similar to: Performance ext3/hardware raid

Hi everyone, I'm interested in variadic functions and how llvm handles them. I discovered that the Clang frontend is doing a great job at lowering the va_arg (precisely __builtin_va_arg) function into target dependent code. I have also seen the va_arg function that exist at IR level. I found some information about va_arg (IR one) that currently does not support all platform. But since 2009,

Greetings, I'll keep this as brief as possible: Is Redhat going to support ext3 or reiser (or both) in the next version of Redhat (I'm not looking for a commitment, just a roadmap)? I noticed (and used) the reiser utilities in the Wolverine beta (on a test box) to make reiser paritions, but upgrading to the 7.1 release failed as it only saw ext2 partitions. I understand that ext3 is

>> > > Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >> > >> > Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different >> > way than other linux filesystems? >> >> It's not supposed to given the same instructions >> from clients but it appears to because perhaps it >> elicits different kind of response from Office. >> Maybe

Two related questions. 1. When is the unsupported version of 2.6.9.22 likely to be available? ?? I need to access reiser filesystems so I?m currently running on the .11unsupported kernel. 2. Has anyone successfully compiled reiser into the 2.6.9.22 kernel? ???I am getting errors in stree.c but I can?t find a solution on the net? Thanks Daveh

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 10:54:41AM +1100, Matthew Geier wrote: > Frank Joerdens wrote: > > > > Greetings. I read in a samba list that the quota support is 'broken' in > > so-called 'linus' kernels > 2.4.3 and that one is supposed to use a > > redhat or 'cox' kernel (what the hell is that supposed to mean . . . are > > we having different

Doing a cursory Google scan on journaled Linux filesystems, it seems that the three ground-up journaled FSes: XFS, reiser and JFS all have their separate strong points but all compare favorably. Reiser does a better job with many small files...which would seem to be the reality of maildir formatted inboxes. Any comments on that? Any war stories, that is, any comments on reliability,

Hi everyone, I'm interested in variadic functions and how llvm handles them. I discovered that the Clang frontend is doing a great job at lowering the va_arg (precisely __builtin_va_arg) function into target dependent code. I have also seen the va_arg function that exist at IR level. I found some information about va_arg (IR one) that currently does not support all platform. But since 2009,

(It was suggested I send a copy of this to ext3-users, so here it is - note that I need this RAID going so I've rebuilt with reiser, but would still appreciate suggestions; the message was original sent to the lkml) Hi, I've just built an 800GB RAID5 array and built an ext3 file system on it; on trying to copy data off the 200GB RAID it is replacing I'm starting to see errors of the

> IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR-R" <stuart@bh90210.net> writes: [...] > I really did not mean to insult anyone, just I like choice too, > and I want to see that choice in RH distributions also. I guess we're just circling around the main issue here: it's great you really like Reiser and think it's k3wl or whatever, but this isn't the place to come tell us about

I've corrected my build and packaged GnuCash 5.8 this time. SHA256: d3f24a955547d30fa4116252d1bc35247117b6449cdedf51236b502f294cb436 Downloads: https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnucash/files/gnucash%20%28stable%29/5.8/Gnucash-Arm-5.8-2.dmg/download https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/releases/download/5.8/Gnucash-Arm-5.8-2.dmg Sorry for the inconvenience, but everyone who got Tuesday's

I am implementing Samba 3.05 (Suse Pro 8.2 Reiser File System) member server as a file server on a Windows NT4 network with one NT server (PDC). I am currently using WINS for name resolution on the network. Shortly after adding the Samba member server, I will upgrade NT 4.0 server to Windows 2000 (need samba server to alleviate some nasty disk space constraints). The Samba member server

>> > > ... On my PCs the mtime remains unmodified. >> > > It's a weird thing if it happens under normal >> > > circumstances ... But if it only happens when >> > > you fake the identity from within the Office >> > > programs, well, I wouldn't bother really. >> > > >> > I totally agree ! >> >>

Curious what folks think the best choice of filesystem is, specifically when used for Samba and regular Unix users (SMB+NFS access). I'm using Reiser now but its slow and doesn't work good XP attributes. I've also used XFS (a couple of years ago) and liked it but had some troubles with cross-platform Unix and the extended ACLs. What's the preference today? Thanks -- Eric A.

rruegner wrote: > i recommend using ext3, suse is good in reiser, > but with ext3 youre on the safe side. so, where to go with the 200GB of data already on the disks while re-formatting? This is the very last option I will try! (Why: see "ftp" below) > Upgrade samba to 3.07 from ftp suse.com. Done - no results > have you played with use sendfile = yes ( which works under

I'm having trouble with opening files on fat32 partitions with programs running under wine. The programs report that they can't find the file, even though it exists. I can open files on reiser and iso9660 partitions successfully. The simplest program I could find that exhibits this problem is notepad. If I provide the filename on the command line, notepad.exe tells me it can't find

Hi Folks: I am either using the multiport of the -m or --match option of iptables in correctly or there is a bug with it. Is anyone else using it with no problem? This is the way I am trying to use it: my_ports=21,25,80 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $wan_addr -p tcp -m multiport --dports $my_ports -j DNAT --to $my_internal_address I have used this in the past successfully but that was a

Hi, I am upgrading the tomsrtbt rescue distribution from kernel 2.0.39 to 2.2.20. Fitting a 2.4.x kernel on the floppy is not practical at this time. I am trying to support both ext3 and reiser filesystems. However, there are symbol collisions, it is impossible to use both. Is there any chance of getting the 2.2.x patch fixed? -Thanks -Tom

Hi, Here'a a question - is it possible to compile a single module (distributed in the kernel source tree) for the current CentOS kernel (2.6.9-5.0.5) without recompiling the entire kernel and all other modules. I basically need reiserfs3 (nb. why is it disabled? it's a module, you use it, it doesn't wreck anything...) and I don't really want to change the rest of the kernel, and

I would like to rebuild glibc specifically with the -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs to allow better performance with Xen. I'm using Centos 4.2 x86_64 on an Athlon 3200+. I'm using the 2.6.9-11.106.unsupported kernel for reiser support. My thought was to download and install the SRPM and then rpmbuild with no changes to make sure it works before adding the above flag. Unfortunately, the

Hi, happy after migrating from Courier to Dovecot without major issues, and saving 3 Gb of RAM after the migration, now I'm going to move everything to a 5 Tb RAID6 array. There's another thread on SATA and cluster fs, but for now I'm looking for the best filesystem in your experience. Currently I use Reiser, but I'd like to know if someone has worked with ext4 and