similar to: No subject

Steven Vaughan-Nichols at Ziff-Davis said: | Unlike all other previous Microsoft operating systems, XP | Home will simply not work in an office network environment | with NetWare, NT, Samba, or Windows 2000 servers. Period. | You simply can't connect to the servers' domains or their | file/print services. Which sounds like they took the SMB client out... | XP Home also has a built-in

Almost forgot - diff need ot be appied only on FreeBSD 5 version of 550.ipfwlimit, but resulting file can be used on both 4 and 5 releases. On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:59:51PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Better version then previos, it will not break order of rules. awk version, it will work on all 4 and 5 releases, at least those, where IPFW enabled ;-) Also i removed check for

Collaborative Fusion has a number of positions we're hoping to fill in the near future. Specifically, there is an opening in the systems group. My understanding is that we're looking for an entry-level sysadmin who would help manage our growing network of FreeBSD servers. Locality to Pittsburgh, PA is a plus, but I've a feeling we could make allowances for the right person (can't

Okey dokey. I'll start setting things up. I think what I'll do is start with 1.1 (or the infamous and soon-to-be-released 1.2 :). Once that works, I'll probably put together a CVS snapshot version. I know LLVM currently supports ia32 and SPARC; is anyone looking at any other architectures? On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 17:30, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Al Stone wrote:

Begin forwarded message: > From: Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> > Date: 11 September 2007 19:26:39 GMT+02:00 > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86 > Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Hi Arnold, > > Thanks for the patch. Some questions

> -----Original Message----- > From: rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org > [mailto:rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org] On Behalf Of Lori Olson > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 8:04 PM > To: rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > Subject: [Rails] Re: Re: Oracle unit test problem in Rails > 1.1.2/Ruby-OCI 0.1 > > > Wilson Bilkovich wrote: > > On 4/11/06, Lori Olson

Hi Mr Tierney, I have noticed an error message from R 1.12.x's CMD check for a while (apparently prof Ripley completely rewrote CMD check in R 1.12+) e.g.: http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/2.7/bioc-LATEST/snpMatrix/lamb2-checksrc.html ---------------- * checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE Warning: non-unique value when setting 'row.names': ?new? Error in

Okay dokey, thanks :) On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a >> bug? > > I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly.

Hello, Anyone out there running a production network supporting PC and Macintosh clients using samba and netatalk. we are currently using NT 4.0 with AppleTalk-IP software. Sharing the same files with the Macs and the pc is a must. I read someplace that samba 2.2.2 supports Appletalk. Is this true? Thanks, Joe

From: "Biyala, Urvi" <Urvi.Biyala@bankofamerica.com> >I need to trim the world read permissions from the system sensitive files. I know that it would be safe to trim the permissions from many of the configuration files in /etc. But I was not sure if I could safely tighten the permissions form other system files. Does any one know of any documentation on this. Or can any one

I think the build should work now, could you try? You need both llvm and llvm-gcc. There are still codegen issues, but I don't think they'll affect code that doesn't use long double. On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Okay dokey, thanks :) > On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency

Hello to all, Its been requested that I stifle the /lib/tls warning given even with xen-friendly libc6 because init was compiled otherwise. I got the deb sources for sysvinit from Ubuntu, which build just fine. The last time I tried this I ended up breaking signals to init (even though /dev/initctl was there and 666) and could not reboot. So for a new server, I''m going to : Base

On Saturday, April 6, 2013, Jeff Bezanson wrote: > > Presumably the optimizer benefits from taking advantage of the > undefined behavior, but to get a consistent result you need to check > for both zero and this case, which is an awful lot of checks. Yes they > will branch predict well, but this still can't be good, for code size > if nothing else. How much performance can

Are there any other wireless IP phones out there other then the Cisco 7920?? -- James Moran <jmoran@potentialtech.com> Potential Technologies

550.ipfwlimit check in /etc/periodic/security takes into account only global/default verbosity limit and does not account for a specific logging limit set for a particular rule e.g.: $ ipfw -a l | fgrep log 65000 *521* 41764 deny log logamount *1000* ip from any to any $ sysctl -n net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit *100* >From security run output: ipfw log limit reached: 65000 519

I'm finding this a little strange. I'm putting together a mail server that will (someday, hopefully) serve a lot of email addresses for a lot of domains. To make life easy, each account name is the full mail name ... i.e "joe at domain.com" instead of just "joe" Mail is stored in Maildirs, and the user account information is all in MySQL. Delivery is handled by

Ben Lindstrom wrote (a very long time ago) : >The problem is in some cases the data being sent to you may be out of >order (thankful no sftp server does this yet). So reget/reput without RFC >clearifications can lead to bad file transfers. > >I'm trying to drag up in my mind which one was the problem... I believe >reput is fine since the client has control over the

I now get: /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/ arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/ Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/i686-apple-darwin8/ bin/ -B/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/ i686-apple-darwin8/lib/ -isystem /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/

Subject says it all. (I'm almost positive this is a FAQ, or that the information is online _somewhere_, but I just spent 20 minutes without finding it ... sorry if I didn't search hard enough) -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com

I recently upgraded to 20040408 on my gentoo IBM R32 notebook. I was using WinMX to test my wine install before the upgrade and all worked perfectly. ?I ran WinMX after the upgrade and it seemed to work ok (I did not test very deeply, just started and saw it got a connection to the network and shut it down). ?I then attempted to install MS FrontPage 2000 (My wife is taking web design in