similar to: quota support with Linux 2.4.x kernels

Well then, there you go. I really hope that I remembered to apply <stddisclaimer.h> to what I said. /Fredrik > > From: Kevin DeKorte <kdekorte@yahoo.com> > Date: 2002/09/11 Wed PM 04:14:27 CEST > To: Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de>, wine-users@winehq.com > Subject: Re: Is wine *always* mapping threads onto processes? (Was: Re: multiple instances . . . )

Yup. You're right. 1. Those are not processes since Linux 'ps' and 'top' reports threads just as it reports processes. 2. Threads reports the total amount of RAM allocated to the process it belongs to. (Excercise: what else could it report??) /Fredrik > > From: Nick Capik <ncapik@patriot.net> > Date: 2002/09/11 Wed PM 01:29:43 CEST > To: Frank Joerdens

(It was suggested I send a copy of this to ext3-users, so here it is - note that I need this RAID going so I've rebuilt with reiser, but would still appreciate suggestions; the message was original sent to the lkml) Hi, I've just built an 800GB RAID5 array and built an ext3 file system on it; on trying to copy data off the 200GB RAID it is replacing I'm starting to see errors of the

Hello, I am going to set up a new file server ("smb" and "nfs") machine for the local network of my former school. Therefore I've just downloaded and successfully compiled "linux-2.4.9-ac5" (including "disk quota support" and, of course, support for "ext3 file system"). I've read the statement: | ... | | The quota code in the -ac

Greetings, I'll keep this as brief as possible: Is Redhat going to support ext3 or reiser (or both) in the next version of Redhat (I'm not looking for a commitment, just a roadmap)? I noticed (and used) the reiser utilities in the Wolverine beta (on a test box) to make reiser paritions, but upgrading to the 7.1 release failed as it only saw ext2 partitions. I understand that ext3 is

Hello, with kernel 2.6.11.11 and above (I've tried 2.6.11.12 also), I get error in write on smbfs with Novell NetWare server. New kernel work correctly when I get services from other server (Win2k server or pro) I've tested the Alan-Cox's patch 7 also, but without succesfull. My previos kernel (2.4.24) work correctly. Smbclient work correctly with new kernels. Report error from

I have two sites, which are seperated by a campus network. Even with the new 'browse fix' release, I cannot convice the win 3.11 machines to do a domain login to the server in the other subnet. A single win95 machine in the subnet does every thing fine, domain login, network neighbourhood, the works. The win 3.11 machines can browse for shares on the remote server and connect fine - they

Hellow, everyone I'm from HuaWei, China. We are looking for the candidate of virtualization platform among several vendors. Learned from Oracle people, the latest version of ocfs2 has integrated reflink feature which was commited to the the linux 2.6.32 kernel. But as we know, the sles11 integrated the linux 2.6.27 kernle, so the relink feature is not avaiable on the sles11 platform. We

>> > > Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >> > >> > Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different >> > way than other linux filesystems? >> >> It's not supposed to given the same instructions >> from clients but it appears to because perhaps it >> elicits different kind of response from Office. >> Maybe

Two related questions. 1. When is the unsupported version of 2.6.9.22 likely to be available? ?? I need to access reiser filesystems so I?m currently running on the .11unsupported kernel. 2. Has anyone successfully compiled reiser into the 2.6.9.22 kernel? ???I am getting errors in stree.c but I can?t find a solution on the net? Thanks Daveh

The 9p-virtio transport does zero copy on things larger than 1024 bytes in size. It accomplishes this by returning the physical addresses of pages to the virtio-pci device. At present, the translation is usually a bit shift. However, that approach produces an invalid page address when we read/write to vmalloc buffers, such as those used for Linux kernle modules. This causes QEMU to die printing:

The 9p-virtio transport does zero copy on things larger than 1024 bytes in size. It accomplishes this by returning the physical addresses of pages to the virtio-pci device. At present, the translation is usually a bit shift. However, that approach produces an invalid page address when we read/write to vmalloc buffers, such as those used for Linux kernle modules. This causes QEMU to die printing:

Posting for a friend Begin forwarded message: From: "Geier, Florian" <florian.geier08@imperial.ac.uk<mailto:florian.geier08@imperial.ac.uk>> Subject: Fwd: readBin fails to read large files Date: September 1, 2011 4:10:53 PM GMT+01:00 To: Begin forwarded message: Date: 1 September 2011 16:01:45 GMT+01:00 Subject: readBin fails to read large files Dear all, I am trying

hiya! now, after linus handing over the 2.4 branch to Marcelo Tosatti to work on 2.5, alan seems to have stopped working on the 2.4 ac tree, therefore loosing the vfsv0 quota code in the recent kernels. does anybody know if alan is going to continiue working on the 2.4 ac tree or marcelo is going to include it in the 2.4 default branch? i don't want to wait for 2.5 :) best regards michael

Hi there, I use 3.5.2 with netbios aliases in security mode ADS. When I connect to the primary netbios name from a windows host I get the samba machine right away. Connecting to the netbios alias (which is on a differen IP address) I have to type name and pwd to get the connection. DNS entries are OK. Is there any way to get rid of the pwd question, I had the same setup with 3.0.20 for a

Hi Alan, Would you be opposed to including an InterMezzo patch for the ac series soon? It doesn't touch anything outside of its fs directory. It would probably help us get a few more users and fits nicely with ext3 being in ac now. We are also quite far along Reiser support for InterMezzo. Please let me know your thoughts on this. Thanks! - Peter -

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803 Summary: Security Bug: X11 Forwarding is more powerful than it needs to be. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs

Hi, I am using linux kernle-2.6.15, iptables-1.4 and bridge-utils-1.4. Everything intslled without any issue and i am able to enable the bridge and traffic is also flowing without any issue. But i did not see any traffic on the iptables forward chain due to which i am not able to control the traffic. Do i requie enable anything more to make the traffic pass through iptables forward chain.

Doing a cursory Google scan on journaled Linux filesystems, it seems that the three ground-up journaled FSes: XFS, reiser and JFS all have their separate strong points but all compare favorably. Reiser does a better job with many small files...which would seem to be the reality of maildir formatted inboxes. Any comments on that? Any war stories, that is, any comments on reliability,

Dear R users, I have got two samples: sample A with observation of 223: sample A has five categories: 1,2,3,4,5 (I use the numer 1,2,3,4,5 to define the five differen categories) there are 5 observations in category 1; 81 observations in category 2;110 observations in category 3; 27 observations in category 4; 0 observations in category 5; To present the sample in R: a<-rep(1:5,