similar to: Attention newbies, an apology.. I WASN'T slamming you.

I've been reading this list for a few weeks now and I've given advice on questions that look challenging but I've deleted MANY questions like these: "How do I (easy question found in the documents)?" Though I don't count myself an expert, I've known enough experts to see that they _HATE_ it when you don't invest some time before asking a question. I too have

Dear Asterisk Community, I would like to offer my most humble apology for the enormous stream of mail messages currently battering at your mailboxes. I was honestly trying to help a worthy cause. Please blame me and only me. Neither Russell nor Josh are at all to blame for this. Nor, for that matter, is Olle. I am the guilty party. Please direct all anger/outrage/hatred/etc. towards

Oops, samba@lists.samba.org, not SALBA (: /dev/idal --- Chris de Vidal <cdevidal@yahoo.com> wrote: > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:19:56 -0800 (PST) > From: Chris de Vidal <cdevidal@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: oplock problems > To: Brian Johnson <bjohnson@jecinc.on.ca> > CC: salba@lists.samba.org > > --- Brian Johnson <bjohnson@jecinc.on.ca> wrote: >

My RedHat 8.0 workstation doesn't want to play nice with Winbind. The rest of our Samba servers (on RedHat 7.3) are working fine, and I am familiar with setting up Winbind. Samba: 2.2.7a (RPM from Samba.org. RedHat's RPMs do same thing.) Kernel 2.4.20 NT 4 domain I'd copied the pam and smb.conf from a working box in testing. Getent passwd and group works, BUT getent group

It makes it work! I was reading through the other messages on the list with similar subjects, and found this one: -----Original Message----- From: Matthias Rutzki [mailto:mrutzki@gmx.de] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:51 AM To: david.boynton2@asu.edu; bgmilne@cae.co.za; cdevidal@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] domain users in local groups with Winbind/Samba/Redhat It

Does anybody know more about groups? I am considering switching from NT to Samba domain and have made some test. Unfortunately I need to make two additional groups, except Domain Admin (one of them is Domain Users). Is it possible to make that with the stable version of Samba? And another, but not so important (for now) question. Currently I have a Samba server, providing files and printers

Hi, I have not yet found anything about this is the documentation. I have W95 and W2K installed and I would like to use both, if possible. So is there anyway to config wine so that i can specify it run w95 or w2k ? Some of my programs do not run and i think it maybe because they were installed for w95. thanks -- Never in the world does hatred cease by hatred; hatred ceases by love. --

I've just posted this to another list where we were talking about the same old issues we've been plagues with recently - I'd already posted some iptables rules, but added more to it for this... This script probably isn't compatable with anything else, but I don't run anything else. It's also designed to act on the incoming interface, not to run in a router, but

Hello, I'm installing 2.2.7a, or attempting to at any rate. I've compiled it from source using the following instructions: http://us2.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html Anyways, I've got it set up so that it works. Now I'm trying to get to a point where I can interface it like I have with a different Linux box that is working without any problems. When I did the

In one of your replies to the attention newbies... series, you mentioned you teach a linux newbie class. I'm interested (seriously, or sarcasm) in checking out one of your seminars. Where do I get information? Brad Peters brad@bepeters.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com

Hallo, > We have problems with printing after installing XP SP2. > In nearly every software it takes about 10 seconds to 30 seconds, if you > click on "Print-Button" and wait for the print dialogue window. > Extremly slow are programs like MS Word (30 seconds, when you open a > document the first time). same problem here. This a known but _unresolved_ problem for Samba

Ohh, hmm. I'll try it at work if I get some time and see what happens. I have a Samba benchmark I can run against one of our unused servers, and I'll try to have 16 "users" access the same iso copied and mounted twice, just as you're doing. I might not get time to do this next week, so in the mean time, a good troubleshooting technique is to strip any as many smb.conf

Hi, This is a message requesting help for the following problem: Printing Word 97 documents, stored on a Samba server, on an NT4 system to an LPD print queue fails under certain well-defined conditions, creating an empty file called 'Ne<number>:' (e.g. 'Ne120:'). The problem appears to be easily reproducable, as long as you have more than 99 print queues on your NT system.

Hello everyone, I can finally ditch Windows 7 in my Samba AD DC based setup. unfortunately, adding printers from my Samba-based print server (separate server, member in the domain) does not work. My print server shows up fine on Windows 8.1[1] and Windows 10, all printers are there and even copying the driver seems to complete successfully. However, right in the very last step when it configures

I was misconstrued as having insulted Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew. My words were twisted and misinterpreted and I feel that there is a need to explain myself and set the record straight. [b]What really happened[/b] It was sometime in Aug/Sep in the year 2009. The setting was in the Tampines Central office of Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd. I was having a ***verbal*** conversation with Melvin Lee,

I'm trying to solve this issue I'm having where using 'valid users = +unixgroup' just plain doesn't work. I can't find any /documented/ reason why this is so, but nevertheless, it seems to be the case. This is with samba 3.6.18, but seems to exist in all of 3.6.x and most or all of 3.5.x and perhaps earlier as well (see bug #6681). From what I can tell, the underlying

The apology first. If I've offended anyone, or just annoyed anyone, I apologize for that. I sometimes can go 'off the deep end' when I'm being sarcastic (an old habit from my news.admin days when I ran a Usenet site in the early 90's), and I'll try to not go into news.admin mode here in the future. Now, the question. I have a few ideas about how to do this, but am

On 04/27/2016 01:06 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> Not with a smtp that enforces DANE. > > I'm aware of how DANE works. > > The only problem is no MTA outside of Postfix implements it. > > You can thank the hatred of DNSSEC for that. > I never understood the hatred for DNSSEC.

Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:23:52 -0400 > Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Marko Vojinovic <vvmarko at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:15:30 -0500 >> > Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm curious what has

Hi all. I originally suspected this problem was with netbios (which I have disabled by default) and Jerry has helped me out a bit with but I've been doing some more digging and I think the problem lies back further than I expected. I was trying to upgrade from 3.0.7 to 3.0.11 so I've recompiled all versions back from 3.0.11 and the problem first occured in 3.0.8. The issue is with