similar to: Samba 3 + Exchange 5.5 SP4

Hi. Applied it to 3.0.8, which still has the issue... Worked like a charm... Thanks a lot. Will it be merged with future samba releases? Best regards. Bruno Guerreiro -----Original Message----- From: Guenther Deschner [mailto:gd@sernet.de] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:08 AM To: Bruno Guerreiro Cc: 'Gerald (Jerry) Carter'; 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba +

Hi all. Scenario: Fedora Core 2 Samba 3.0.6 PDC with ldap Exchange 5.5 on Win2K SP4 Whenever a try to install Exchange SP4 I run in to a situation similar to the one reported in bugzilla's bug 1076 (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1076 ) and to this http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-November/001828.html Also found this on another list: ----- Begin quote ------------

We have a Samba 3.0 PDC and and Exchange 5.5 mail server, when we try to upgrade the exchange server to SP4 a Dr. Watson error pops up Dr. Watson Application exception occurred: App: exe\exupdate.dbg (pid=366) When: 11/10/2003 @ 10:17:16.218 Exception number: c0000005 (access violation) The error does not occur on a native NT 4 domain, and poses no problem on a

Hi again. After installing ethereal on the samba server itself, I've found this: WIN2K -> SAMBA LsarLookupSids2 request SAMBA -> WIN2K Fault: call_id: 4 ctx_id: 0 status: nca_op_rng_error WIN2K -> SAMBA LsarLookupSids request SAMBA -> WIN2K LsarLookupSids response, STATUS_NONE_MAPPED Once again i'm completely lost. Anyone? Best regards. Bruno Guerreiro -----Original

Hi Jerry - I'm just e-mailing you regarding the Exchange SP4 upgrade error when using a Samba 3.0 PDC. We presently have a Samba 3.0 PDC and using Exchange 5.5 SP4 without a problem, however we are in the process of migrating to Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 and are setting up a test network to simulate the migration. While installing SP4 on exchange I keep getting a Dr. Watson error exactly the

Hi, I have several Debian servers with puppet 0.23.2. Part of my manifest looks like this: class virt_all_users { @group { "andy": ensure => "present", gid => "1000" } @user { "andy": ensure => "present", uid => "1000",

Hi, I just installed 2 Win2K sp4 workstations on an otherwise working Samba 2.2.8a network and 2 of the 3 printers are showing "Access denied". What's up with that? The other computers that are working just fine are Win98, XP and Win2K NOT sp4. Here is part of the global section: printing = bsd load printers = yes disable spoolss = yes printcap name

Hi, I'm extremely confused about anchoring of patterns for per-directory merge files, as what I see seems to not be the behaviour the documentation suggests. On the receiver side I have rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version 30. On the sender I have rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29. I'm calling: rsync --filter='dir-merge /.rsync-filter' -avz --delete \ --numeric-ids

Hello, I am unable to do a graceful shutdown or reboot of SLES 10 SP4 virtual machines (Kernel version: 2.6.16.60-0.85.1-default) with virsh shutdown or virsh reboot commands. (e.g virsh shutdown "vmname" ). On issuing these commands there is no impact on the VM. Also unable to perform the shutdown or reboot operations from the menu options available on the console when accessing the

I've been experiencing an incredibly slow samba access from a Win2k SP4 client to a Linux samba server (Mandrake 9.0, samba 2.2.8a). It seems like the file transfer rate is not so slow, but the initial opening of files on the Linux samba server takes very long (10 ~ 20 seconds). The directory listing is also very slow. In the past, it took me about 2.5 hours to compile Mozilla-Windows

We are trying to install a 32-bit SLES9-SP4 paravirtual machine on a 64-bit SLES10-SP1 Dom0 host from scratch. We have two problems: 1. The YaST2 VM creation tool fails to create a vm if a network card is selected. 2. The initial vm boots from the SLES9-SP4 iso file, but then complains it can''t find the installation source. Here is the /etc/xen/vm/file (after manually editing for a

Hello, at this time we're using s. 2.2.8a (running on SuSE-Linux StandardServer 8 - Kernel 2.4.21) as fileserver for our terminal server environment. We ran into the 128 connections per client limitation and had to modify the MAX_CONNECTIONS-parameter in smbd/conn.c. Now we're planning the migration from s. 2.2.8a to s. 3.0.1. Is the modification in smbd/conn.c still necessary, when using

Samba Masters: I installed SP4 on a NT 4.0 workstation and now it cannot connect to any samba shares. I reran the NT4_PlainPassword.reg script but that did not fix the problem. Your suggestions / flames would be appreciated. Thank You **************************************************************** Leo Crombach System / Network Administrator Tropel Corporation Phone: (716) 388-3566 60

Hi, I recently migrated from an NT4 Domain to a Samba domain with LDAP backend. We use Exchange 5.5 on NT4 as our mail/groupware. All existing users on the domain appear to be using the Exchange Server without any problems. However, when i create new users they cannot access their mail box'es from Outlook. The Event log on the Exchange Server reports the following error : > A logon

Hi all, I have been using samba for a very long time and have just upgraded my 3.0.25b servers to 3.2.4. I have a bunch of BDC's located in different areas of the country and a PDC running at HQ. I'm using LDAP as the user directory and I replicate the tree to every site. Samba looks up users using the replicas. I also use netlogon scripts to mount drives and set the time when the

Is anybody running SAMBA with NT4 SP4 clients ? -- +-------------------------------------------------+ | Milan Bednar mxb@inel.gov 208-526-8640 | | MAILSTOP EROB M/S 3640 | | | | "FACT times IMPORTANCE equals NEWS!" | +-------------------------------------------------+

Hello folks - back on April 2nd I asked why my NT 4.0 with SP4 computer wouldn't connect to my old copy of Samba (1.9.16p9), while my neighbour's NT 4.0 with SP3 computer did just fine. This was in the case of a read-write share that only myself and my neighbour had access to under our user names. A read-only share worked just fine on both our computers. Thanks to Herb Lewis & Jan

Hi, I've upgraded an NT 4.0 Client from SP4 to SP5. Now I'm unable to mount a shared medium from the samba server, because the user authentication failed. After downgrading all things are well. Is this a problem of NT password encryption? I read NT 4.0 SP4 uses encrypted passwords already?! The samba server is running SuSE 6.1 with Samba 2.0.3. Thanks, Lars --

Hi all, I have been noticing for a certain time that the Win 2K with Service Pack 4 wasnt able to save its profile to a Samba PDC. Is this a known fact or I have a problem ? I am using 3.0.11 on Fedora Core 3. regards -- You cannot prevent the birds of sorrow from flying over your head, but you can prevent them from building nests in your hair.

I'm running NT 4.0 Terminal Server (Service Pack 4) with Citrix MetaFrame 1.8 on a PC, and Samba 2.0.3 on an HP-UX box. We've been having occasional problems with files not saving correctly, and also with files not unzipping or copying correctly. I suspect it's some sort of incompatibility between Samba and Terminal Server/Metaframe and/or SP4. For