Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "File timestamp different between SAMBA server and SAMBA client!"
1999 May 25
0
unable to log on to server/SAMBA Digest 2101
> From: "Stephen L Arnold" <sarnold@coyote.rain.org>
>
> On 22 May 99, <khoogc@singnet.com.sg> had questions about unable to
> log on to server:
>
> > 2. Server is a RH5.2 with shadow passwd and samba-2.0.3 and has the line
> >
> > 192.168.0.1 orchid.khoo.lgl orchid
> >
> > in /etc/hosts
>
> Does the RH box connect
2003 Oct 12
2
INFO method and DTMF translation
Hello guys,
I have searched high and low, but not found any information about
rules of using DTMF in SIP INFO method. Cisco has described something with
Signal=, but it look like this feature is dependent on implementors?
The problem is chan_sip.c cannot correctly translate received DTMF
digits, especially #,*. At least with my Antek EGW-804 gateway.
Looking into chan_sip.c, I found this code:
2004 Apr 17
3
Couldnot open MS power point from Samba share
Hi every one,
i have the problem opening MS Powerpoint 97 from samba share. the ms ppt
always shows:
<file name> is not correct
where the file name is manged.
i tried to disable manged name in samba, but the problem still happens
thank you for advice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
1999 Jan 28
0
win95 & NT4 concurent access to paradox database
Hi,
I use samba for one year only, but with full satisfaction. Only with
latest cvs tree I discovered some (maybe particular) problem. In mixed
environment of win95oemII and NT4 workst (sp3 or sp4) we share some
Paradox 7.0 database on linux server (Rh5.2 and 2.2.0-pre1 kernel).
Paradox controls multiuser access to the data with three files:
PDOXUSRS.NET (user names etc?), and two lock files,
2017 Mar 14
0
Rsyncing without RSH or SSH ?
Rsh should be pretty easy to do. I don't think it has changed since
before RH5.2 vintage.
Otherwise, your best bet would be NFS. I think RH5.2 is new enough for
NFSv3 but I don't remember for sure.
Alternatively maybe you know someone with a newer SCSI controller. I
have several PCI ones and even a PCI-X one I haven't used in years.
On 03/14/2017 12:30 AM, Philip Rhoades via
1999 Apr 04
0
(Fwd) Samba and win9x woes
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
From: Self <scc>
To: vanlug@gweep.bc.ca
Subject: Samba and win9x woes
Send reply to: help@pdscc.com
Date sent: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 01:45:09 -0800
Okay was with a client tonight setting up and edge router
http://edge.fireplug.net and samba stuff and had a few problems.
Samba is the stock one with RH5.2 (1.9.18
1998 Dec 16
2
NT domains and 1.9.18pSomething
Hi,
I'm trying to replace an NT SBS box with a RH5.2 box, and
things are proceeding quite well, save a few samba troubles.
I've found that the NT4WS (SP4) clients can log in if told
to use a samba machine as a "workgroup", but that they can
not find a domain controller if told to use "domain" logons.
(They have the registry password encryption hack installed.)
2000 Feb 08
2
installing online help (PR#423)
When I attempt to install the online help for R.99 on Intel RH5.2, I
get the following message
Substitution loop at /usr/local/src/R/etc/Rdconvlib.pl line 1589, <rdfile> chunk 171
and it stops after a few files. Each time I rerun it, it gets a bit
further and gives a different number at the end. I commented out the
line 1589 and it works.
2000 Feb 08
2
installing online help (PR#423)
When I attempt to install the online help for R.99 on Intel RH5.2, I
get the following message
Substitution loop at /usr/local/src/R/etc/Rdconvlib.pl line 1589, <rdfile> chunk 171
and it stops after a few files. Each time I rerun it, it gets a bit
further and gives a different number at the end. I commented out the
line 1589 and it works.
1999 Mar 18
2
e1071 and netpbm
Having compiled and successfully installed e1071 on a previous machine
(and run under 0.62.4) I want to compile it on a new machine to run under
0.63.3 but the loader can't find netpbm - both machined are RH5.2 Linux
installations.
I have some quite old netpbm's on a CD but none more recent and I
certainly didn't install them on my old machine. I can't locate or rpm -q
or rpm
1999 Mar 18
2
e1071 and netpbm
Having compiled and successfully installed e1071 on a previous machine
(and run under 0.62.4) I want to compile it on a new machine to run under
0.63.3 but the loader can't find netpbm - both machined are RH5.2 Linux
installations.
I have some quite old netpbm's on a CD but none more recent and I
certainly didn't install them on my old machine. I can't locate or rpm -q
or rpm
1999 May 11
1
model.matrix crashes (PR#189)
With 0.64.1 on Intel RH5.2,
abc <- list()
abc$abc$abc <- matrix(1:20)
mt <- terms(~(abc$abc$abc[,1]==64)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==65)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==75)
|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==84)|(abc$abc$abc[,1]==85))
model.matrix(mt,model.frame(mt))
crashes. With ab$ab$ab, it does not. Apparently, the bug I reported
for 0.64.0 has just been pushed back one step. Jim
1999 Nov 29
1
rbind crash (PR#351)
Well here is my (first) segmentation fault for this version (R0.90.0)
on Intel RH5.2:
x <- matrix(0,nrow=1,ncol=3)
y <- c(0.1,10,0.01)
rbind(x,y)
Jim
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the
1999 Dec 17
1
lists of functions (PR#377)
The following works:
list(function() 1, function() 2)
but this does not:
z <- list()
zz[[1]] <- function() 1
giving an "incompatible types" error.
The second procedure works with other types of objects.
Intel RH5.2 with R90.1.
Jim
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read
1999 Nov 24
2
scan error (PR#342)
It seems to me the following should work (in fact, it comes from
someone's SPlus file). Instead, it reads the first 8 lines and then
spits out syntax errors. Using nlines=36 works. Using nmax does not.
Intel RH5.2 with R90.0. Debugging shows it must be internal. Jim
junk <- scan(file="",list(i=0,r1=0,r2=0,lull="",day=""),n=5*36)
1 3 5 no 1
2 1
2000 Jan 25
1
core dump involving function closure (PR#402)
A user has crashed R90.1 on MS Windows by succesive calls to two of my
formula/function interpretors in an order that I had not foreseen. I
have checked and this also occurs with Intel RH5.2. I have distilled
the problem down to its bare bones as the following set of
instructions:
func <- function(.mu){
.ch1 <- deparse(.mu,width=500)[-1]
.fn <-
1999 Nov 16
3
Inf in expression (PR#326)
I was getting worried. 0.65 is the first version that I had not been
able to crash. Well the following gives a seg fault on Intel RH5.2
with R0.65.1:
plot(rnorm(20),xlab=expression(mu[Inf]))
You can guess what I was trying to do, as I used infty first and that
did not work. (I now know the correct formula.)
Jim
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
2017 Mar 14
4
Rsyncing without RSH or SSH ?
People,
This doesn't seem possible - would it be possible to hack a version of
rsync to do it?
As an exercise, I want to create a VM image (or at least backup of all
the files with rsync) from a SCSI drive in an old Red Hat (NOT
Enterprise) v5.2 Linux 486 machine (circa 1999 that does have rsync on
it but it has protocol problems talking my server). The 486 has:
- an ISA Adaptec 1542
2004 Apr 16
1
Another domain browse problem
Hi.
We have two networks, one on Windows 2000 and another in SAMBA.
I can browse the windows domain but they can't. They don't even see the
domain.
My smb.conf includes
Domain master = Yes
Preferred master = Yes
Domain logons = Yes
Does windows domain need to have a well working dns server?
Cheers,
Rafael
1999 Jan 12
4
RH5.2 bundle
Hello and Happy New R
Two points:
1 Noting the existence of 0.63.2 as a tgz file on CRAN, but being careful
or lazy depending on how you want to see it, I also note that the binaries
for Redhat stop at 0.63.1 on RH 5.1.
I recently got the RH 5.2 Power Tools where I was pleased to see R 0.62.4
included, lots of libraries including V&R. This had been compiled into an
rpm - does anyone know