similar to: UNIX/SAMBA file permission interaction

Hi Everyone, Sorry for the dumb question but I'm obviously missing something. One of our users found an odd behavior with SAMBA which I can't explain, but believe it to be related to the SAMBA/Unix permission mapping. Here's what happens: A file existing on a SAMBA share with unix permissions 755 e.g. -rw-r--r-- 1 root other 0 Dec 17 08:51 test.txt can be opened

Hello all Have a small problem. We use Samba as our PDC for a large amount of NT clients. We also use Sophos anti-virus to protect the workstations and servers. The problem basically is that although I can get Sophos to work properly I have to go to the actual workstation to install it from the server. Once I've done this Sophos works fine and automatically updates from the server.

There is an error in the chmod(1) man page. tingo at kg-v2$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #6: Fri Apr 27 23:50:55 CEST 2012 root at kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 tingo at kg-v2$ apropos ^sticky sticky(7) - sticky text and append-only directories tingo at kg-v2$ man 1 chmod | grep sticky 1000 (the sticky bit). See chmod(2)

Hi everyone, One thing that has always annoyed me about compiz is how rotate handles sticky windows. If you have a sticky window on your desktop, it will usually (always?) get focus when you rotate to a different face on the cube. This happens even when other windows have been focused more recently on the face you rotate to. This seems like silly behaviour, because sticky windows are (for me)

hi, We have, like in the years past, a table at Fosdem and I'd like to get some tshirts printed to hand out. In the past, the Linux Ninja's and Beards ones got quite a bit of attention ( and both were not brand spammy, which is always nice ). Reaching out to the mailing list for ideas on what we can do this year, with the caveat that I need to finalise by this weekend if we are to get

Hi everybody, I have a problem with the grid function in tk. I juste try to put 4 buttons like this: ------------------- | | | | | C | | A |--------| | | | ---------- D | | | | | B | | ------------------- A is 2x2 C is 1x2 B is 1x2 D is 2x2 but the code bellow dont work : require(tcltk) tt <-

I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the following configuration: [documents] comment = documents path = /shares/documents public = no writeable = yes printable = no valid users = @lan1 force user = docadmin force group = lan1 create mode = 0440 force create mode = 0440 directory mode = 1770 force directory mode = 1770 delete read only = no

Greetings all, I'm playing with asterisk and two Polycom VSX300 videoconferencing units. And I'm having zero luck getting video working over SIP. The two units register fine with asterisk, and with "allow=all" in sip.conf, the two units establish voice. But no video. And no obvious messages as to whats going wrong. The config for each is (they're numbered 201 and

Hi, am running: Redhat EL4.4 i386, Samba 3.0.23d from Sernet, ext3 fs Samba as PDC Someone's got the idea to have one big share with access managed by directory's sticky bit. This works perfectly well when normal XP or W2k clients work with their explorer. But: With 'allway sync', an app to synchronize for example between laptop and fileserver the program is somehow able to

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

Dear list members, Rich Heiberger reported to me last week that the Messages window in the Rcmdr GUI was freezing -- that is, messages posted to this window didn't appear -- under Windows and R 2.8.0. I was able to confirm this problem on three Windows systems, one using Vista and the other two XP. In each case, I used R 2.8.0 and Rcmdr 1.4-4 (the current version). The problem doesn't

Hello I am trying to create a 'dropbox' share, using the sticky bit and 'inherit owner'. By themselves they work, but when a directory is created in this share, its permissions are not quite what I need. Therefore, I try to use 'force directory mode' or 'inherit permissions'. However, whenever I do that, the owner on the newly-created directory is no longer correct

The following code should give me (at least that's what I think) two list boxes with their individual scrollbars. But instead both scrollbars stick to the same listbox even though they work as they should (scroll individual listboxes). When I remove all the widgets on top everything works perfectly. Any help would be highly apprecciated. ps: all subsequent listboxes and scrollbars work

Lo folks, I got a little question. Ive set up samba 3.0.0 + RH 8. And since ACL within samba only works on share niveau i wanted to implement POSIX ACL. I was thinking what is the difference between "full" access and "change" on a NT4 server. As far as i could think the difference is that "full" acces can delete a file and "change" can only change it. So i

I've attached the patch since I don't yet have an easy way to make git format-patch and kmail play nice together. The basic idea is during a rotate/other cube transform, 'sticky' windows stick to the screen instead of being redrawn once per face (its an option, the default is the old behaviour) Consider this, please, essentially an RFC - this particular behaviour was

I've been able to figure out on my own how to do what I need in the largely undocumented tcltk package, but I've finally hit a wall. I can't even think of any sufficiently specific search terms to use for this. I'm trying to make the widgets in my tk window resize when the window is resized by clicking and dragging on its corners or edges. Instead they stay exactly where they

Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I've noticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number

OK. Everything is going great for 4 years on my FC3 Samba Version 3.0.3-5. Now all of a sudden, when someone opens a Word/Excel file on a Samba share, it changes the user Owner to that user as well as modifies the permissions to r-x and leaves the group/permission bits/owner setting alone. I have the root directories for all shares with the u and g sticky bits set on, but it is not enforcing

Is there a way to provide "sticky" options to ActiveRecord::Base::Find ? I''m thinking something with a use model like: class Function < ActiveRecord::Base sticky :conditions => "lft > 0", :order => "lft ASC" end Where all subsuquent find operations have those options applied. In this case: Function.find(:all) Would actually be equivalent

Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile: