similar to: peachtree issue

I have a new Debian testing machine running the Debian Samba 3.0.5. Everything seems OK except that I cannot get users to have domain admin rights. I have Windows XP workstations. The workstations join and log onto the domain fine. A "net groupmap list" yields: server:/home/tnolen# net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) -> -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) -> -1 Guests

I'm running Samba with automount to automatically mount CDs in a server. These CDs need to be changed periodically, so I wanted to use automount so that they could be changed by the users fairly easily. We use logon scripts to map the CDs to drive letters when users logon. Unfortunately, it seems that having a drive mapped is treated like the drive is being used, so as long as there is

Has anyone had success with Appcac Plus (Dos) running on a samba machine? If so, any particular lanpak and version requirements? How about locking - I'll assume oplocks off (like NT). Thanks, Steve -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

FROM NT \\firewall.surson runs perfectly WHY??? root@firewall init.d]# ./smb status smbd (pid 12183) est? rodando... nmbd (pid 1397) est? rodando... [root@firewall init.d]# smbclient //firewall.surson/profile -Ucatena%motpock added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Domain=[SURSON] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.3a] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME

I've got an issue with remote files being deleted after the local file has been deleted. For some reason, this isn't happening. I'm running rsync 2.5.6 protocol 26 (yes, I know there are newer versions, but logistics dictates that I can't upgrade right now). I have used the --delete, --delete-after, and --ignore-errors options in all sorts of combinations. An example of the

Did someone of you find a solution for our problerm ??? I send you the documented as you asked it but I always got the same problems. I tried some possibilites for optimizing my system but I always stay with my problem for writing files. Reading files from my shares is not a problem but writing causes "buffers" problems with windows and windows says he could not write all the blocks.

In the samba domain I admin, one of the computers runs the Peachtree accounting software. Today, McAfee antivirus was installed on that box (not my doing) and now Peachtree keeps giving "Locking table limit reached" errors. Is this an error from samba, Windows, or Peachtree? Is there a limit to the number of file locks samba can grant at one time? -- Andrew Gaffney Network

Hi, I recently installed a new samba server to replace an older Novell machine. Now, we are having performance issues. I have installed many samba servers, and have not run into this problem before. Some background info: The server is an Athlon 1800+ w/ 512MB DDR RAM. We are using software raid on 80GB IDE ATA 100 drives with the VIA 82C3XX chipset. When mirroring the drives, we usually get

Hi, I'm having some trouble using rsync on W2K under Cygwin. We are using it to back up the W2K machine to a Linux machine. We are using the patched version of rsync 2.5.6 that allows it to run faster on NT/2K when calculating the changes. We can backup a directory without a problem, but in this case, we want to backup everything, so the directory we are backing up is \. We do not run rsync

You're going about this in the wrong way. Review the following piece of man-page: logon drive (G) This parameter specifies the local path to which the home directory will be connected (see logon home) and is only used by NT Workstations. Note that this option is only useful if Samba is set up as a logon server. Default:

I am having problems with storing Peachtree Complete Accounting on a Samba share. I know people have reported issues like this before but I have yet to see a solution. Is there anyone here who has successfully set this up (without getting the lock errors)? Any help would be greatly appreciated. -Donald

Has anyone succesfully gotten Peachtree Complete Accounting 8.0 to work using Wine? The CodeWeavers database has it listed, but there are not user ratings or comments. The latest version mentioned in the WineHQ database is 7.0. I'd love to know if it works before investing the time in building up a GNU/Linux box just to find out that it doesn't work properly. -- Aster

Hi All, I take care of a small network for a Tax an Accounting firm , We switched over from Windows to a RH ES server running samba 3.0.7 recently. Ok heres the problem there's this mutinous wretch of a software called peachtree , It intermittently (every 1 or 2 days sometimes every couple of hours) comes out with "Z:\Staus.dat Lock Table Full " Errors.. heres the help section

Hi, I got a similar problem with my test configuration. I am using share drives from my AMD Athlon XP 1600+ / 512 DDR RAM running with NT4 workstation and my linux server is a Slackware 8.0 with kernel 2.4.18 and Samba 2.2.4 running on a Pentium 166 MMX / 128 RAM / U160 40Gb SCSI disk. My problem is a bit different. I get well a lot of performance but my connections often break. So I can well

Good afternoon all, I have a few questions, and just joined the list and plan on staying. I had 2 Samba servers at work, both running apache, etc, that we develop on from work and at home over a vpn. My vpn upload speed is 25K, and at one time windows 2000 could save a document in less than 4 seconds from across the vpn using textpad. We recently downgraded our crappy 7.1 redhat versions to 6.2

Yes, I have tried that option with no difference in behavior. It seems it ignores that option when provided. Just for reference, I am building it on RedHat 5. I have never had this issue on any previous version of OpenSSH. I use the default configuration with only the changes specified in the RHEL 5 STIG applied. I appreciate the security advice. The root account was indicated simply as an

Hi all, forgive the question but is it possible to use PCI modem cards (aka winmodem's) as FXO/FXS ports in * ? what about external modems like the USR Sportsters? Thanks in advance, Bryan. Bryan Nolen Lead Developer http://Arc.Net.AU http://cdonline.com.au

I'm using rsync and cygwin to do some backups from Windows machines. I have been doing something along these lines: c:\cygwin\bin\rsync -aR -e c:\cygwin\bin\ssh.exe --numeric-ids --delete --delete-after --verbose --ignore-errors --exclude-from=/cygdrive/c/offsitebackup/excludes.txt /cygdrive/c/ root@remotehost This all worked well until I had to do backups of several mapped drives

We have many Samba servers in production. A few of them are having problems with file corruption. I've seen mention of issues with kernel 2.4.18. I know that 2.5.x has some necessary patches. My question is, what kernel is now recommended? Is 2.5 stable enough for production? Or is there an earlier 2.4.x without the issues of 2.4.18 that is more recommended? Trey Nolen

OK, I had emailed yesterday about an issue backing up a W2K machine using rsync under Cygwin. I was having trouble backing up the root directory, and I'm happy to say that the suggestion of using /cygdrive/c seems to have worked! Unfortunately, now I'm getting another error. The error is this: Invalid file index <some number> (count=<some number>) rsync error: protocol