similar to: install printer drivers on the server

Does anyone have any hints or suggestions on getting some JetDirect-based printers set up for bidirectional printing in Samba? We're using LPRng 3.8.0, ifhp 3.4.7, and samba 2.2.2 From the LPRng standpoint, the printers seem to be set up for bidirectional communication fine.. but how do we get Samba to allow bidirectional communication? Thanks in advance! Glenn --- Glenn E. Sieb,

Hey I know that this might not be the right venue for this question. But, I have a need, and the web page http://us1.samba.org/samba/support/us.html Is out of date. I need someone preferably a company I hope that can help me support a remote office in Tempe AZ USA. On the support page there is a listing of two company's they are both out of business. I need start a relationship for on site

I just upgraded to the latest and greatest samba in Debian sid (2.999+3.0cvs20020723-1), and And am now unable to have machine domain logins. Part of the problem was my fault a poorly done conversion to passdb.tdb where I lost the original machine accounts. I deleted all the original unix machine accounts. I mapped Domain Admins, Power users, and users with smbgroupedit this seemed to work

Hello all! I am running a samba network remotely and am unable to get the driver version needed for cad applications to work It's for a hp750c. I can push the driver fine. And previous versions (the one that came with 2000 and 2.65) worked; but were unsatisfactory for CAD. The version that my cad users want is version 4.64 but for the life of me I can't get that version to work. The

I have a win98 peer to peer network using a Samba server for file sharing. There 6 Machines on the net. I'm adding a XP Pro and cannot see the neighborhood network. I can get out to the Internet. I've made sure the workgroup name is correct and the XP is not set as DHCP. Our router is the DHCP. Is there something different about setting up the user for the XP Pro? I'm creating

Hmm...I've never tried it with a local user and a domain group. I've certainly done stuff like: chown DOMAIN+David:"DOMAIN+Domain Users" * and had it work before... -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Sieb [mailto:ges@lumeta.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:00 AM To: Samba Mailing List Subject: Hmm. Silly(ish) question re: winbind I know that winbindd allows Samba

Can someone explain why I get emails like this: > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces+ges=lumeta.com@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-bounces+ges=lumeta.com@lists.samba.org] On > Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 4:33 PM > To: Gary Hostetler > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Bought the book still lost > >

I almost afraid to ask - but, I have Samba installed and operational. When I try to login to http://localhost:901 I get a logon screen. I type root then the password. But it keeps comming back as bad usersnam or password. I know thjis is simple. But it's my fist time tyring to use samba and I cannot find any answers on the internet. Thanks for your help

Hi, Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly awaiting the same for 6.7. Thanks! -->Pat

OS name and version, MASTER SYSTEM has three APC smart UPS 3000 UPS connected via USB debian 8 "jessie" Linux pdxvhtst01 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.43-2+deb8u5 (2017-09-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux SLAVE SYSTEMS monitoring MASTER via IP debian 8 "jessie" Linux geaaetst01

MASTER SYSTEM nut.conf MODE=netserver ups.conf [TOPAPC] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto pollonly serial = "IS1309002707" desc = "TOPAPC" [MIDAPC] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto pollonly serial = "IS1309001233" desc = "MIDAPC" [BOTAPC] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto

Roger, The topology is: UPS TOPAPC, Data link to master, Power supply to master, slave1 and slave2 UPS MIDAPC, Data link to master, Power supply to master, slave1 and slave2 UPS BOTAPC, Data link to master, Power supply to master, slave1 and slave2 Shutdown plan: When wall power fails for any of the three UPS units, they continue powering the master and the two slaves. When two of the UPS

On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> said: > >> Hi, >> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for >> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly >> awaiting >> the same for 6.7. >> >> Thanks!

Hi, I've a question about a problem using a samba share in a UNIX AIX server. In my scenarious there is a fileNET server (running on a win2000 server) which use a samba share on a AIX sever for cacheing file, this share is configured for allow access to a particular user (pangol). It seams that user have access permission but an error is returned when fileNET try to write a file. Thanks in

If you can see the server, but not shares, you most likely have not published any directories. What version of the BE agent are you using? I've noticed 4.6 works well (the install actually works well and will walk you through the setup to publish the directories to be backed up). It's often easier to just publish root (but exclude /proc /tmp). Also, I've found out that in the hosts

Hi, We have a large (8 CPUs, 32GB RAM) x86 Sun server running x8664 Debian Lenny, with Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny6. It's a BDC and file server. I have noticed various entries in the log files that I'd like to understand better. Some machines are generating this: [2009/11/16 15:10:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2019) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented.

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54

Hi William, I got no positive reply since I made my posting. Only you and another guy, who made the same experience. No answer to the question, what functionality has "call_nt_transact_ioctl" and what effect on SAMBA has the missing of this procedure. Sorry, Michael William Soudan schrieb: > Hi Michael, > > I'm getting the same message in our samba logfiles as you

On a server that has been running smoothly since it was setup, and with no changes to configurations or network or anything, users cannot save a shared QuickBooks file. they have been regularly using, updating and saving to this file for a few months. All users are able to create and update other files in the same share. I have not confirmed if they are able to create and update new QuickBooks