similar to: [PATCH] ext3 doc: user_xattr and acl options are not on by default

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] ext3 doc: user_xattr and acl options are not on by default"

2012 Jun 19
4
FW: samba4 on debian squeeze
nobody any suggestions for me ? :-(( im running kernel 3.2. from backports. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: belle at bazuin.nl [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] >Namens L.P.H. van Belle >Verzonden: 2012-06-18 15:02 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: [Samba] samba4 on debian squeeze > >hai, >? >Im trying to install
2005 Feb 22
2
ext3 compatibility between 2.4 and 2.6 kernels
Hello-- We have a system where a central server formats removable hard disks, which are then booted in an embedded system running a highly modified RH9. The removable disks themselves contain boot, root, and data filesystems. The problem we've encountered after upgrading to FC3 / kernel 2.6 on the central server is that the 2.4 kernel in the embedded system cannot read the root filesystem,
2005 Jan 21
1
More help on ACL problem please...anyone...anyone...Bueller?
Hello, I am running Fedora Core 2. Kernel: linux-2.6.5-1.358 Kernel supports ACL: [root@atlas configs]# grep FS_SECURITY kernel-2.6.5-i686-smp.config CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_XFS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_SECURITY=y [root@atlas configs]# grep XATTR kernel-2.6.5-i686-smp.config CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_XATTR=y Have
2009 Jan 14
1
samba 4 alpha 5 with user_xattr error: system cannot find the file specified
Hi, I am trying samba4 alpha5 because I would like to use the feature of xattr for ACL. I followed the howto.txt comes with it exactly. I found that if I use user_xattr in /etc/fstab, I got "System cannot find the file specified" error very often (more than 50% of the time) when I try to create a file from a windows machine using share test (dir /data/test on samba server). If I
2005 Jan 18
1
Samba and ACL's
Hey All, I am trying to get Samba to work with winbind and ACL's on Fedora Core 2. So far so good as far as getting winbind to work with Samba but I am having trouble getting Samba to recognize ACL's. I am wondering if there is a command I can run to determine if my Samba install is ACL capable... Any ideas? Cheers, Travis
2015 Nov 13
1
winbind problems
On 11/13/2015 2:20 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 12/11/15 21:37, Dale Schroeder wrote: >> On 11/12/2015 2:59 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 12/11/15 20:31, Dale Schroeder wrote: >>>> OK, try this smb.conf, don't add anything else until you have >>>> getent working: >>>>> >>>>> [global] >>>>> workgroup
2013 Mar 11
5
samba4 AD DC as file server?
hi: I want to setup a small samba4 server with AD and file server function. I know that samba4 AD DC has no netbios browsing support. are there other missing functions, like winbindd or something else? and if I install two samba4 instance, one to "/usr/local/samba"(for file server), one to "/usr/local/samba-ad"(for AD DC). and give them two seprate ip to bind. will it
2002 Dec 11
12
File Systems - Which one to use?
We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near future with about 1TB of disk online. The purpose of this box will be for basic file and printer sharing needs. I am doing research on the different journaling file systems avaible in RH 7.3 and up (ext3, reiserFS, and JFS) and was wondering if anyone has had any real world experience with them (mostly reiserFS and JFS) and
2002 Dec 08
7
Has anybody got ACL to work w/ debian, winbindd in a w2k mixed domain?
Im seriously thinking about changing dist. due to acl won't work as they should with debian woody. Ppl also tell me this is because of some bug in debian. So, as the subject says, anybody got acl to work w/ debian 3, winbindd in a domain? If not, hello redhat.. Jacob _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
2011 Jul 09
10
Kernel Modules
Just compiled a custom kernel, but unable to mount a btrfs partition. It essentially says ''unrecognized filesystem''. What could be missing? # File systems # CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y # CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP is not set CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y
2005 Jan 24
1
RE More help on ACL problemplease...anyone...anyone...Bueller?
Extract of smb.conf : valid users (S) This is a list of users that should be allowed to login to this service. Names starting with '@', '+' and '&' are interpreted using the same rules as described in the invalid users parameter. If this is empty (the default) then any user can login. If a username is in both this list and the invalid
2011 Dec 09
1
Samba + acl,user_xattr
Hello All! Can't make Samba use acl and extended user attributes to save DOS file attributes. Please, help me configure properly. My steps on Windows XP: 1 - Open share 2 - Open property of file 1122/22.bmp 3 - Check file attribute: hidden 4 - Click Apply 5 - Click Close 6 - Open property again 7 - Attribute Hidden not checked. Samba dont save attributes!!! getfattr -d
2005 Jan 25
2
ACL not working
Hi I want to set Security to single file, but I keep getting access denied, I can change the Permissions that is alreday displayed, but I can add any user or group, after redaing the samba how to it seems I need POSIX ACL, but the book didn't mention anything about how to use POSIX ACL, Trying to set it from windows doesn't work, can anyone point me to document about POSIX ACL ? BTW
2004 Aug 20
1
from Newcomtech Co,. Ltd Help us.
How are you? Fristly I would like to introduce myself in a shortly. I'm a newcomer at Newcomtech Co,. Ltd. Nowdays I'm working at TDM40B and TDM04B cards. I have installed Linux hedhat 9.0 and Asterisk software. I have configured the cards. I typed asterisk -vvvc command in the command line and then asterisk give us "asterisk is ready". Now I have to configure my asterisk
2001 May 09
6
acl support
When doing ./configure --with-acl-support it gives me a message almost at the end of "checking whether to support ACLs... no". What am I missing??
2003 Apr 08
3
ACL: some maybe stupid questions
Hi. I want to use ACL on my RH-9.0 box (x86), so I got ext3 ACL patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/ and tried to apply it to the kernel that ships with RH (2.4.20-8). The patching fails on some vm file so I got a vanila kernel 2.4.20, apply the patch and compile it. This works fine. Also RH-9.0 precompiled Samba 2.2.7 works fine with ACL. I connected to my share with WinXP and do some testing
2006 Apr 02
1
Zeroing freed blocks
A couple of years ago there was a discussion on lkml under the thread 'PATCH - ext2fs privacy (i.e. secure deletion) patch' about zapping deleted data in the filesystem as a security mechanism. The discussion wandered off into how 'chattr +s' could be implemented and whether encrypting filesystems wouldn't be a better solution to the problem. I've been maintaining a
2000 Jun 08
1
Samba and Linux ACLs
Hi Samba folks, let me first introduce myself. I'm the guy behind <acl.bestbits.at>, the Linux ACL patch. (The other patch at <http://aerobee.informatik.uni-bremen.de/acl_eng.html> seems pretty much history BTW). A lot of work has gone into that project; we're approaching a very stable release soon... Now people keep asking me over and over again about ACL support in Samba.
2008 Oct 17
3
[PATCH 0/3] ocfs2: add security EA and ACL support v3
Hi, These three patches fix the problems in the version two. And them base on the Tao's patches: ocfs2/xattr: xattr improvement The first patch fix some problem in xattr code. The second patch add security EA support. The third patch add ACL support. Best regards, tiger
2001 Oct 28
4
Extended Attributes and Access Control Lists
Hello, I have today released an initial version of extended attributes and access control lists for ext3 (patch against the 2.4.13-ac3 kernel). Eric Jarman <ejarman@acm.org> has contributed a lot to this effort. Since I'm not very much into the innards of ext3, can some of you please take a look at the patch, and see whether it contains any flaws (and tell me which flaws)? Thanks! The