similar to: Redirector timeout error with samba 2.09 and NT WTS

I'm running NT 4.0 Terminal Server (Service Pack 4) with Citrix MetaFrame 1.8 on a PC, and Samba 2.0.3 on an HP-UX box. We've been having occasional problems with files not saving correctly, and also with files not unzipping or copying correctly. I suspect it's some sort of incompatibility between Samba and Terminal Server/Metaframe and/or SP4. For

Hi. I am running SAMBA 2.0.7 on HP-UX 11.00 and HP-UX 10.20. I have tried adding the MultipleUsersOnConnection registry key onto my Microsoft Windows NT Server 4 Terminal Server Edition servers, running with Service Pack 6. After I make this change in the registry and reboot my WTS servers all my samba connections from the servers are still being made with one process instead of being split

Running samba 2.06 on Solaris 2.6 and CIFS/9000 on HPUX11. Accessing from NT 4.0 Terminal server. We are seeing the following symptoms. Can anyone offer any diagnostic advice... Users will connect to samba servers and be working along ok. Without warning, the connection starts to act flaky. e.g. can't save documents, file system browsing becomes very erratic. A quick "ps | grep

I've got a Wildcard T100P along with a Zhone Zplex 10 24S/O which has been working fine for me now for a while. These have been pulled out of a working Asterisk installation (as they were no longer required) to use at home only to find that the fan noise is too loud. As such I'm looking to sell off this hardware and replace it with some combination of fanless hardware that will allow me to

Hello, As I mentionned in a previous mail, I cannot connect to Samba 1.9.18p7 using a basic dos redirector and security set to user. I works with share security level or with the full dos redirector which takes 90 k more precious memory ... I got a answer telling me that the dos basic redirector is a piece of ... because it always encrypt the password, even if instructed to use plain text ...

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c268c72e77eb82acd082eed5b1ccf341 kmod-spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.x86_64.rpm 2d7522f13423c046574e79f47b3fdf2f

> It turns out that the MS Network Client for DOS Basic Redirector _always_ > sends a 24 byte password. So, I guessed at encryption, got 'libdes', > recompiled my smbd (again), found a 'spare' Silicon Graphics server and > installed Encryption on it. (ENCRYPTION.txt is very good). Yep, good guess. All encrypted passwords in SMB are 24 bytes long. The "basic

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 1468f8b5a570b76cf202d7890d0b5dab kmod-spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.i386.rpm 27073b872577aa31c7229702cd0c118c spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.i386.rpm

Hi, I've the following error when I want to create a conditionnal redirector in samba 4 : " server complex operation 'IpValidate' not implemented  " Version : Version 4.6.7-Ubuntu Not using bind9 but Samba 4 DNS internal Must I user bind 9 ? My goal is to create un approbation between AD2016 et samba 4. Regard -- *Hervé* *HÉNOCH* *Responsable informatique* Tél. :

If you have the need to implement 5 asterisk boxes each one handling only 100 ulaw calls (same dialplan,etc.) logging to a six MYSQL server , what do you use in *front* of the asterisks? Codecs, hardware,etc is not important. The thing that Im trying to figure out is how do I present the asterisk servers to a bunch of phones and/or FXStoSIP boxes. a sip proxy is not the solution because the sip

Gregory Hosler <greg@camelot.eno.ericsson.se> wrote: > Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. > Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In > the event log I see messages like: > > The redirector has times out a request to <server name> > > This did not used to happen.

I am running samba 1.9.18p3 on Solaris 2.5.1 The clients are NT 4.0 sp3 Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In the event log I see messages like: The redirector has times out a request to <server name> This did not used to happen. This is very puzzling,

thubert@nv.blm.gov wrote: > > Since installing 2.0.3 on an AIX platform and using the PDC for > authentication, our BDC logs are filling up with the following error: > > "The redirector received an SMB that was too short" > > Our smb.conf is minimal in nature and we are unsure where to search for > the problems or solution. I have fixed this in the 2.0.4

Hi, I am running Samba 2.0.4b under Solaris 2.5.1 on a SPARC20. I have several NT users accessing the system and a few are getting redirect errors. Under the event viewer, NT reports "The redirector received an SMB that was too short." The errors occur upon accessing the file system. It's a new one on me and I'm not sure where to begin troubleshooting. Any ideas? Thanks.

Hi Folks, I was wondering if anybody else on this list is using, or trying to use, Samba (esp. on an IBM mainframe) as a print server in a Citrix Metaframe environment, or are we the first? We're getting one or two odd problems... Metaframe is creating the printers on our Samba server as "Client" printers, rather that connecting to them direct. We can connect and print fine from

Hi. Im trying to get cups-printing to work on samba 3.0 - RH9. We are having NT WTS Metaframe servers as the "client" But when running command cupsaddsmb -U root -a -v i get the following error: Warning: No PPD file for printer "printername" - skipping! I have copied over theese files to \usr\share\cups\drivers before running the command [Windows NT, 2000,

Every once in a while a user cannot connect to one of two samba servers. Most of the time (but not always), if he waits 15 minutes to an hour, he can connect successfully. Sometimes he can connect to one server, but not the other, which have the same configuration. We are using authentication from the NT server. Samba version 2.0.3 The messages in the log file are are shown below. In this

I have recently played with and did get a working copy of Asterisk functioning in the lab environment. Then when I moved it out of the lab and onto the outside of our firewall it functions as before except that I get a Connected to Asterisk CVS-08/21/04-12:16:04 currently running on 63 (pid = 1478) ??? -- Starting Skinny session from ??.???.114.131 (PIX (6.3) our firewall) Aug 26 14:48:34

Hello, I'm new to this list. The NT folk here, are concerned about some timeout errors and stuff that appear in their event viewer. They are building a case to convince management that unless these "samba" errors are fixed, we should move to NT file shares. I think this is a bad idea. Can anyone help me out here. We are running samba 2.0.6 (1st msg) and 2.0.5a (2nd err msg)

"H-disk" share is " /home/%U/disk" User1 H: ---------> /home/user1/disk (h-disk) User2 H: ----------> /home/user2/disk (h-disk) When User1 opens a file "H:Øfoo.doc" and then User2 opens a file on this share with the _same_ name ("H:Øfoo.doc") we get from Word (office programs?): "Foo.doc already opened by another user". When user1