similar to: No subject

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "No subject"

2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
network. I did read somewhere on the web (several years ago) of a guy who managed to boot windows from the net. With the start of Win 98/ME/ etc.etc it's not posible anymore. I currently use PXE to install machine from the net using bpbatch that works great only bpbatch is not really under developnt and the script language is a bit buggy. I see only one option to boot windows from the net and
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
are being offered by the server. You can check also what shares are being offered by the windows boxes the same way. I wonder why the other windows machines are not showing up in network neighborhood? Try sharing some things between windows machines. Maybe you have something misconfigured on the windows side. There is a script, findsmb, which comes with samba. First turn off nmbd (killall nmbd) ,
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
for this process is "root", that is correct. The PID 7247 is one of the users, but the UID shouldn't be "root" and should be the username that was authenticated during logon. Anyone have same or similar problem? and how do I prevent this problem from happening again? I would appreciate any help. Thanks. Will Sun wsun@jpl.nasa.gov (818) 354-2311 Return-Path:
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
read list (S) This is a list of users that are given read-only access to a service. If the connecting user is in this list then they will not be given write access, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no matter what the writeable option is set to. The
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
TEST 3 If you get a "connection refused" response then the smbd server may not be running. If you installed it in inetd.conf then you probably edited that file incorrectly. If you installed it as a daemon then check that it is running, and check that the netbios-ssn port is in a LISTEN state using "netstat -a". Note: You have xinetd not inetd on the redhat box. To avoid all
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
apply to this (security=domain) case, since auth is via the PDC. So, shouldn't winbind_lookup_sid() be succeeding. Should I be trying to track the failure in that code? In case it's helpful, ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows: libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40017000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001a000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40030000) libc.so.6 =>
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
and that access to the client should be denied. > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com> > To: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM > Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client? > > > > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
it were a Microsoft box... (Windoze is so stupid it'll never know the difference!) -----Original Message----- From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Fred Jackson Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:39 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: a question? Hi does the command line smbpasswd -j <domain> -r <PDC> apply to clients joining a
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path:
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
When I run smbclient 1. smbclient //LINUX01//homes -U test password is requested, I enter the password, and I get in 2. smbclient //LINUX01//homes -U Jane password is requested, I enter the password, and I cannot get in (ERRSV - ERRbadpw (Bad Password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid) 3. smbclient
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
remove unix password sync = yes Reply on a question.... http://www.mail-archive.com/redhat-devel-list@redhat.com/msg04223.html Good Luck, Ries Return-Path: <ries@franksintl.nl> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl [195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6771C4AC8 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 17
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
why the install is failing. Do in need to rpm -e on all the 2.07 packages??? Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B884C4278 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 22:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
... (port 138, setting options)... [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 3] nmbd/nmbd.c:(541) open_sockets: Broadcast sockets opened. [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 2] lib/interface.c:(85) added interface ip=141.43.132.161 bcast=141.43.132.191 nmask=255.255.255.192 [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 3] lib/util_sock.c:(832) bind succeeded on port 137 ... (port 138, setting options)... [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 2]
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
the files when you attempt to rename it. This is caused by Window's Media Player loading the file when you click on it. To work around this I had to go into Windows Explorer and change the folder options from "Enable Web Contents in Folders" to "Use Windows Classic Folders". This way, Windows Media player won't load the file when you click on it. Just trying to save
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts lines in your smb.conf file. Don -----Original Message----- From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: dns and samba Hi, I find that my samba server always does
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
Please note that Windows 9x clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this article. Therefore the protocol for support Windows 9x style domain logons is completely different from NT4 domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. Did you read this document? Let me know what needs to be updated and i will take care of it. Cheers, jerry
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
is turned on. Can anybody kind to confirm with me? Our network is using a mix of Win2k server, Win2k Pro, Win98, Win95 and WinMe machines, where the Win2k server is the domain controller and terminal service applications server and the Samba is a member fileserver of the domain. All workstations logon and mount the samba file services. We'd like to check if the problem could be solved by
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
to see the logs to check. Andrew Bartlett Samba Build Farm Maintainer -- Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au abartlet@samba.org Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com> Delivered-To: samba@samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F454E77; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 06:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
Are you using wins? Try lmhosts for the start? Are all machines on the same subnet? Just a few hints to start with ... Christian > > > I have absolutely no clue what I could do to fix it. The only solution I > can think of, is to downgrade to redhat 6.2. > > Your help would be greatly appreciated. > > Stefan Kaes > > portax.com GmbH > Zielstattstrasse 40, Geb.
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed by the SAMBA dev people.. Regards, Marc. Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com