similar to: ACLs, admin equivalent account, and file ownership.

I've seen some mention of winbindd getting into a state where it cannot connect to the pipe in /tmp/.winbind and, if the directory is removed, will not create /tmp/.winbind/pipe. I've also started seeing this behavior. I've looked at the code and I cannot figure out why this happens. Does anyone out there know why this is happening? How to work around it? If it is on the TODO list of

Here's my setup: - Single Mac OS X Panther client w/ latest patches. - Single Windows NT4 w/ latest SPs client. - Debian stable Samba server(2.2.3a-13) w/ custom 2.4.26 kernel. Oplocks enabled. - Cisco 2950 - All nodes 100Mb and everything on the same switch. - HP DL360 w/ 2.8GHz hyper-threaded processor and 1GB of memory. - HP

Hello, I have the following setup: SuSE 9.1 with samba and winbind installed. On the other side is a nt4 domain. I can join the domain with "net rpc join DOMAIN -U administrator". wbinfo -u shows me alle the users etc. I integrated the pam_winbind.so in my pam configuration and users can login with their nt login and password. Everything works fine. After a while it seems that

Hi all, I am working on a project in Rails for my senior seminar class. I am fairly new to Rails but I have done a major project, so I know a little. The one thing I cannot find however is a way to make the html code that is output look any cleaner. So, I was wondering if there was a function/library/extension that worked like PHP beautify. Thanks for your input in this matter. I am sure I will

Hi, Is it possible with samba to enforce the inheritance of group ownership on a per-directory basis, for files moved without copying? My situation is as follows: directory 'a' has permissions: 2770 (drwxrws---) and has owner = 'root' group = 'a' directory 'b' has permissions: 2770 (drwxrws---) and has owner = 'root' group = 'b' As per

After starts with winbind -i, i get this error: Creating get_dc_name_cache entry for MOSFILM.RU Could not look up dc's for domain MOSFILM.RU Could not open a connection to MOSFILM.RU for \PIPE\lsarpc (NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NOT_FOUND) Retrying startup domain sid fetch for MOSFILM.RU returning negative get_dc_name_cache entry for MOSFILM.RU Could not open a connection to MOSFILM.RU for

In our current testing environment, we are using nslcd to get user and group information from the Samba4 LDAP server, using the last part of objectSid as uidNumber. The configuration is designed to pull down unixHomeDirectory and loginShell if they exist, but they default to standard values if they do not. nslcd on each machine binds to LDAP using a dedicated user account, nslcd-service, and

Hi, I've searched the man pages and the mailing list archives but couldn't find this answered: When a user is listed in "admin users", any new files that user creates are owned by "root". Can this be prevented? (Is there a configuration directive I missed?) I would like the "admin users" to still be all-powerful, but have new files created under their own

Hello, I currently have a problem : There is a domain administrators group which I filled as "admin users" in smb.conf. They can do what they want on files, that's fine. Problem is the files they create are owned by root. Let's explain why this is a problem for me : - People in this group can't access their files in an unix way (ftp, shell, ...) - If one of them get removed

After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work (yet). You need to use 3.10 for now. On 07/06/2017 12:53 PM, Anthony Valentine wrote: > I'm running this on CentOS 7.3 > > [root at glustertest1 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) > > > Here are the software versions I have installed. > > [root at

Hi All, I have a fix to this bug ( https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16454) and would like to submit a patch to the bug report on Bugzilla. I'd also like to start going through some of the other Windows-specific issues and start fixing those. The bug submission instructions indicate that I should ask here for a Bugzilla account. Is that still the correct procedure? Thanks!

Hello, When a user is defined in admin users, Samba will always do file operations for this user as root. In my case when these users creates a new file or directory root i defined as owner of the new files as well. When only accessing the files through windows, this isn't usually a problem, but once using linux again, this is a bit annoying.. Is it supposed to be this way? Is there any

Hello, I have samba server on windows domain, in ADS mode but have problem tracking files that belong to admin users, anytime new file created the default owner is root. For non-admin users its normal, newly created files have correct ownership permissions. Its possible for a user to go and take ownership manually from windows machine but its just inconvenient. Is there anyway to change default

Hey guys, hope you don't mind this forward email, because I have been reading the 'flashpluginwrapper problem.' subject. The bug is in the linux_base, but nobody seem to check on this in the freebsd-ports. Looks like Brandon D. Valentine might needs to create a PR to get the better attention and keep the track. Cheers, Mezz >Summary: > >This began as a problem report

Hello! I am attempting to setup a Gluster install using Ganesha for NFS using the guide found here http://blog.gluster.org/2015/10/linux-scale-out-nfsv4-using-nfs-ganesha-and-glusterfs-one-step-at-a-time/ The Gluster portion is working fine, however when I try to setup Ganesha I have a problem. The guide says to run 'gluster nfs-ganesha enable' however when I do, I get the following

I''m an experienced PHP programmer (don''t know Ruby yet), and I''m playing around with Symfony (PHP MVC framework similar to Rails) and I found myself asking if there''s really any reason to use it over Rails. From what I''ve seen just about every feature in Rails is superior except one very important thing - Symfony''s admin generator. This is

I've now spun up a second DC ready for a migration from an old DC. Just checking over a few things and have hit this problem: Objects created by Domain Admins members default to ownership by BUILTIN\Administrators. So, when JohnDoe is logged on as JohnDoe and creates a file, its ownership becomes BUILTIN\Administrators. I've played with perms for over an hour and cannot make any sense

Hi All, how can I allow an administrator to have permission to change folder ownership from windows explorer? The Samba server is an AD domain member server and I'm using group mapping not winbind for users and groups in Samba, I've tried mapping both the Administrators and Domain Admins groups to UNIX groups of which my test user is a member of but I always get a permission denied

Hi I've just installed Samba 4.0.4 on FreeBSD to test for the moment. Everything so far has gone very well: joining the domain, GPO's etc. However one thing that is happening which I find unusual, is the owner of files created by a user who is a member of the Domain Admins group as well as Domain Users. All files created by the user are owned by id 3000000 (which I believe S4 maps to

Hi Michael, On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:42:12AM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > From reading the original post, I get the impression > that the problem is associated to the share root directory. nope. It will happen with just any directory or file created from a non SMB client, eg mkdir|touch (or NFS, ...) on the server. It is also associated with files or directories created from Windows