similar to: Cant print from the windozes.

My Epson worked a while ago ,but not after installing samba. I'am using Cups 1.1 and samba 2.2.5 and have made this share for the printer. [global] printcap name = lpstat printing = cups load printers = yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba print command = lpr-cups -P %p %s lpq command = lpstat -o %p lprm command = cancel

Unstable windozes (hangs all the time) Major bugs in the printing system, mount and smbmount commands. Samba 2.2.5 is completely usable if you ask me. Crap I would say and should never been released. I consider to change to Beeweb although it cost money. BTW how do u uninstall the dirt?? using ./uninstall ??? ===== Investigating the Norwegain 4.th Secret ServiceThe multiheaded

Hola Knut, Thanks for your quick answer, but still having the same error. I have created the following users: (bppr-r40) IBM AIX Server: username: s670587 SAMBA SERVER (Above Server): smbpasswd -a s670587 WINDOWS 2000 Client: username: s670587 Have set all the passwords to 'manager', but still getting the same error message when I try to do a MapNetworkDrive

--- linux power <linuxpower2002@yahoo.no> skrev: > Dato: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 21:40:07 +0200 (CEST) > Fra: linux power <linuxpower2002@yahoo.no> > Tema: Fwd: SOLVED SOLVED:Connecting problem:Need > Help > Til: samba@lista.samba > > Yes it was the iptables firewall that was the > problem. > The port 137-139 were not opened as I thought they > were. I should

I have problem connecting a win 98 client to a samba 2.2.5 server on a linux box running redhat 7.2 I can see the server on the client but when I click the server icon I get \\lindoze is no accessible. At that moment I have scanned the lan card an I have this screen dump. 04:15:55.053492 kjersti.hauge.netbios-ns > 192.168.0.255.netbios-ns: >>> NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST;

Yes they all were sussessful except for the test I couldnt perform. I can see the linux icon in win neighborhood , but get server not accessible when I click the icon. It must have something to do with the ns lockup in the windoze. Joel Hammer <Joel@HammersHome.com> skrev: And, they all were successful? (I don't take anything for granted.) Joel On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 02:47:27PM +0200,

--- linux power <linuxpower2002@yahoo.no> skrev: > Dato: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:53:40 +0200 (CEST) > Fra: linux power <linuxpower2002@yahoo.no> > Tema: Re: [Samba] Mounting Share at Boot > Til: skidmore@worldvenue.org > > Have you tried smbmount "\\\\client machine\\dir" > '/home/barry' -o username=xxx password=xxx > in your rc.local file for

I just configured a server to use the CUPS printing system and have all my printers shared out by Samba. I made all the necessary changes to the smb.conf file but don't want to restart samba in the middle of the day since it is a high traffic server and don't want to break connections. Is there a way to just have samba load all these printers without restarting the service????

He could have changed the firewall setting in XP. --- "Dr. Bernd Zimmermann" <bernd@schaumburger-tracht.de> skrev: > Fra: "Dr. Bernd Zimmermann" > <bernd@schaumburger-tracht.de> > Til: samba@lists.samba.org > Tema: [Samba] XP-Problem - suddenly XP canot connect > to samba > Dato: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:48:11 +0200 > > Hi, > > we had

I've tried multiple ways to get into terminal server via WINE, but have had no success. I've got Notes, Service Center, Internet Explorer... pretty much all running smoothly... but when I try to use Internet explorer to get into it, I get a box that is outlined where the desktop is supposed to be (on the IE screen, and an object load error in the IE Log)... I then tried to run mstsc.exe

Hello, I'm new to Wine and I tried to run Pepakura Designer with it. I'm using osx 10.5.8 and I've installed Wine through macports as advised in the download instructions. I downloaded Pepakura Designer 3.0.3a because it was the the most up to version with a decent rating, however I've run into the DIB Init Failed issue: Code: ine Pepakura\ Designer\ 3.exe

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Pete Batard via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi Ady, > > Your insightful post prompted me to to a little bit more digging as to how > the Ridgecrop algorithm computed its FAT size, with the result of my > investigations presented below. > > NB: For those who don't want to go through this whole part, there's a TL;DR

$B$3$l$O<+F01~Ez$G$9(B. $B4IM}%"%I%l%9(B <cottage-request@eg.e-cell.org> $B7PM3$G(B Mailman $B$K(B $BAw$C$?%a!<%k%3%^%s%I$KLdBj$,$"$j$^$9(B. $B@5$7$$(B Mailman $B$N(B Email $B%3%^%s%I$N;H$$J}$K$D$$$F$O!$(B"help" $B$r%a!<%k$N7oL>$+K\J8$KF~$l$F(B <cottage-request@eg.e-cell.org> $B$X(B $BAw$C$F2<$5$$!%(B

Hi Ady, Your insightful post prompted me to to a little bit more digging as to how the Ridgecrop algorithm computed its FAT size, with the result of my investigations presented below. NB: For those who don't want to go through this whole part, there's a TL;DR near the end. For reference, the computation of the FAT size all done in the GetFATSizeSectors(), the code of which is at [1]

In the following text, I am about to use terms such as "inaccurate". I don't mean to question what some code does, but rather to compare the expressions against what I think is a more accurate one, in theory. I mean no disrespect, and I am not saying that developers are doing the wrong thing. In addition, of course I could be wrong (or type in incorrectly, or some formatting

hi, i have RedHat 7.3 as a server machin, and Windows XP pro as clients, i use samba 2.2.3a i can ping the server from client. following the manual, i created a windows user root with the password x and set the linux root password to x i added the user root to samba user list with the smbpasswd. i can see the server icon in the network neighborhood from the client pcs but i can't open them

On Thu, January 8, 2015 11:32 am, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, January 8, 2015 10:44 am, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:48 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >>> >>> A perusal of the contents of both the Fedora devel list and users list does not give one much hope that such a point of view would be tolerated, much less

On Fri, October 23, 2015 8:46 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > James B. Byrne wrote: >> >> On Thu, October 22, 2015 17:25, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> . . . Still, disregarding the part some of us dislike personally >>> (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates >>> - which all Linuxes are prone to beginning somewhere around >>> 2.6

Hi, I'm using Unix now for the last 2 years, so I'm learning everyday new things. Now I'm trying to configure Samba 2.2.5 (on Freebsd 4.4) so that w2k machines can logon to the domain. I added several users to smbpasswd (which are real users on the server. I would like to have "virtual users" which don't have a real account but that's an other problem) In several

On Thu, January 8, 2015 10:44 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:48 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> > wrote: >> >> A perusal of the contents of both the Fedora devel list and users list >> does not give one much hope that such a point of view would be >> tolerated, much less welcomed. > > Exactly. They don't care about