similar to: tytso's readdir speedup patch - adoptable?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 70 matches similar to: "tytso's readdir speedup patch - adoptable?"

2001 Aug 20
1
[tytso@mit.edu: Re: Your ext2 optimisation for readdir+stat]
I asked Ted about his patch for ext3 and ext2 and this is his response. I am not sure if his post will reach lkml since it's sent to vger.rutgers.edu IMHO, With the amount of work Andrew has done to make ext3 usable for MTA applications, Ted's work would make ext3 even better for MTA apps sinc both Postfix/qmail use 'find' in their control-scripts and queue statistics program
2002 Sep 22
1
htree 2.4.19-dxdir patch
Hi there, : without index mount: root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 20000 real 1m10.501s user 0m0.240s sys 1m8.590s root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 100000 real 32m55.929s user 0m1.890s sys 32m2.500s : with index mount: root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles foo 20000 real 1m8.428s user 0m0.350s sys 1m6.780s root@codeman:[/test] # time randfiles
2008 Jan 14
1
[PATCH] virtio_rng: adopt driver to newest virtio code
Rusty, This patch changes the virtio_rng to a callback without a return value. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> --- drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: kvm/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c =================================================================== ---
2018 Apr 19
1
Gluster's proposal to adopt GPL cure enforcement
Hi all, Following the lines of Red Hat's announcement for commitment for better open-source model, along with many other companies (lead by Facebook/Google/IBM) [1], Gluster project is also proposing to have the COMMITMENT statement in its project. While we discuss about the same here, a RFC patch is submitted to review. [2] [1] -
2008 Jan 14
1
[PATCH] virtio_rng: adopt driver to newest virtio code
Rusty, This patch changes the virtio_rng to a callback without a return value. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> --- drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: kvm/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c =================================================================== ---
2010 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] glasgow haskell appears to be adopting LLVM
On Friday 19 February 2010 19:33:32 james woodyatt wrote: > Let us all now give a warm welcome to our new Haskell comrades! Hopefully Mono will be next. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
2010 Feb 20
1
[LLVMdev] glasgow haskell appears to be adopting LLVM
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > On Friday 19 February 2010 19:33:32 james woodyatt wrote: > > Let us all now give a warm welcome to our new Haskell comrades! > > Hopefully Mono will be next. > Mono has already used LLVM for various things. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2010 Feb 19
0
[LLVMdev] glasgow haskell appears to be adopting LLVM
On Feb 19, 2010, at 11:33 AM, james woodyatt wrote: > everyone-- > > File this under Advocacy. > > See this thread <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2010-February/018425.html> for more information, but the short summary is that they're deprecating their old "compile to GCC" backend in favor of David Terei's new LLVM backend.
2010 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] glasgow haskell appears to be adopting LLVM
Just to correct, the GCC back-end isn't being depreciated in favour of the LLVM back-end (as much as I would to claim it was). The GCC back-end has been on the list of things GHC developers wanted to remove for a while now and the larger reason its being done now is that SSE support has recently been added to the native code generator, fixing one of the last advantages the C back-end had.
2010 Feb 22
0
[LLVMdev] glasgow haskell appears to be adopting LLVM
On Feb 21, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Garrison Venn wrote: > Hi David, > > Your paper is linked on an LLVM site, but I can't give you the url as we are > currently down for maintenance. If I remember correctly it was under "recent papers" > off of the home site. It's here: http://llvm.org/pubs/2009-10-TereiThesis.html -Chris > > Garrison > > On Feb 21,
2007 Jul 13
1
about Samba Adopts GPLv3 for Future Releases
Dear Samba team, I read this message. http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-July/133609.html Can I translate Japanese and send translated message to Japanese people? -- --- Oota Toshiya --- oota at mail.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp NEC Computers Software Operations Unit Shiba,Minato,Tokyo Open Source Software Platform Development Division Japan,Earth,Solar system (samba-jp/ldap-jp
2015 Mar 09
0
Will rsync adopt Kerberos integration?
Hi, Will rsync adopt Kerberos/GSSAPI integration? It would be really good if we could establish password-less connections that adhere to user permissions. I am aware there is a patched version of rsync for this purpose, but it seems to run a few versions behind the main releases. Are there any plans to incorporate the work done there into the main release? (see http://jrds.fr/rsynck for
2006 Oct 03
0
How to get podcasters to adopt Speex?
George Ou wrote: > Ah, but speex.org should lead by example. Instead of posting wav files, why > not post the actual speex files as well? Then make it plaingly obvious for > people to download the plugins with links to the page you just posted. I post wav files for the same reason people have screenshots. Sure, I could download OpenOffice and try it, but it's nice to be able to
2001 Feb 27
0
[giordana@canada.com: Protux will adopt Ogg Vorbis]
----- Forwarded message from Luciano Domenico Giordana <giordana@canada.com> ----- Delivered-To: jack@icecast.org Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:07:52 -0300 From: Luciano Domenico Giordana <giordana@canada.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: en To: feedback@vorbis.com Subject: Protux will adopt Ogg Vorbis Hello, My name is Luciano Giordana,
2007 Dec 11
1
Nokia against the adoption of the Ogg technologies by W3C's HTML5
http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/Nokia.pdf [...] Anything beyond that, including a W3C-lead standardization of a ?free? codec, or the active endorsement of proprietary technology such as Ogg, ?, by W3C, is, in our opinion, not helpful for the co-existence of the two ecosystems (web and video), and therefore not our choice. [...] Charming. Now they call Ogg a "proprietary
1999 Nov 10
0
"Using Samba" adopted as official Samba book
The Samba docs just improved by a huge leap. O'Reilly have released "Using Samba" under an open content license. They have sent me the full sources for the book and I will be working to get it formatted to be useful as a good online resource as soon as I can. Within the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the book as the "official" book for Samba. We plan to keep it up to
2008 Sep 25
0
R Foundation adopts Certification/Validation document
The Board of the R Foundation would like to announce the unanimous adoption of the document entitled: "R: Regulatory Compliance and Validation Issues. A Guidance Document for the Use of R in Regulated Clinical Trial Environments" The updated version of the document, dated August 17, 2008, is available from the main R web page (http://www.r-project.org/) via the Certification link,
2008 Sep 25
0
R Foundation adopts Certification/Validation document
The Board of the R Foundation would like to announce the unanimous adoption of the document entitled: "R: Regulatory Compliance and Validation Issues. A Guidance Document for the Use of R in Regulated Clinical Trial Environments" The updated version of the document, dated August 17, 2008, is available from the main R web page (http://www.r-project.org/) via the Certification link,
2010 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] glasgow haskell appears to be adopting LLVM
On Feb 19, 2010, at 13:09, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 19, 2010, at 11:33 AM, james woodyatt wrote: >> >> Let us all now give a warm welcome to our new Haskell comrades! > > Very nice, care to add a GHC entry to the LLVM Users page? I'll prepare a patch that could be applied when the merge is formally released by the GHC developers. — j h woodyatt <jhw at
2010 Feb 22
2
[LLVMdev] glasgow haskell appears to be adopting LLVM
Hi David, Your paper is linked on an LLVM site, but I can't give you the url as we are currently down for maintenance. If I remember correctly it was under "recent papers" off of the home site. Garrison On Feb 21, 2010, at 18:55, David Terei wrote: > Just to correct, the GCC back-end isn't being depreciated in favour of > the LLVM back-end (as much as I would to claim