similar to: FW: WINBIND configuration and NT Authentication]

Hi, Yes it's possible to authenticate users from win 2000 server with winbind. For me the PAM configuration was the hardest part. I used mandrake 9 and it has a realy good pre config. And if you want to modify the folder/file permissions from NT/W2k PDC then don't use ReiserFS as the filesystem. Use either EXT3 or XFS. Mayby the ReiserFS 4 will have the ACL support. I have had

Setup: Suse 7.2, Samba 2.2.6 Win 2K PDC Project: I would like to use winbind to authenticate users that do not have local accounts on the linux machine for access to various file and print shares. I have gotten winbind to successfully grab the user and groups from the NT box (verified by getent passwd). However, I have had little luck obtaining the permission based file share that I would

Hello all, I'm using samba 2.2.7a with winbind on a RedHat 7.3 (pre-installed by Dell) server, with an NT PDC/BDC, with the NT PDC acting as the WINS server. Everything works fine on the local subnet 192.168.0.xxx, but we also have an IPSec VPN set up with our western call centre, and users on the western office subnet 192.168.10.xxx can't login to the samba shares. They can login to

I am at wits end...So far it seems dovecot is light years ahead of UW-IMAP. Glad to have UW-IMAP behind me...well almost. My setup = Sendmail 8.13.4 with Procmail delivery to /var/spool/mail/<userfile> openssl 0.9.8 dovecot 0.99.11 I want to continue to use the standard mbox with all the user's mail stored in /var/spool/mail/<userfile>.

I recently moved an app. from lighttpd + fastcgi to apache 2.2 + mod_proxy_balancer + Mongrel. On lighttpd, I was using basic authentication with a configuration like this: auth.backend = "htpasswd" auth.backend.htpasswd.userfile = "/path/to/htpasswd" auth.require = ("/" => ("method" => "basic", "realm" => "My

Dear Folks, Using head of imaptest with dovecot 2.1, I am attempting to put a heavy load on the server, with insufficient success. I made 15000 user accounts, put them in to a file, one per line. Then I ran imaptest with ./imaptest userfile=../../imap-test-userlist-15001.txt clients=15001 pass=SECRETPASSWORD But CPU load is only reaching 20. I put an mbox containing 67 messages into

> On 03/11/2020 02:24 Oren Yehezkely <orenyny at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I am trying to find out if Dovecot API allows placing?a message directly in a customer's mailbox, without needing to send the email via SMTP. > > Thanks for?your help, > > Oren `doveadm save` is available from HTTP API, but seems to be missing from documentation.

Hi, Im using 2.2.x at the moment and I'm wondering should I move to 3.0 now. I need samba to be a file server in couple networks. What I need in all of them is to get the samba to authenticate user / group from winNT/Win2k servers. At the moment this doesn't work with the 2.2.x because my lack of knowledge. I have 3 weeks time to get this working =). If I can't make this I must

from another post today about a different topic, the reply said that nmd has some issue restarting with a service smb restart in redhat 7.3..which seems to answer my question as to why I have to do it twice... thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris McKeever > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 10:35 AM > To: 'John H Terpstra'; _Chris McKeever_ > Cc:

Hi again =) If I have got this right? When a samba is in a domain security mode and loses the connection to the PDC example NT4, it drops from security = domain to security = server mode. Is this information correct? And if this is true is there any way to get it automaticaly get back to domain mode when the PDC get back on line. And if this isn't true why does it disallow to change the

Hi there!! I 'm changing the distribution from Suse8 to Fedora Core3. I have installed a new PDC server with : fedora core3, openldap, samba, and smbtools (that was included in samba) All sw above mentioned were installed with fedora core3. Now, I have my server working but.. I can't add a new machine (wXP) to this domain server. All my configuration are ok (samba+smbtools+openldap),

There is a big difference if you are not running a pure rails site. I am doing auth apache-side because I serve static content, perl scripts via cgi and feed the mongrel pack from Apache. The REMOTE_USER variable value can be passed to rails using a technique described deep down in one of the informative pieces on the Mongrel website. Bill On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:54:07 -0700, Matte Edens wrote:

>>>>> Mikko Korpela <mikko.korpela at helsinki.fi> >>>>> on Wed, 18 May 2016 14:18:20 +0300 writes: > On 18/05/16 13:50, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>> Mikko Korpela <mikko.korpela at helsinki.fi> on Wed, 18 >>>>>>> May 2016 13:05:24 +0300 writes: >> >> > I get an error

Are there any plans to move the schema definition from migrations to the model, where it should be? Like og does, which I think is used by the ruby Nitro framework... ObjectGraph: http://www.rubygarden.org/index.cgi/Libraries/og_tutorial.rdoc Example code: [code] class Post property :title, String, :sql => ''VARCHAR2(32) NOT NULL'' property :body, String property

On 18/05/16 13:50, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Mikko Korpela <mikko.korpela at helsinki.fi> >>>>>> on Wed, 18 May 2016 13:05:24 +0300 writes: > > > I get an error when running "make check" after building > > R-devel r70629 on Ubuntu 14.04. > > Here are the relevant > > lines in the file

Thank you for the introduction to these recent changes, Martin. I think this was the second time I ran "make check" on that platform (Raspberry Pi 32-bit), and the first time (some months ago) it worked fine. So, that makes it kind of "suddenly", although I must say that my use of "make check" is very irregular. I compared code before and after the split you are

Hey guys, I''m getting a weird error when trying to test something like the following. It''s a model that is using acts_as_attachment but the weird thing is the equivalent Test::Unit case passes. Does anyone have any ideas? Best, Dave # it was a Test::Unit case first def test_should_be_invalid_without_file UserFile.any_instance.expects(:with_image).never

(Belated) thanks for the confirmation, Ista. I just reported this issue on the R bug tracker: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17412 Best regards, - Mikko -----Alkuper?inen viesti----- L?hett?j?: Ista Zahn [mailto:istazahn at gmail.com] L?hetetty: 7. helmikuuta 2018 17:05 Vastaanottaja: Korpela Mikko (MML) Kopio: r-devel at r-project.org Aihe: Re: [Rd] Possible bug in

I found the following link: http://rhems.sourceforge.net/ was wondering if anyone knows anything about it. ------------------------------------------- Chris McKeever If you want to reply directly to me, please use cgmckeever--at--prupref---dot---com http://www.prupref.com ---- Prudential Preferred Properties www.prupref.com

On 10/20/2015 05:18 PM, Michael Rutter wrote: > On 10/20/2015 09:51 AM, Mikko Pesari wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In the aftermath of the signing key expiring a couple of days ago, it >> seems that the Ubuntu repositories are no longer signed (there is no >> Release.gpg file present). This is not a good situation as users cannot >> verify the packages' origin.