ressource temporairement non disponible [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] libsmb/namecache.c:namecache_enable(58) namecache_enable:

[CC to Debian package maintainer] Hi there, I'm still experiencing this worrysome tdb corruption even after I upgraded to 2.2.5. I built this package myself from the officially released 2.2.5 source. Here's a log snippet: Aug 3 11:15:04 Server smbd[23307]: [2002/08/03 11:15:04, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(492) Aug 3 11:15:04 Server smbd[23307]: tdb(/var/run/samba/connections.tdb):

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I was running a netbench performance test against Samba 3.0.11, and the test has not been able to complete fully. The samba logs contain lines such as this: [2005/02/28 11:35:23, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(645) ~ slave16 (192.168.133.116) connect to service netbench initially as user BENCHLAB+slave16 (uid=10016, gid=10001) (pid