similar to: network extremely slow

Months ago there was a thread here about the implementation of a simple undelete-function (i.e: dont delete files, but move them to a folder). Is this this still a relevant idea or has this feature low priority ? thanx, peter ps: anyone knows about a 3rd-party software (propably on nt-side) that implements such a feature ? -- mag. peter pilsl phone: +43 676 3574035 fax : +43 676 3546512

I'm thinking about upgrading our NT4-clients to XP in the near future and I want to know how well XP is supported by SAMBA in the recent samba-versions. I found many single statements in usenet, but I wonder if there is a kind of XP-FAQ out there. (The one at samba-page is very outdated) Especially I need to know how well XP integrates in a existing NT4-domain (samba as PDC). Then I need

I'm just migrating a medium sambainstallation from old samba2.2.8 to new samba 3.0. The server is acting as PDC and there is no BDC. The new samba is based on LDAP and is already successfully tested. Now I need to transfer the whole old smbpasswd to the new ldap-style to convert users and machines with minimal effort. Especially I dont want to break the relations between the machines and

I'm just migrating a whole samba-installations ffrom old 2.2 to 3.0 with LDAP. I was successfully able to migrate all useraccounts with smbldap-useradd but now I'm stuck with the machine-accounts. All machines are part of the domain and they should be able to logon the new server without noticing any difference. I can add them with smbldap-useradd -w but the resulting ldap-entry does

while looking for a solution for webbased access to our samba-servers I found a recommendation towards using DAV instead. I just took a first glance at DAV (www.webdav.org) and find it very interesting. Are there any documentes comparing these two strategies in intranet and internet (speed, reliability ...) I would also be greatly interested if anyone here uses DAV to allow roaming users to

By now we had running samba as PDC and fileserver for about 20 NT4-clients with roaming profiles. Now we start migrating NT4-clients to XP-clients and as I found out roaming userprofiles between XP and NT4 is not possible (NT4->XP works, but not vice versa). So I just thought about cloning all the profiles (docs and mails are not in the profiles so only bookmarks, adressbook and

Hi, plese have you some idea for this problem? thanks, Lukas -- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:09:59 +0200 (CEST) From: extmaillist at linuxbox.cz To: pilsl at goldfisch.at, Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE Cc: samba at lists.samba.org X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (), 4 required Subject: Re: [Samba] user cannot logon to domain although log says "auth

Hi I actually had this same problem when running up samba originally. Check that the user has a valid unix acount and that you have added that to the folder share/valid users section. B -----Original Message----- From: Tony Ricker [mailto:rickera2@SLU.EDU] Sent: Friday, 15 March 2002 5:21 AM To: David Brodbeck Cc: Samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Some users can't log in -- server shows

A productional system (linux) running samba 2.2.5 runs 'cracy' from yesterday. There are lot of 'odd' behaviours. People cant logon or cant logoff. Access to files fails. Examining the logs the most eyecatching events are: (not that the keynumber started at 959 and went slowly down. I did not wait until it goes to zero and let the user reboot its machine before) Any idea ? thnx,

I'm using samba 2.2.3a as fileserver and domaincontroller for 12 NT4-clients (sp6a) and occassionally - when a user tries to logon - there comes the following messages on the nt-client: - No Windows NT Domain Controller is available for domain XXXX. There are currently no logonservers available to service the logonrequest. - and - server-side profile not available. The OS tries to log you on

We use rsync a lot to backup various stuff over bigger distances and its my project to look deeper into this backups to optimize backup. While its easy to make rsync print the size of the files it is transferring I didnt figure out how to determine how much bytes are actually transferred per file which is even more interesting. If I sync a whole data-structure with 100.000 files lets assume 1000

I use to sync several servers with rsync for years now. One strange thing I still havent figured out: while rsync does its job perfectly will, it cant refuse to transfer all files with "index.html" in it, even if the files havent change. example: the following files are the same for years, but every night rsync copies them again:

When syncing huge data-folders (~50GB) with a remote server on a daily base I frequently (every 2nd to 3rd time) get the following error: Read from remote host goldfisch.at: Connection timed out rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes: phase "unknown" [generator]: Broken pipe (32) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1099) rsync error:

Is there a trick to copy files via smbfs and keep uid/gid/permissions? Usually uid/gid/permission of a transfered file depends on the uid used when mounting the remote share. But maybe there is a trick/patch whatever ... background: I'd like to use a linux-based NAS to backup loads of files *including their permissions and uid/gid*. The NAS supports NFS (which can do what I want) but the

I have a very strange problem and I'm doomed. In a samba-domain with XP-clients certain users cannot logon to some computers. The user tries to logon but *immediately* gets the message "you cant get logged on. please check username and domain and retype your password" (translated from german) on the XP-machine. In the samba-logs (Loglevel=2) it says: [2009/05/19 16:47:16, 2]

Hello, I try to exectute a command on my NT server from my unix server with the following command : smbclient \\\\monnet01\\C$ -U admin_nan -c "help.exe" C$ is my share admin_nan is the user Smbclient doesn't ask a password so i get the following error message : Anonymous login successful Domain=[FR-MON] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0] tree connect failed: ERRDOS

still trying to solve my domain-problems (from time to time I get 'domain controller cant be found' on a special sambaserver 2.2.3a) Why does samba complain about wrong password for user nobody ? I actually found "nobody" in smbpasswd, but I'm not sure if I put it in there and dont understand why nobody needs to be samba-user. imho nobody is the unix-account under which

Hi, I am trying to install gee on our server but I get the error below. I do not have root on this machine so no control on how R was installed itself. It looks like it cannot find blas libs, the only ones i can find on the machine are: /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3 -> libblas.so.3.0.3 /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3.0 -> libblas.so.3.0.3 /usr/lib64/libblas.so.3.0.3 and : $ R CMD config BLAS_LIBS

I've got Redhat 6.2 kernel 2.2.18 and have been running samba 2.07. When I try to configure samba 2.2.0, the configure bombs out with an error ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe with what I think relevant lines from the configure output are: checking for Linux kernel oplocks... no checking for fcntl locking... no Is there something I have to enable in the Kernel for

Well you won't find them shouting about it, but if you dig down in their web pages on Solaris 9 you'll find this : "Common Linux applications, such as Samba, Apache, Linux (GNU) commands, etc., are included in the Solaris 9 Operating Environment. The Solaris Software Companion CD has an even more comprehensive set of free software." So I guess that means we made it onto the OS