Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "Re: Contents of Ext3-users digest..."
2003 Sep 01
0
"Re: Contents of Ext3-users digest..."
-----Original Message-----
From: ext3-users-request@redhat.com
[mailto:ext3-users-request@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 9:30 PM
To: ext3-users@redhat.com
Subject: Ext3-users digest, Vol 1 #955 - 1 msg
Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to
ext3-users@redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
or,
2003 Jun 25
0
Re: Ext3-users digest, Vol 1 #910 - 5 msgs
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote :
>Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to
> ext3-users@redhat.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ext3-users-request@redhat.com
>
>You can reach the person
2003 Feb 06
0
Re: Ext3-users digest, Vol 1 #793 - 9 msgs
It is most likely that your grub.conf file is _different_ than menu.lst.
grub.conf is just a dummy symlink made by RH under /boot/grub as well as
under /etc to make peoples lives easier. (Or harder as the case maybe)
If the contents of grub.conf is what you want to use for your bootup
listing..
cd /boot/grub
mv menu.lst menu.lst.bak
cp grub.conf menu.lst
rm grub.conf
#optional step
ln -sf
2001 Sep 09
0
RE: Thanks! Now I can recieve digest...
<html>
<body>
<img src="http://user6.orgio.net/orgiomail/button.php3?id=nbaxmzrwevbrrsfhjbl&user=redolent" width="1" height="1">
<pre>
Thanks...
Today I will convert my Linux Box file systems to EXT3...
God save me....
-----Original Message-----
From: ext3-users-admin@redhat.com [mailto:ext3-users-admin@redhat.com]On Behalf Of
2004 Mar 04
0
Ext3-users digest, Vol 1 #1063 - 1 msg
Hello ext3-users-request,
request
======= 2004-03-03 12:00:00 You writed=======
>Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to
> ext3-users at redhat.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ext3-users-request at redhat.com
>
2007 Apr 18
0
Ext3-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 10
Hi,
my program works well with fedora-2 .with fedora-5 it's gives following
errors..
get_it_i_say.c:549: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcmp'
cc -o giis dir.o file.o get_it_i_say.o group.o init.o inode.o main.o
searchnupdate.o uninit.o
inode.o: In function `read_inode':inode.c:(.text+0x202): undefined reference
to `S_ISDIR'
inode.o: In function
2002 Mar 12
2
ext3 filesystem corruption
Hi,
I've been experiencing intermittent filesystem corruption on a Compaq Armada
M700 laptop w/ IBM Travelstar 30GB drives (both the 40GN and 30GN models).
This happens mostly under RH 7.2, w/ ext3 filesystems, but I think it's also
happened under win98. All seems fine until power-down, power-up, and boot,
where the corruption is discovered. Searching these archives, I found that
there
2003 Jan 02
2
ext3 instability in RH8.0?
We've been noticing some problems with ext3 and, in our
case, postfix, that appear to come to light under heavy
disk i/o loading. A previous thread found here
(http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists/ext3-users/msg04189.html)
documents an identical set of symptons (and similar setup),
but with RH 7.2
The specifics are this:
1. Stock install of RH8.0 with postfix.
2. Linux mx 2.4.18-14 #1
2005 Feb 03
0
Ext3-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 1
Often enough, even on the periodic fsck's that occur every so-many mounts, the
fsck will fail and leave me in a shell. On the Debian boot, I am already
logged in as root and the root filesystem is mounted read-only.
I then need to run fsck -f [/mnt/hd....] manually -f forces.
It will go through a series of checks. Usually, it simply ends and I do the
control D and everything is clean.
2002 Sep 09
0
wine-users digest, Vol 1 #1245 - 6 msgs
-----Original Message-----
From: wine-users-request@winehq.com
[mailto:wine-users-request@winehq.com]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:02 PM
To: wine-users@winehq.com
Subject: wine-users digest, Vol 1 #1245 - 6 msgs
Send wine-users mailing list submissions to
wine-users@winehq.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
or,
2002 Feb 08
0
Re: Ext3-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 905448
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote:
> Ext3-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 905448
>
> We have received a request from 66.88.179.82 for subscription of your
> email address, <mhaque@haque.net>, to the ext3-users@redhat.com
> mailing list. To confirm the request, please send a message to
> ext3-users-request@redhat.com, and either:
>
2001 Jul 14
0
Re: ext3-users@redhat.com
Stelian Pop wrote:
> I found out that a new version of ext3-2.4 was available from
> the previous messages on this list, despite the fact that
> no 'official' announce was given...
I thought that the message,
https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-July/000804.html
, was the official announcement.
BTW, no problems here with 0.9.0. 1 week and some hours of
2002 Sep 09
0
wine-users digest, Vol 1 #1244 - 7 msgs
-----Original Message-----
From: wine-users-request@winehq.com
[mailto:wine-users-request@winehq.com]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:01 AM
To: wine-users@winehq.com
Subject: wine-users digest, Vol 1 #1244 - 7 msgs
Send wine-users mailing list submissions to
wine-users@winehq.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
2002 Sep 09
0
wine-users digest, Vol 1 #1243 - 4 msgs
-----Original Message-----
From: wine-users-request@winehq.com
[mailto:wine-users-request@winehq.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:01 AM
To: wine-users@winehq.com
Subject: wine-users digest, Vol 1 #1243 - 4 msgs
Send wine-users mailing list submissions to
wine-users@winehq.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
2001 Jun 12
1
Mounting / as ext3 when ext3 is modularized in 2.4
Hello,
I recently switched from 2.2 to 2.4 kernel. Each partition already contains
a journal. I tried kernel-2.4.5-0.2.9 from RedHat Rawhide, where ext3/jbd is
modularized. For the people who want to try this kernel, you first need to
rebuild it, and enable CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG. This solves an unresolved symbol
in jbd.o which prevents ext3 to load. (This issue will be solved in next
RawHide)
My
2004 Aug 10
1
Conversion / partition from ext2 to ext3
Hi,
I have installed Red Hat Linux 7.3 with ext2 file system and I have multiple partition. I converted them to ext3 using following command.
tune2fs -j -i 0 /dev/hdaX
And I modified /etc/fstab as below.
LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1
LABEL=/boot /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
none /dev/pts
2001 Aug 18
2
ext3->ext2->ext3 and unclean umount
Suppose I have the latest and greatest e2fsprogs.
>From reading the docs I understand that
1) boot ext3, clean umount
- you can remount ext3 or ext2
2) boot ext3, unclean umount
- you can remount ext3
- you can e2fsck and remount ext2
Does this mean that normal linux init script e2fsck will do it, in case fstab
says ext2? Or you should make sure to run e2fsck by hand with -f?
3) boot
2005 Nov 18
0
[2.6 patch] fs/ext3/: small cleanups
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- there's no need for ext3_count_free() #ifndef EXT3FS_DEBUG
- having prototypes for ext3_count_free() in two different headers is
nonsense
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk at stusta.de>
---
fs/ext3/balloc.c | 2 --
fs/ext3/bitmap.c | 8 +++++++-
fs/ext3/bitmap.h | 8 --------
fs/ext3/ialloc.c | 1 -
4 files changed, 7
2002 Jan 29
0
RESOLVED - RE: Ext3 problems possibly plauging me
Thank you to all who replied.
I am very happy (for you guys anyway) to report that this
was NOT infact caused by ext3, but rather a very very untimely
memory failure that occured during my convertion from ext2 to ext3.
It turned out that one of my PC2100 DDRs went south, and I'll
be contacting Crucial to deal with that.
Thanx again for all the help.
benr.
-----Original Message-----
2007 May 12
3
dbmail benchmarking
I thought I'd try benchmarking with dbmail (v2.2.4) to see how much
slower a SQL backend could actually be. Skip to bottom for the
conclusions.
Originally I ran the tests with the databases being in XFS
filesystem. MySQL's performance was horrible. It went 3-7x faster
with ext3.
MySQL 5.0.30 backend (innodb):
./imaptest clients=1 - append=100 seed=1 secs=30 msgs=1000000 logout=0