similar to: IP Binding

I have a Samba server running on an AIX 4.4.3 RS6000 that has been serving up files without problem. Recently, a pair of machines, both Windows 2000 Pro, haven't been able to gain access to any of the Samba resources on the AIX server though they were both able to previously. Other WinNT and Win2k machines can get to these shared resources fine, just not these two. I haven't found anything

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Blank Bkgrd.gif Type: image/gif Size: 145 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20020911/a89e1b74/BlankBkgrd.gif

No one had any other offerings here? I can't find anything that clears this up. And this machine can get to a Linux based Samba server just fine. Paul -----Original Message----- From: Paul Harlow [mailto:PHarlow@skld.com] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:29 PM To: Samba List (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Samba] Windows 2000 and Samba Sam: It wasn't pointing at the WINS server at first (the

I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers. A rough diagram of the network layout: ISP1 router (blackbox, routes subnet A, address on subnet A) \ -----------eth0(firewall)eth1---((servers)) / ISP2 router (blackbox, routes subnet B, address on subnet B) The aim is to allow the servers to use

Hi all, I posted here about this last week and still haven't found a solution to this. I have an AIX 4.4.3 system running Samba (not sure what version) in a WinNT4/Win2k environment. Some of the Win2k machines have mysteriously lost their ability to communicate with the Samba server on the AIX box but can still connect to the Linux Samba servers. I've installed Service Pack 2 onto the

Am 03.01.19 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:08:46 +0100 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> We are in the process of switching over shares from the old way of >> doing this to Windows ACLs: >> >> disable "valid users" "write list" etc >>

We are in the process of switching over shares from the old way of doing this to Windows ACLs: disable "valid users" "write list" etc and set ACLs via Windows Explorer ... And I struggle. I am asking for a way to "start ACLs from scratch". I ran "setfacl -b -R" on the dir on the samba server and did a "chown -R root:10513" to hand it to

Hello Community, Getting back to my previous post, here a a complement: - Having enabled sieve, I can store mails and create folder under the recipient - Having enabled public folders, I can move mail into them using a client (eg Thunderbird); security is therefore ok (actually I gave full control to the user) eg Public/Newsletters/SomeCompany - *BUT* running a sieve script to store to

Hi, I've created a VPN network using route mode with 8 nodes,for example 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.8 I've already set Every node's subnet to 10.0.0.0/24 and set forwarding option to kernel. After I deleted the default route table(ip route 10.0.0.0/24 dev tun) and added the following route options: ip route add 10.0.0.1 dev tun ip route add 10.0.0.2 dev tun10 via 10.0.0.1 and then I tried

Hi, We''ve been using xen with pc clones for some time now. But now the boss wants to get serious and start using real servers. We''ve been looking at HP. I got in touch with a couple of distributors for prices and much to my suprise, I''ve been told by one HP Partner that Xen does not run on HP hardware. (a ProLiant ML 150) He continued to tell me that he could offer me

Tinc team: I'm creating a vpn for my work laptop and vps and got trapped, here are my config files: on laptop: *tinc.conf Name = envy13 Device = /dev/net/tun ConnectTo = main *hosts/main Address = <my vps ext ip address> Port = 655 Subnet = 10.0.0.1/32 *hosts/envy13 Port = 655 Subnet = 10.0.0.2/32 *tinc-up #!/bin/sh ip link set myvpn up ip addr add 10.0.0.2/32 dev myvpn ip route add

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 ------- Additional Comments From mzurakowski-bin@data.pl 2006-02-21 20:06 MET ------- In ip route add .../29 it should be /24 of course. I think that source routing is setup correctly: I can ping/connect to my router through both interfaces from outside no matter how I setup default routing on it. Marcin Z -- Configure bugmail:

Can nsd 2.3.3 make load balancing? Example: www 600 IN A 10.0.0.1 600 IN A 10.0.0.2 600 IN A 10.0.0.3 Greet Sebastian Schikora

What's the current state of hardware support for Ogg Vorbis? Any decent players out there? I have an iRiver iHP-120 and am thinking about upgrading, any recommendations? Phil Hibbs. Capgemini is a trading name used by the Capgemini Group of companies which includes Capgemini UK plc, a company registered in England and Wales (number 943935) whose registered is at No. 1 Forge End,

Hi all, I''ve been using shorewall 3 (3.4.8 now) for a while on a simple gateway setup for my office. Routing is enabled only for a few hosts and all user access the internet thru squid, which is running on the shorewall box. I have a few other services on this box and some others on another server, but they don''t matter for what I need. Quick and dirty schematics to illustrate

Hey guys, Stumbled upon tinc a few days ago - looks great. I'm having trouble setting up a simple VPN between two machines that are unfirewalled, one is a physical machine and another is a local VM. I can connect to them via their existing LAN IPs and ping them without issue with < 1ms. 1) I have WinA (Windows host - existing LAN IP 192.168.137.1) and LinuxB (Linux host - existing LAN

Hi All, I''ve got server with one LAN card eth0 ip=10.0.0.5 default access t ointernety done through ADSL router gw 10.0.0.1 we got second internet access through another ADSL router gw 10.0.0.2 I want to send all e-mail out through gw 10.0.0.2 How it can be done? I''ve tried to mark packets: iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 0x1 and ip ru add

Hi, I'm using Vlans in my network as a way of preventing pier to pier communication - I only want nodes in the network to talk to the gateway (a linux box). I have successfully set up lots of sub interfaces using the vconfig too, one for each vlan. What I would like to be able to do is remove the ip address from each of these subinterfaces eth0.x and bridge them to eth0. I have successfully

Hi to all, +-------+ eth1 +-------+ | |==========| | ''network 1'' ----| A | | B |---- ''network 2'' | |==========| | +-------+ eth2 +-------+ A and B are routers # tc qdisc add dev eth1 root teql0 # tc qdisc add dev eth2 root teql0 # ip link set

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2