similar to: NTFS file streams and Samba?

Hi, I have spent the entire evening, trying to access a ntfs-drive in my linux-box from my WinXP-Notebook but I just can't get it to work (and it's 3:50 a.m. now!) I have put a 160GB harddisk into a linux box (LFS 5.1.1, console only) and mounted it: /dev/hdd1 /mnt/toffi ntfs ro,uid=christoph,gid=christoph,umask=022 0 0 To check wether the data on the disk is ok, I then put in a

Hi, I tried to compile the 2.6.9-22.EL kernel with reiserfs enabled. make fails as follows. anyone managed to compile with reiserfs successfully? CC [M] fs/reiserfs/stree.o fs/reiserfs/stree.c: In function `get_lkey': fs/reiserfs/stree.c:322: warning: return from incompatible pointer type fs/reiserfs/stree.c:325: warning: return from incompatible pointer type fs/reiserfs/stree.c:329:

Hello, What am I missing ? thanks ! -dikshie- @fisbum:/usr/bin$ uname -a Linux fisbum 2.4.18 #3 Tue Mar 19 16:55:23 JAVT 2002 i686 unknown @fisbum:/usr/bin$ mount /dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) /dev/hda3 on /usr type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda5 on /home type reiserfs (rw,nosuid,usrquota) /dev/hda6 on /var type reiserfs (rw,usrquota) /dev/hda7 on /tmp type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hdb1

Hello, To compile a custom kernel, I downloaded 2.6.29.1 from kernel.org and followed the tutorial at: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Kernel.org_Linux_on_Xen Used a supposedly working .config file for the compilation (generated by my provider to compile his xenU kernels), set /dev/xvd* device nodes both in the domU conf file (disk, root): disk = [

Hi - Xen cannot detect a PATA drive connected to my on-board promise 20378 K8T Neon MSI mobo. When I boot using a non exen kernel, the PATA is dected accordingly. Any thoughts? Following is dmesg from a regular non-exen kernel #uname -a Linux localhost 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 #1 Sun Oct 29 14:58:57 EST 2006 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux #dmesg Bootdata ok (command

I have a disk image file that was created using dd, makereiserfs dance, operating system files copied in directly with cp -ax (vi a temporary mount, and then dismounted). My domU configuration is as follows: -------------------------------- kernel = "/RAID/data/xen/bootsles10/vmlinuz-xen" ramdisk = "/RAID/data/xen/bootsles10/initrd-xen" memory = 2048 name =

Hi There, Version 3.0.23c-SerNet-SuSE Symtoms: extremely extremely slow, high processor usage, in the dmesg, hundreds of these entries... which direction should I go... ReiserFS: sdb1: warning: Invalid hash for xattr (system.posix_acl_access) associated with [NULL] ReiserFS: sdb1: warning: Invalid hash for xattr (system.posix_acl_access) associated with [NULL] ReiserFS: sdb1: warning: Invalid

Hi we had one of our mail servers , going on kernel panic mode ( not syncing fatal exception) ... cause /var/queue/postfix was on reiserfs part .. it has not been giving us any isssue quite some time , but yesterday and today it went on Kernel panic mode , when we hashed out the reiserfs part it booted properly .. we formated the part^ on ext3 later and things working fine now . Could any one

Hi, I''m trying to run Xen 3.0 with a file-backed VBD on a opteron system. Here''s my Xen config file (xenconf): # -*- mode: python; -*- kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-xen" ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-xen" memory = 1024 name = "Dom2" vif = [ '''' ] disk = [ ''file:/xendisk/vm3disk,sda1,w'' ] root = "/dev/sda1

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to security_inode_init_security(). Commit 572302af1258 ("reiserfs: Add missing calls to reiserfs_security_free()") fixed possible memory leaks and another issue related to adding an xattr at inode creation time. Define the initxattrs callback

>>>> Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >>>> >>> But reiserfs doesn´t support ACLs. Does it? >> >> Oh yes, it does. Big way. >> > ?? > > I was under the impression that if i wanted acls, i > should use xfs, ext3 (or jsf i believe) but NOT > reisersf. > > Am I wrong? Does (for example) SuSE 8.2 with >

XFS is the best filesystem. David Weinehall wrote: >On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:33:13PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote: > > >>On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 09:34, Peter Nelson wrote: >> >> >>>Hans Reiser wrote: >>> >>>I'm confused as to why performing a benchmark out of cache as opposed to >>>on disk would hurt performance? >>>

Package: xen-utils-3.2-1 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, There is a bug xen-3-3.2.1/tools/libfsimage/reiserfs/fsys_reiserfs.c, it is using "unsigned long" which is 64 bits on amd64 arch and 32 bits on i386 arch. This makes pygrub can't work on reiserfs on amd64 arch. You can easily reproduce it. A patch is included for fixing this problem. diff

This patch adds support for swap detection to fstype (to be applied on top of the previous luks patch). The patch is now against klibc's git tree instead of klibc-1.2. Signed-off-by: David H?rdeman <david@2gen.com> -- fstype.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ swap_fs.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --------------

>> > > Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >> > >> > Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different >> > way than other linux filesystems? >> >> It's not supposed to given the same instructions >> from clients but it appears to because perhaps it >> elicits different kind of response from Office. >> Maybe

Please be patient with my ignorance if what I am asking is meaningless in any way. I am not too technically knowledgeable about filesystem internals but I am willing to learn. (I thought of posting to linux-ext4 but did not want to intrude within the technical threads with my layman thread.) From Wikipedia > ReiserFS article > Design section: [quote]ext2 and other Berkeley FFS-like

I am trying to compile 2.2.20 with both ext3 and reiserfs (to easily migrate from reiserfs to ext3 :-) All patches merge nicly, but compile fails because "buffer_journaled" is defined by both reiserfs and ext3. I looked at the "2.2.14 ext3 + reiserfs incompatibility"-thread on the kernel list and figured out that renaming "buffer_journaled" in fs/buffer.c and

Unfortunately it is a bit more complex, and the truth is less complementary to us than what you write. Reiser4's CPU usage has come down a lot, but it still consumes more CPU than V3. It should consume less, and Zam is currently working on making writes more CPU efficient. As soon as I get funding from somewhere and can stop worrying about money, I will do a complete code review, and

Dear Listmembers, I try to work with samba (newest rpm for SuSE, 3.0.1.pre2, but that does not matter, the effect was there in 2.2.7 and 2.2.8a too) on an sufficient armed system (the system does not matter either, I have tried it on different machines) using ReiserFS (version 3.6.4-12). When accessing one share from one machine (i.e. copying two or more files at a time to or from the share)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 June 2001 13:05, Rick Sivernell babbled: > Doug > > Educate me please. What is the diff between ext2 & 3. I am using reiserfs > now and do like it. But I do like to have the stuff going, if I can. Be warned, I know nothing about reiserfs other than what I've read. short version: ext3 is a further development of