similar to: Samba Speed Issues and Information

You said: | I've a question... I use the following smb.conf but when I change the Win95 | client to have user profiles, several folders and the user.dat file is | created in the users home directory instead of the profile share... Er, it seems to be a feature: the man page now says -- logon home (G) This parameter specifies the home directory location when a Win95/98 or NT

Mick Cranston found an interesting and useful converse to my "add -browse to Solaris automounts" comment: He had mapped | a drive (for example g:) from my pc to \\sambasrv\net, then clicked on g: | in Explorer, Explorer would take 10-20 minutes to come back. Plus it was | eating my server alive because it was making all the NFS mounts possible | in /net. This is related to my

Let me guess. You accessing your server like : \\servername\netlogon of \\servername\sysvol Well thats protected by windows these these days. Try with \\servername.domain.tld\netlogon or \\servername.domain.tld\sysvol Does that work? Yes, There is a whole chaper of this on the list somewhere.. Best is to read howto override this. https://adsecurity.org/?p=1405 and for you

Now that I have a working kvm setup, I thought I'd finally try how Zimbra works. This is mainly some microbenchmarking, so it may not have much to do with actual performance in real life. Setup: - 1GB memory given to kvm (from host's 2GB) - Intel Core 2 6600 (kvm uses only one CPU) - CentOS 5 - 15GB qcow2 image on XFS filesystem - Zimbra 5.0 RC2 RHEL5 x86_64 - Dovecot latest hg,

Hey, I have installed Ubuntu 8.10 with FV mode. I use this server for web server (command line mode only, no X window) So should I hack my current installation into a PV mode for production use? In fact, any min. performanc gain suppose I should get? (Any bechmark?) Thanks. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

2015-06-08 13:09 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net>: > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 10:13 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > -ATTRS{idVendor}=="06da", ENV{UPOWER_VENDOR}="Liebert" > > > > +ATTRS{idVendor}=="06da", ENV{UPOWER_VENDOR}="Phoenixtec Power Co., Ltd" > > I'm guessing this would require changes in NUT, so I

Jason Haar <Jason.Haar@trimble.co.nz> wrote: | Well I've just had a crash last night, and I've copies the log files off. | But I see nothing to suggest what happened. Also I've enabled core-dumps, | and no core dump exits, even though smbd died... | | If you look at the smb.conf file, you'll see I've put in a HUGE sleep | statement to be called via "panic

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:47:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > So you need to build a different kernel for some types of MIPS systems? Yes. We can't really do without. Classic MIPS code is not relocatable without the complexity of PIC code as used by ELF DSOs - and their performanc penalty. Plus we have a number of architecture revisions ovr the decades, big and little endian, 32

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:47:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > So you need to build a different kernel for some types of MIPS systems? Yes. We can't really do without. Classic MIPS code is not relocatable without the complexity of PIC code as used by ELF DSOs - and their performanc penalty. Plus we have a number of architecture revisions ovr the decades, big and little endian, 32

Here are my (little) view regarding shares accesses. I write that to clarify things. And it could really be of-topic as Louis seems to have gave solution. There are 2 levels of authorisation for accessing shares: the share level and FS level. For Sysvol I would keep everyone or replace it by "authenticated users" in paranoid mode as the latter refuse non-authenticated users. They are

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of Asterisk 11.2.0. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 11.2.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following is a sample of the issues resolved in this

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of Asterisk 1.8.20.0. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 1.8.20.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following is a sample of the issues resolved in this

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of Asterisk 10.12.0. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 10.12.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following is a sample of the issues resolved in this

On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 13:21 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > 2015-06-08 13:09 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net>: > > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 10:13 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > -ATTRS{idVendor}=="06da", ENV{UPOWER_VENDOR}="Liebert" > > > > > > +ATTRS{idVendor}=="06da",

This question isn't directly Samba related, but Samba has helped me figure out part of the problem. When I CreateFile on an existing file like so: CreateFile(FileName, GENERIC_READ, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_DELETE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL); Samba shows that I have the file opened with this type of lock DENY_NONE 0x20089 RDONLY When the file is locked in

Hi, I have been considering a purchase of the linksys spa3102 for a couple hours but I would like to know from someone here, wether this device will support faxing on my local asterisk server, I have had success sending and recieving faces with an x100p, and recall that in the old documentation, they mention that if I send/recieve faxes, that it all should be done on the local server for best

I have a Solaris 11 build server with build 58 and a zfs scratch filesystem. When trying to upgrade to build 63 using liveupgrade I get the following upon reboot. The machine never comes up. Just keeps giving the error/warning below. Is there something I am doing wrong? WARNING: /ssm at 0,0/pci at 1c,600000/scsi at 1 (mpt0): Received invalid reply frame address 0x480 WARNING: /ssm at

Hello together, well since I'm close to the despair with my problem I wanna describe it here and maybe anyone has a good idea. As the subject already told you I'm trying to connect from a MS-DOS Client to my Samba Server. I'm running a smbd 2.0.5a on a AMD K6-III machine which has two IBM 16.8 GB IDE drives and is connected to over a 3com 3c905b with 100Mb to a fullduplex hub. So far I

On 17/11/15 16:57, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Thanks for replying. It seems you're describing the situation on the > AD DC. Computer and user mode access to my DC works fine and without > any issues but I can't access the shares of my *member* server *in > computer mode*. In user mode, it all works just fine. > > Viktor > > On 17.11.2015

Hai Viktor, > > Before posting my share permissions, can you please elaborate what you > mean with "have you removed authenticated users from your share"? I > never had any rights for "authenticated users" on any of my shares. Ah sorry, yes, that was "everybody" ( my error ) keep it > > Maybe I'm setting up shares in the wrong way? >