similar to: Muilti Homed - Multi subneted Environments.

Hi * I have a question about windows network browsing from linux box in a multi-subneted network. I have such network topology: my subnet is 10.105.27.224/27, there are 10 boxes in my subnet; also there are several other subnets - 10.105.27.0/27, 10.105.27.96/27, ..., 172.17.51.64/27, ..., 172.17.48.0/26, ... In our network we have one wins server with ip 172.17.48.13 that very likely configured

Hello, everybody! I have two networks (192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0) connected across a wireless router with two NICs. I can ping everything allright via ip address, but not by name across subnets. Things on the same subnet ping allright by name. Here are the smb.conf files for my two master browsers: #(192.168.1.249) [global] workgroup = THEBAND netbios name = Yesteryear

(sorry for my english) Hi, I'm a Network Admin and I've a BIG problem... I start the SMB services, but, one moment later... it's stopped... The NMB service are allright... I've the version 2.0.6... and I'm going crazy... If someone can helpme.... Jordi Solis _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN

Hello, When my Samba is the local master browser, it doesn't appear in the Network Neighborhood of the client. There is only the client itself. When the client (Windows NT 4 Workstation) is the local master, the Network Neighborhood shows the only two nodes that I have on my test network, ie the Samba server and the NT 4 Workstation. For the browsing, I use the default

Hi, I have a Samsung printer(ML-2010) connect to my centos 4.2 machine by usb. I want to share this printer with 3 windowsXP mchines in my LAN. Although i have install driver for the printer on all machines, use samba to share the printer, from the windows machine i still have an error"access denied, can not connect to printer" or something similar. In Security Level, i have checked

I have setup a small office of 6 win95/98 workstations and a Samba share (SuSE, Samba 2.0.6) on a P90 with 32MB of RAM and 2, 2GB HD?s. File sharing and PDC functions work perfectly (better than any NT machine). However, I cannot get the samba computer to show up in network neighborhood. I set the netbios name to SAMBA and wins = yes. When I go to start => run and type <\\samba>, the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I had a working 2.0.6 samba on a RH6.2 system with a 2.4.14 kernel. Clients are all win98/win95 except a win/me laptop. I recently upgraded to 2.2.3a ( from source) and since then I cannot see any of the clients in the "network neighborhood". I cannot even see the workgroup under the "entire network". All clents are

ok I finally got 2.0.6 up and running, much thanks to those who helped. currently I have it set up on a 166, with a 2gig drive running suse6.0 with kernel version 2.0.36. I am using an NT PDC, with samba authenticating via the server. a few things. For some reason periodically when I browse the server my home directory will not show up. now that i think I may be logging in as guest but why

I''ll step back to Xen stable, because of my network probs with Xen unstable. So I configured and compiled Xen 2.0.6, but I came to the following error after starting Xend: Exception starting xend: ''module'' object has no attribute ''VIRQ_DOM_EXC'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line 302,

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:44 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 17/05/2020 23:10, Michael Jones wrote: > > Why? > Amongst others, you may get: > > Slow / Failed logins > Replication issues > Group policy access issues > login script issues > > A multi-homed DC (for whatever reason) is a bad idea. > > Rowland > I

Hi, we've got a strange problem with "case sensitive = yes" using 2.0.5a with Win95/98 clients: Directorys directly below the share seem to be empty, if the dirname is lowercase !!? Below uppercase dirs everything is allright and the probem doesn't exist with NT4.0. If we choose "case sensitive = no" everything is allright. (with exeption of the problems we have

I have Samba 2.0.6.3 (or is it 6.5?) running on a SuSE 6.2 system. I currently have three Windows 95/98 clients attached to my linux machine, which is a firewall/gateway to the internet via cable modem. When I was using Samba 1.-something, I was able to print to the printer on the linux box from two of the three Windows 95 machines on the network. Since I upgraded to 2.0.6, I haven't been

On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 1:43 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 17/05/2020 19:30, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > as I am currently planning a network with Samba AD DC I was wondering if > > you can recommend any best practice for a multi-homed AD DC. > > Best practise is: do not multi-home a DC. >

Dear all, as I am currently planning a network with Samba AD DC I was wondering if you can recommend any best practice for a multi-homed AD DC. My current plan is to have one NIC for Samba services and a second one dedicated to management functions (e.g. SSH) on a separate network restricted to admin users. In a testbed scenario I already discovered that once both adapters exist, samba seems to

Hi, I connected a multi-homed Win95 machine (carrot, see below) to two networks (ankh-net and morpork-net) which a multi-homed Linux machine running Samba 1.9.18p10 (or whatever the latest <2 is) was also connected to (vimes) and wanted to see which of the two interfaces Win95 would pick... --------------------------------- ankh-net 134.225.241.0/24 | |

>From a security standpoint, if the default keytab (/etc/krb5.keytab) contains only ONE principal, does it matter if GSSAPIStrictAcceptorCheck is set to "yes" or "no"? My company uses an internally built OpenSSH package that includes the GSSAPI Key Exchange patch. Because we have 1000s of hosts, we need to use a "standard" sshd_config file that works for the

Hey all, I'm experiencing a problem with chan_sip on a multi-homed machine. The machine has 1 interface to the rest of the world and 1 interface on a local network. The local network has public IP-addresses, though, and the IP-addresses of both interfaces are reachable from the outside world, but by default, outgoing traffic from that machine to the outside world will have the IP-address of

I tried to implement a multi-homed box using this faq 4.2.1 split access http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html But it says table is invalid. Can someone tell me what the difference is in Centos? I assume the FAQ is leaving out how to add tables to the iproute files? I am trying to have eth0 and eth1 service two different subnets for apache and not act as a

On 17/05/2020 19:30, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > Dear all, > > as I am currently planning a network with Samba AD DC I was wondering if > you can recommend any best practice for a multi-homed AD DC. Best practise is: do not multi-home a DC. Rowland

Hi, (I think I posted this a few weeks ago, but I haven't found the solution and had no replies.) I have a multi-homed server, one interface of which is on the same subnet as the majority of clients and the other is on a different one (but still reachable, through a router). When connecting to the server, it seems to be chance which one of these interfaces I get. I believe DNS servers