similar to: How it works

I'm guessing you meant to copy the samba list with this reply so I am copying it there to get you some more help. On Fri, 02 Mar 2001 03:57:30 Lech Pankowski wrote: > > Hi. > Sorry if you found my questions a bit too loud :-). > Using capital letters I tried to express all my frustrations. > I am a novice in the Linux world and trying to learn it > I gathered many papers

----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald Carter" <gcarter@valinux.com> To: "Brian Wasko" <Brian@BrianWasko.com> Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 2:55 PM Subject: Re: Samba Install Error > moved to samba@samba.org list... > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:39:37 Brian Wasko wrote: > > > > When installing the lastest

Hi Jerry, how can I download the SAMBA_2_2 you told about? Via cvs I only got the same 2.2.0alpha2 release. :( Gogo. -----Eredeti uzenet----- Felado: Gerald Carter [SMTP:gcarter@valinux.com] Kuldve: Thursday, March 22, 2001 4:36 AM Cimzett: bartus.l@bitel.hu Masolatot kap: samba@us5.samba.org Targy: Re: list of users in Win9x On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 04:49:02 Bartus Levente wrote: > > I

Here's the scoop, Well Jeremy and I found the bug last night. Unfortunately it will not be fixed soon. The problem is a bug in our client side code wrt oversized PDUs. When the needed size > MAX_PDU_SIZE in a parsing struct, we need to fragment the PDU and use SMBwrite instead of a single SMBtrans. Fortunately, this has not gotten us into big trouble yet. Jeremy knows how to fix it,

Jerry, Perhaps you could help me with a problem building a Samba print package. I've downloaded the drivers files I need from HP. I run the appropriate mkprintpkg.pl command, but it dies with the following output: [root@tux designjet]# /usr/local/imprints/bin/mkprintpkg.pl --name="hp1050c" --version=1.00 --display-name="HP DesignJet 1050c" -d "HP DesignJet 1050C

I will get a smbd process started. (If this is incorrect please let me know ;) But this morning I did a quick ps -ax on my machine and found *two* smbd -D in the process list. But as far as I know there is no connection to the samba server right now. I did connect to and disconnect from the server yesterday but I would think that that connection would have been released by now. Can anyone

Hi.. I'm running Samba 2.0.7 on a RH 6.0 box... Now, this box is using NIS for authentication, such that I have no entry in the passwd file, but show up with a `ypcat passwd`. I have made a group called 'swat' and have added myself to it, such that doing a `groups wkim` lists swat as one of my groups. I then `chgrp swat smb.conf` and `chmod 664 smb.conf`. Yet, if I try to access

Are you using wins? Try lmhosts for the start? Are all machines on the same subnet? Just a few hints to start with ... Christian > > > I have absolutely no clue what I could do to fix it. The only solution I > can think of, is to downgrade to redhat 6.2. > > Your help would be greatly appreciated. > > Stefan Kaes > > portax.com GmbH > Zielstattstrasse 40,

And route print? Do you have any servers on the WAN? (or is everyone connecting to the servers THROUGH the WAN?) Can you see the samba machines at all in network neghborhood? What happens when you type in the UNC of a samba server manually? (i.e. \\SAMBASERVERNAME) I hope I can help you, and I'm trying, but I'm not a samba guru. -Dan PS. Please change your email type to PLAIN TEXT from

moved to main samna list. On Tue, 01 May 2001 16:58:35 Patrick Goetz wrote: > > Here is a collection of problems I've encountered with > Samba 2.2 > > 1. Log files > > I configured Samba with --prefix=/opt/samba. Consequently, > by default, I get log files /opt/samba/var/log.nmbd > and /opt/samba/var/log.smbd . > > I'd prefer have a single log file

connect to it - wait about 2 minutes and then get 'network is busy' message. I suspect that my problems may lie somewhere in the multiple domains / subnetting areas, but I can't see where. Any comments will be welcome. TIA Harry Burgin Return-Path: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us

Rob, Don't know how this one got on samba-docs but I am forwarding it to the main samba list. Thanks. Cheers, jerry Rob Malpass wrote: > > So your Linux box can see your Windows machine but Windows can't see your Linux box ? > > If this is caused by upgrading to 2.0.6 I can't offer much help. Sounds like you've done the obvious things e.g. > > 1)

Folks, As a member of the Samba Team, I want to add a few quick comments and I'll follow up later with more details. 1) The Samba code has not forked. Don't believe any rumors people posted to the mailing lists. Rest easy. 2) There is no dissension among members of the Samba Team. Luke's letter was his own and as all members of the team he is free to move one to other

Please note that Windows 9x clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this article. Therefore the protocol for support Windows 9x style domain logons is completely different from NT4 domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. Did you read this document? Let me know what needs to be updated and i will take care of it. Cheers, jerry

more specific on what your problem is? cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back."

have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts lines in your smb.conf file. Don -----Original Message----- From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: dns and samba Hi, I find that my samba server always does

Panagiotis Malakoudis wrote: > > Here is my problem. I have a slackbox running samba 2.0.6 > that uses an NT wins server. I also have a DNS on linux. > Whenever my dns failes (for some reason) hosts that have no > entry on the DNS server but are indeed found on the wins > cannot connect to the samba server. They get "The network is > busy" and the smb log files

why the install is failing. Do in need to rpm -e on all the 2.07 packages??? Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B884C4278 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 22:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from

My response is below. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Carter [SMTP:gcarter@valinux.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 12:29 PM > To: Hawks, Steven L > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA > Subject: Re: Can Samba be Installed on a Solaris 2.6 operating > system? > > "Hawks, Steven L" wrote: > > > > Can Samba be Installed on a

remove unix password sync = yes Reply on a question.... http://www.mail-archive.com/redhat-devel-list@redhat.com/msg04223.html Good Luck, Ries Return-Path: <ries@franksintl.nl> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl [195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6771C4AC8 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 17