similar to: No subject

And route print? Do you have any servers on the WAN? (or is everyone connecting to the servers THROUGH the WAN?) Can you see the samba machines at all in network neghborhood? What happens when you type in the UNC of a samba server manually? (i.e. \\SAMBASERVERNAME) I hope I can help you, and I'm trying, but I'm not a samba guru. -Dan PS. Please change your email type to PLAIN TEXT from

And route print? Do you have any servers on the WAN? (or is everyone connecting to the servers THROUGH the WAN?) Can you see the samba machines at all in network neghborhood? What happens when you type in the UNC of a samba server manually? (i.e. \\SAMBASERVERNAME) I hope I can help you, and I'm trying, but I'm not a samba guru. -Dan PS. Please change your email type to PLAIN TEXT from

share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and log.nmbd are empty. [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865) Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876) sesssetupX:name=[administrator] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)

cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path:

have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts lines in your smb.conf file. Don -----Original Message----- From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: dns and samba Hi, I find that my samba server always does

OK, I am confused and DNS is the reason. So, Comcast, 13 public IP's bound to my modem. Each public IP has a DNS name from comcast (they assign it automatically) like: 173.13.167.209 --> 173-13-167-209-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net I created a DNS entry at GoDaddy for 173.13.167.209 that is 'inhouse.theindiecompanyllc.com' When eth0 is alive, I see that it tells me my name

I am trying to get Windows XP pro to join the domain. I set the NTLM to version 1 and all the logs say that it is logging in correctly, but XP is telling me that the domain controller can't be found or the machine doesn't have a user account. I added the account. Also how do I give a non-root user privs so that when windows xp asks me for a username and password to join the domain,

For freebsd we use the attached patch for cups support. I was wondering if it could be included in 3.0. IT doesn't apply cleanly to samba-3.0 but I was wondering if someone could take a look. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org>

connect to it - wait about 2 minutes and then get 'network is busy' message. I suspect that my problems may lie somewhere in the multiple domains / subnetting areas, but I can't see where. Any comments will be welcome. TIA Harry Burgin Return-Path: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us

share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and log.nmbd are empty. [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865) Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876) sesssetupX:name=[administrator] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)

When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1 localhost

Hi, Cannot spot the debian binaries for 3.0.23b - please please please as 3.0.23a has some issues regarding domain users and I'm too lazy to compile my own packages Thanks, -- DanB

However.... When I try the command nmblookup -M LINUXSERVER querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 03:04:57PM -0700, Jack Moffitt wrote: > Icecast 2.0 and Ices 2.0 are both fairly usable now. > > I have set up a semi-permanent test stream for people to bang on at: > > http://i.cantcode.com:8888/ices.ogg > > Please report any problems you have. I tested the stream using xmms fresh out of cvs; it sounds great! I had some trouble connecting where

I have done a great deal of reading regarding the network is busy error, but haven't come up with an answer for one particular problem. Here is the situation. Two identical DGUX machines are sitting on a network. Both machines are running Samba 1.9.10 with no problems other than performance. Upon several recommendations about improving performance, they decided to upgrade to 2.0.3.

Can anybody recommend a good web interface for asterisk that actually works. I am looking for a web interface that can show how many callers are on the phone, should be able to transfer the calls and disconnect. I have tried using the flash operator but has been unsuccessful in making it work. thanks -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com

Ok, I've gone through the list archives, and there's a bunch of questions, but no answers. I'm referring to the Error: Network is busy when logging in from both Win95 (a and b versions) and Win98. It seems to never give this message unless the Windoze machine has been rebooted forcefully - it seems as if the samba server hasn't realized that the client has left, and is locking

net use * \\samba\mgerdts Debug level 10 says: [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(554) Couldn't find user 'mgerdts' in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(951) NT Password did not match for user 'mgerdts'! [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(961)

Here is some log output that occurs on the production during the process of issuing a net use command from the win95 box to the samba server. The connection reset by peer message appears immediately after the error 54 network is busy message appears on the windows 95 machine. (This is debug level = 10) [1999/05/18 18:21:00, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) Changed root to / [1999/05/18 18:21:00,

Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed by the SAMBA dev people.. Regards, Marc. Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com