similar to: [2.0.7pre1] PDC.ACADIAU.CA rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[2.0.7pre1] PDC.ACADIAU.CA rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER."

2000 Feb 08
1
[2.0.7pre1] --with-utmp enabled ...
Under Solaris 7/sparc, I get: Compiling smbd/connection.c smbd/connection.c:381: conflicting types for `utmp_yield' smbd/connection.c:30: previous declaration of `utmp_yield' 381 has 'int pid', while 30 has 'pid_t pid' ... I changed 381 to reflect 30 and she continues on its way ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems
2000 Feb 08
0
[2.0.7pre1] found 'server = domain' directive ...
But, following the instructions, I get: eris:/usr/slocal/samba/bin> ./smbpasswd -j ACADIA -r pdc.acadiau.ca attempt_netbios_session_request: PDC.ACADIAU.CA rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER. Segmentation fault GDB shows: eris:/usr/slocal/samba/bin> gdb !$ core gdb smbpasswd core GNU gdb 4.17 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU
1999 Jun 03
0
Security related bug/issue ... or mis-configuration? (fwd)
As a followup to my own email... We did some testing here today with connecting to the share from an NT box, where we connect to \\relay\marc as marc when log'd in as a seperate user...NT refuses to allow it. Is there a bug with the server that, using smbclient from Linux, allows you to connect to any share without a password? Can someone test this and see if its a local problem or not?
2001 Mar 30
1
session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present)
Hi, I am trying to list the shares on a windows ME machine and I am getting the following [root]# smbclient -L 192.168.0.253 added interface ip=192.168.0.1 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 session request to 192.168.0.253 failed (Called name not present) session request to 192 failed (Called name not present) session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present) I have also tried
2007 Jul 18
0
session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Call returned zero bytes (EOF))
Samba running on Aix 5.2 =96 system rebooted due to power problem and = since then samba server is not working Prior to the power problem, all was well. So, I assume that the smb.conf = is still fine. Ran smbclient =96L hostname=20 =20 session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Call returned zero bytes (EOF)) =20 netstat =96a show netbios udp is listening =20 Since, it was working before, I
1999 Oct 18
0
session request to *SMBSERVER failed
I am having a problem with samba on a Sun Ultra running Solaris 2.6. I got the error: -- session request to WWW20 failed session request to *SMBSERVER failed -- This happened after a reboot, samba was running perfect before. The smb.conf is fine, it was tested on another server and worked. Netstat -a shows that it is listening on port 139. Any ideas? Thanks. ## ignore the Lycos
2001 Nov 15
1
session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Not listening for calling name)
can someone please tell me how to troubleshoot this (i didn't find anything informative in the log files)? if (duane.douglas) { technologies = asp && php && cgi_perl && cold fusion && xml && xsl && xsd && sql server && mysql && javascript }
2002 Oct 10
1
session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present).
Hi all, I have a Solaris 2.7 host with a recent install of samba-2.2.2. I am using an smb.conf from a simmilar host that works perfectly. I can't seem to connect to the host with Samba. I am getting: ########## //g4syd/usr/local/samba/bin 634 # smbclient -d 4 -L g4syd added interface ip=10.1.5.7 bcast=10.1.5.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Client started (version 2.2.2). resolve_hosts: Attempting
1999 May 11
1
Security related bug/issue ... or mis-configuration?
Morning... Attached are two files. The first (smb.session) shows one user connecting to two different shares on a remote server using *no* password... The second is the smb.conf file found on that remote server, running Solaris 2.6, and Samba 2.0.3 ... I'm *really* hoping that its something that we're overlooking as far as configuration is concerned...or else there is one helluva
1999 Sep 14
0
session setup rejected by PDC and BDCs (NT4 SP5)
Hi, I?ve setup a Samba 2.0.5a on a SuSe 6.2 based Linux 2.2.10. I?m trying to integrate the server into our NT domain SF-DOM as described in samba/textdocs/DOMAIN_MEMBER.txt . The described procedures work, but access as domain user is impossible. In the logfile I get: [1999/09/14 11:18:31, 2] smbd/server.c:main(716) Changed root to / [1999/09/14 11:18:31, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96)
1998 Apr 09
0
Problem with "password server" setup. What is *SMBSERVER?
I have Samba 1.9.18p3 running under Solaris 2.6. I'm trying to use my sites PDC (running under NT) as the password server for this installation. For the most part this is working correctly. However, I have a few users that have changed their NT/Novell (We run Novell Intranetware) passwords and found that they could no longer access Samba drives off the Solaris box. Experimenting found that
2000 May 01
0
*SMBSERVER name query to Samba server
Hello, I am working on developing yet another pam module that uses the SMB dialect for authenticating user id/passwords with an SMB server (OS/2 Warp Server, NT, Samba, AIX, etc.). The code is essentially built on top of portions of Samba 2.0.6 release code. The code uses the get_dc_list() routine (source/libsmb/namequery.c) introduced in 2.0.6. to allow the client to discover the DC to
2004 Feb 16
0
Only browsing and net view \\smbserver fails with unassigned share names :(
Dear Samba List, I'm having a browsing problem with W2k on my 2.0.9 Samba server and now you are my last hope to help me solving my problem. Not working is access from Win2k Clients: "net view \\ixdp425" is the first test that fails, not meaning to terminate with error, but to produce the following unexpected output: Name Typ Lokal Beschreibung (Description)
1999 Jun 29
1
Linux vs NT: a new test
Don't know how many ppl saw/read the following: http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266,00.html One of the comments on Slashdot was the question as to how well 4.4lite would have done in the same tests, as they "theorize" that alot of the problems revolve around Linux's IP stack... Now if only we had a working MMAP, we'd be all set... Marc G. Fournier
1998 Dec 07
1
two questions: mailing list & public shares
Morning... First off, is there a non-digest version of this list available? Second, and more important, from reading the docs, the following 'share' should not prompt me for a password...no? # This one is useful for people to share files [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = no public = yes If this is correct, then there is a problem here, since I
1998 Aug 25
2
/etc/printcap for samba-shared printer...
Morning... Just spent this evening getting printing setup off my FreeBSD machine (oh, how I love Solaris at these times *groan*)...got it now so that I can print directly from Netscape, color and graphics and all. The printer is an HP 560c. Now, I want to be able to print from my Windoze95 machine, and have samba setup for that, as well as file sharing. If I setup my Windoze machine such
1999 Dec 13
3
Comments request to refute arguments about Samba...
I can't answer any of this, but the following was taken from a thread on the "Novell Technology Transfer Partners List <NOVTTP@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>" and passed over to me by my boss... Any comments/refutations/etc most definitely accepted... Please note that *I'm* the Senior Unix Systems Administrator at the University I work at, and have been moving us towards Samba since I
1999 Nov 05
4
Purely numeric service name
Hi I have a problem accessing NT boxes which have a service (host) name which is purely numeric, smbclient insists on treating it as an ip number. For example:- /opt/samba/bin/smbclient \\\\06842\\BACKUP xxxxx -U xxxxx returns :- Connecting to 0.0.14.34 at port 139 Connection to 06842 failed I am using HPUX 10.2 and samba version 2.0.4b. Surely it should be possible to connect to NT
2008 Jun 06
1
limit user connections to PDC
i work in a lab environment, and we'd like to prevent users from logging into 5 machines at once. I've looked through the smb.conf man page pretty thoroughly, but nothing appears to address this problem. Anyone have any ideas, how you can limit the amount of logins a user can have to teh domain? Thanks, Chris
2006 Mar 10
0
Session management changed in EdgeRails?
Hi, I''ve been developing an application in Rails 1.0 and finally made the switch to Edge for has_many :through and polymorphism. I''m currently storing the authenticated user object (User model) in the session. This has worked well up until upgrading to EdgeRails. What I do is set @user = session[:user] in my controllers and then access the various @user associations such as