similar to: Urgent information (legal stuff) about the future of SAMBA

Just wondering if the decisions in the bnetd case might affect Samba at all? http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/doc/2004/bnetd_30sep.pdf From my reading, the judge is claiming that because the bnetd authors didn't have permission to reverse engineer the Battle.Net protocol, they breached copyright by reverse engineering it. Apparently in the USA you can waive your legal rights through

Hello, I was just so happy to have Diablo2 LoD in a 800x600 window under KDE 2.2.1 runing. It's quite smoth and even BNet connection on our privat Linux BNETD Server works. So just everything works fine (aint got sound, but I don't care), except for the whole keyboard, no input possibel. What's wrong with my Wine instalation? The debug output tells me about a language problem and

Hello, The next Asterisk Users Group meeting has been scheduled for tomorrow, January 14th at 11:30am. Its a new year and it's been two months since our last meeting. Meetings are held monthly on the second Saturday of each month, excluding July and December. Sound Choice Communcations is located in Bloomington Minnesota, just 1/2 mile west of the Mall of America. The address is: 7839

With all this DMCA crud, is samba a target for a IP case from MS Jason Adams

> I found this article: > > <http://www.copyright.gov/carp/webcasting_rates_final.html> > > but I still don't know what to make of it. Would we > have to pay $0.07 per song the DJ played? How about a > live performance with all original material? Also see: http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/webcasting.html I'm not sure what the rates are, but essentially

For reasons unknown to me, SER and subsequently a Microsoft Live Communcations Server 2005 seems to have problems, matching a SIP ACK request from asterisk to the ongoing SIP transaction, I have attached the complete log, but the essential lines are: 13(2894) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 13(2894) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 13(2894) SER: forwarding ACK

Forewarning... this is my understanding and advice. I am not a lawyer. First off, Jamie Zawinski has an article about this here: http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/webcasting.html > ================================================================== > hey josh, > i talked to [faculty advisor] today and was told we must stop our online > streaming. reasons for this rash decision

This is a mail in response to streamripper being threatened by legal action from Live365. The DMCA strikes again. jack. ----- Forwarded message from Fred von Lohmann <fred@vonlohmann.com> ----- Delivered-To: jack@localhost.cantcode.com Delivered-To: jack@icecast.org X-Authentication-Warning: penguin.onehouse.com: majordomo set sender to owner-pho@onehouse.com using -f X-Sent: 31 May 2001

so if you play only music that is released under the Open Audio Licence or gpl, then what is the status regarding replay and the payment of royalties? adam <p>On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Bryan Payne wrote: > Ditto Scott - you nailed it !! > > But the DMCA actually sets rules on requests and processing them without > being considered "interactive" - for instance the time

> >There's still a possibility that the DMCA will be dismantled before the > >arbitration is even finished. You shouldn't have to pay the RIAA > >anyway, and the fact that they are even involved is astrocious. > > I think having the DMCA repealed would be too much to hope for, but one can > dream right.. :) At the very least section 1201's days are

Ditto Scott - you nailed it !! But the DMCA actually sets rules on requests and processing them without being considered "interactive" - for instance the time frame allowed from when requests are made and then processed and actually air (minimum 60 minutes), to displaying your playlist - (can not be displayed public in the order of actual performance) basically as long as you never

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Jack Moffitt wrote: > > ================================================================== > > hey josh, > > i talked to [faculty advisor] today and was told we must stop our online > > streaming. reasons for this rash decision involve around a new law that > > was put in place over the summer saying that stations who broadcast online > >

> > I only started this so my ex-girlfriend on the other side of the world > > could hear a song (downloading mp3's was not possible for complex > > reasons but streaming audio was) > > > > but goddammit i'm going to make this thing work if it kills me. > > Obviously mission critical. :-\ > > Why not make the binaries on another box, zip up the

k' then. now our problem... We have (in the netherlands) a site which has the top 100 singles in Real. We have the copy bit on, still Warner wants us to only stream 30 seconds of each song. Even worse, our on demand 'radio station', which has thousands of songs on request is threatened too. Any idea how we stand? Maarten ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Moffitt"

At 16:30 6/9/2001 -0600, you wrote: >broadcasting online. Nor are they subject to the compulsory license. Right.. it would be nice to see online broadcasters treated the same way. >There's still a possibility that the DMCA will be dismantled before the >arbitration is even finished. You shouldn't have to pay the RIAA >anyway, and the fact that they are even involved is

Is there a way in UNIX to make a folder with read+write permissions for some group of users, but only allow them to read and write to the folder... not actually delete the folder itself? I have some samba shares, and directories inside them that I want to remain with their current structure and permission settings -- with many similiar group-specific files inside each folder, but I don't want

Oh to bad. I am currently working on some hybrid solution having mesos as an orchestrator combined with some kvm/qemu vm's. dcos does not allow this, and I wondered maybe if your kubernetes was limiting your options there also. -----Original Message----- Cc: libvirt-users Subject: RE: EXT: Re: KVM/QEMU Memory Ballooning Unfortunaltly it is not way what we can apply, due to the containers

Hi, I want to configure X on a NEC PC with an ATI graphic card. Usually, I do that by hand, e. g.: # init 3 # X -configure --> first draft # mv xorg.conf.new /etc/X11 Then I edit this with Vi, step by step. Usually, this works, but not for ATI cards. Here, the first draft only gives me a "vesa" driver... though xorg-x11-drv-ati is installed. But then, when I replace Driver

I have a ATI Radeon X1300 video card installed in a ThinkPad Advanced Docking Station where the laptop runs Centos 6.5. Upon Googling it seems that Centos 6.4 broke compatibility with the kmod-fglrx-legacy driver and that the only way around it is to downgrade X to an older version. However, the last note seems to be from before summer and I was hoping that there might have been some

Good Evening, The next Asterisk Users Group meeting has been scheduled for September 10th at 11:30am, this comming Saturday. Meetings are held monthly on the second Saturday of each month, excluding July and December. !! NEW ADDRESS !! Sound Choice Communcations has moved to Bloomington Minnesota, just 1/2 mile west of the Mall of America. The New address is: 7839 12th Ave S, Bloomington