similar to: (no subject)

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches similar to: "(no subject)"

2002 Jul 08
0
(no subject)
Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))
2010 Jan 31
0
hepta valen t snugg ling initi ators optio naliz e
handc raftm an dost schem atics retyp ing poser s smoke neces sitie s nonre alist ic wooll ens verti cally bayan ihan actab ility total ises bayan ihan gauzy solon chak metas tasiz es inter surve y phosp hatid ic displ ayabl e invoi cing ridde r benig nancy eddys tone urim islan der awake ning piran dello parre l davit s displ ant losse s rubeo lar visio nal legen d
2002 Jan 22
1
ext3-2.4-0.9.17-2418p3 patch and 2.4.18 pre 4
The ext3-2.4-0.9.17-2418p3 patch applies with 0 fuzz against both 2.4.18 pre 4 and 2.4.18 pre3-ac2. Will it be included into 2.4.18 pre 5? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A) Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 "Debugging is
2002 Jan 29
2
what is patched and what is not?
I'm trying to pick a kernel for ext3. Looking at the web page (http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/), I see little that clues me in to the fact that "most" of ext3 is already in (some|most|all) of the 2.4 series kernels. Am I correct that most of the patches listed on the web page now are actually bug fixes to the existing ext3 code, as opposed to previous patches that actually
2002 Feb 04
1
LVM (1.0.2 ), ext3 and 'hot' snapshotting
Hello, all. I work with lvm ( kernel 2.4.17 + ext3-2.4-0.9.17-2418p3 patch ) but i can't snapshot a ext3 fs directly # lvcreate --snap --name snap --size +1G /dev/vgtest/lvtest # mount -o ro -t ext3 /dev/vgtest/lvtest /snap /mnt/snap ext3 can't work , ext2 work If I mount readonly the etx3 filesystem, snapshot-it, and remount rw the filesystem ( and ro the snapshot ) it work
2002 Jan 11
0
ext3-2.4-0.9.16
A small ext3 update. It fixes a few hard-to-hit but potentially serious problems. The patch is against 2.4.18-pre3, and is also applicable to 2.4.17. http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/ext3-2.4-0.9.17-2418p3.gz 0.9.17 12 Jan 2002 ------------------- - Cleanup from Manfred Spraul which provides better randomisation of inode generation numbers. - A locking fix which prevents possible panics when
2002 May 21
4
Bad directories appearing in ext3 after upgrade 2.4.16 -> 2.4.18+cvs
Hi, I recently upgraded one of my fileservers from 2.4.16 to 2.4.18 plus the ext3-cvs.patch that Andrew Morton pointed me to for addressing and assertion failure. Since then I have been getting lots of errors like: May 21 14:07:03 glass kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,0)): ext3_add_entry: bad entry in directory #2945366: rec_len %% 4 != 0 - offset=0, inode=1886221359, rec_len=24927,
2002 Jan 21
2
Assertion Failure
I got this.. The system was usuable, but not very. If I tried to access the ext3 volume, it would hang. Reboot hung too, complaining about too many open files. Any ideas? I have no idea what triggered it; this is a big file/web/mail server, with all of that on the ext3 volume. And I've never run ksymoops before, but I think I did it right. - Josh Assertion failure in
2005 Apr 26
3
Error using e1071 svm: NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call
Hello, As far I saw in archive mailing list, I am not the first person with this problem. Anyway I was not able to pass this error once the information I got from the archive it is not very conclusive for this case. I have used linear, radial and sigmoid kernels for the same data in the same conditions and everything is ok. This problem just happens with the polynomial kernel. I send the