similar to: winbind storing PID-1 in winbind.pid file. Cannot use wbinfo.

Gerald, No worries. This patch is required if your using Rational ClearCase and you don't want everyone to have access to it. It's to fix a brokenness (IMO) within ClearCase, and maybe other programs. Our windows primary group has 10k+ users... I will shoot it off to Rational, so they can provide it to there customers. I was hoping it could be applied to the main tree so I could just

Hello all, I've got a strange problem with Samba 2.2.4. I'm able to associate print drivers to printers (raw queue in cups). My clients are able to see that the drivers belong to the printers, and they download them, but as soon as the server reboots, I lose my driver associations and I need to once again specify a driver on the windows end. The Print server was an upgrade from Samba

Hi All, To clerify the problem, firstly I have to give you some details of our environment.. Linux Redhat 7.3, Samba 2.2.4, Win2000 workstations... We are trying to use Linux servers as file and print servers. Our client are Windows2000 workstations which will use Linux boxes as file and print servers... Problem with : winbindd Signal 11 error Suspect : When winbind starts, it can get all

I installed the printer patch on 2.2.4 on my Linux 7.3 box, reconfigured it (I think I did things in the correct order:configure,make realclean,run patch,configure,make,sh.makerpms.sh), created a new rpm, uninstalled the old samba, reinstalled the new rpm, fixed the conf files, reloaded samba and now my printers appear as "HPLASERJET on _smbserver". HPLASERJET is queue name which is

Hello Samba, We tried to use samba-2.2.4-1 with Rational ClearCase and had a problem using WinBind. ClearCase requires the primary group id to be set to the clearcase users group. WinBind sets the primary group to something like DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_USERS. I am including the patch we made to samba-2.2.4 to get things working. I have added two new smb.conf options: winbind primary group //

Guess I'll ask again . . . [Samba] Winbind and groups Bub Slug bub1slug@hotmail.com Sun Oct 13 02:35:01 2002 Previous message: [Samba] Strictly Private. Next message: [Samba] Winbind and groups Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Hi all, I'm trying to get a samba server which is all by itself, No Windows DCs, or even windows shares at all, to play nice

Hi, I want to use winbind for authentification. The samba server (solaris 2.6, samba version 2.2.4) is a member server in a W2K domain. I followed the steps in the Solaris-Winbind-HOWTO.txt of Naag Mummaneni. Joining the domain was successfull and wbinfo -t returnes secret is good. wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g shows the domain users and groups. But getent passwd and getent group only shows the

My samba server works in a NT 4.0 domain. The users can print fine (mostly Win9x). Now i'm trying to use Win2K workstation to upload drivers. I can see the printers, the properties are available but we i try to add a driver it fails with the following error : "Can't install driver Intel Windows 2000. Can't compleet statement" (translated from dutch). I've include my

It would appear that communication with the PDC is fine - all other commands (-t, -m, -s SID, -n name, etc.) work OK, it's just the group/user enumeration calls that appear to fail. Has anybody got any ideas whatsoever - I think it has to be a problem on the NT PDC side as, according to the debug log at level 10: 000018 samr_io_r_query_dispinfo 0018 total_size : 00000000 001c

When 2.2.4 was released, I updated my cvs and did ./configure and make (no special options). Since I came in somewhat early today and nobody was around I did the make install. Everything ran fine until I tried to load a particular file and I'm receiving the following error and unable to open the file on a network share. If I place the file on a local drive it loads fine. Permissions and

In the documentation the "oplocks = yes" option is give in an example, as the default for this parameter. However, I needed to turn oplocks off, and so assumed that the command "oplocks = no" would work. It doesn't, instead I found that "oplocks = false" does. There needs to be some boolean fixing done, or at least documentation should reflect this strangeness.

Hi, I'm working on a printing project consolidating a bunch of NT machines with a Solaris printing machine. I'm concerned about the scalability if I increase the number of printers from say 20 too 300. How does it effect the response time for looking up and changing device setting etc. Thanks Gunnar Gunnarsson

Has any version of Samba been tested for compatibility with the new Windows Active Directory? We will be upgrading our NT domain to 2000 and creating Active Directory. Currently our solaris samba 2.0.7 server is configured to authenicate users from our NT domain controllers. Will we encounter problems with the 2000 upgrade? Thanks in advance, Cynthia --------------------------------- Do You

I originally posted this issue with the heading "winbind: challenge/response password authentication failed". I was using the redhat 7.3 samba 2.2.3 rpm then. I've upgraded to 2.2.5, but all that's changed is the return message. wbinfo -a VENUS0+tassadar%torque used to get me: plaintext password authentication succeeded challenge/response password authentication failed

Hi everybody. I am trying to set up winbind (2.2.4; debian) but if I do configure with these options I get the following errormessage: Configscript: ================================== #! /bin/sh ./configure \ --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat \ --prefix=/usr \ --bindir=/usr/bin \ --sbindir=/usr/sbin \ --exec-prefix=/usr \ --infodir=/usr/share/info \

Andrew, Thank you for your suggestions. The real problem is Rational Technical support. When you pay someone 100k+ they tend to look for any excuse to deem you "unsupported". If you don't have your default group set to the clearcase user group, then technical support will decide that thats where your problem is! I am sure you know how that goes... I have solved problems

Hello I saw that samba 2.2.5a is out. Whats the difference with 2.2.4? Is there currently any problem with 2.2.4 or 2.2.5a? I want to uppgrade my server from 2.2.3a so i want to know if there are any thing that i should be prepared for. Ive heard that 2.2.4 had some printing problems? Is this true? /Alexander

Hi, is this true? Could anyone give countenance to this?! (i didn't have time/possibility to install/configure Samba 2.2.4 properly, so ain't got no chance to try it) Is there any news about when will Samba 2.2.4 be debianzed? THX Zsigmond > > I'd like to log the number of pages beeing printed from a host. > > > I haven't actually tried them but 2 new macros

Hi, I am planning on upgrading our Samba servers to a more current version (presently we have 2.0.6) Just wondering if 2.2.4 is the best version to implement, or if an earlier version would be more stable, e.g. 2.2.3a I ask this question because I've seen a few messages on the mailing lists suggesting errors in 2.2.4, but don't know if these are real errors or just people with a bad

I have been using samba 2.2.2 for quit awhile running with security= share in my company. I looked into the /var/lock/samba and found a growing file unexpected.tdb. Is there a way to trim it down while samba is running or do I have to start and stop samba? Is this an expected behavior? TIA Joseph Loo