similar to: UNSUBSCIBE SAMBA

unsubscribe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3594 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190218/40bc1e09/attachment.bin>

At 16:58 23/07/99 +1000, you wrote: > SAMBA Digest 2177 > >For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) rookie needs help > by "Page, Jon T" <Jon.Page@pnl.gov> > 2) genrand.c > by Mark_Noel@cch.com > 3) Wincenter 3.1.13/Winframe 1.7 - ACLs: > by Hanns-Peter Ermert

Hi, Frankly spoken you have a real RTFM problem. The manual pages for smb.conf say that "create mask" and "create mode" are equal. It also says that there is only a "force XXXX mode" (where XXXX is either create or directory). So a replacement of mask with mode will do the thing. The other mistake is that there is no "force create group" parameter. The

Hello Brian, There is a very annoying problem with UNIX systems and network printing. On nearly all SYSV systems the spooler stores only the address of the (temporarily) print file. This does not cause any problem if it is created by a local application. If the temporarily print file was created via a network application (Samba, NFS, etc.) it will be removed shortly afterwards. In the most

Jens Rieck wrote: >>Can anyone help me? >> >>I have Samba 2.0.5a running on SuSE Linux 6.0 (2.0.36) and >>Windows NT Server 4.0 SP4 (PDC). >> >>When I try to do a "smbclient -L MYUNIX" (according to the trouble >>shooting guide) I get the following message: >> >>Addes interface ip=195.90.254.xxx bcast=195.90.254.255

I have problems with one Windows NT. I installed Samba 2.0.2, but that did not helped. Kari Hurtta wrote: >Actually situation gone worst. Adding > nt support = no >halped somewhat (new problems seems disappeared). >That new errors was that printing try caused >that NT reported about IO-errors. >I just want indicate that special nt support >code perhaps have some

Hello, I have a strange problem with Samba 2.04b and M$ Outlook97 on NT 4.0 SP4. I am using a SCO OpenServer 5.04 system as mailserver (POP3) and nameserver as well as Samba Server. For backup reasons I have installed Outlook in such a way that its own mail file (postfach.pst) is on the Samba share. If the NT box and Outlook are freshly started I can retrieve mails from the POP3 or send

Massimo Lambertini wrote: >I have a big problem . >I'he upgrade my Server from ( Linux 2.0.36 and Samba 1.19 ) to >Linux 2.2.7 and Samba 2.0.3 ( redhat 6.0 ). >I have used the same smb.conf but the systen do not work the same . >I have a linux directory shared by 10 users with M$ Office 97 . >With Old System ( Samba 1.19) when i open a file from one client if i >try

Denis Caron wrote: >>We seem to be experiencing some problems with Samba 2.0.6 on SCO Unix >>Openserver 5.0.5. >> >>I'm wondering if anybody else is using this version of Samba on SCO. I used >>an older version 3 years ago and rarely had a problem. I just installed this >>version and am experiencing an annoying problem: >> >>We use

When the world was much younger, Stephen L Arnold <arnold.steve@ensco.com> painted some strange hieroglyphs like this: >When the world was young, Axel Neumann <amn@cromemco.com> carved >some runes like this: >> I just want to inform you about a severe problem that I have >> found with Samba 2.0.5 installed on a SCO OpenServer 5.04. >[snip] >> INTERNAL

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:45:02 +0000 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Just what do you mean by 'allow no connections' ?? where from ? how? ivory:~ wynkoop$ smbclient -L prd2 Receiving SMB: Server stopped responding protocol negotiation failed ivory:~ wynkoop$ and on the server with the samba-tool built config I have these samba related processes:

On 17 May 99, Axel Neumann <amn@cromemco.com> had questions about DOS to UNIX Conversion: > It seems that a lot of people hate Windoze in such a way that they only > accept solutions that are not coming from M$. Maybe that's because the M$ "solutions" are crap, and much better alternatives already exist. > If you want to view UNIX text files correctly on a W9x

Arnaud Quette wrote: > Anyhow, I would more see this as a merge of all these drivers, with > some autodetection or flag/param to switch the mfr/model and maybe > capabilities... Whatever the driver name is, a good thing would be the > name of the protocol or something generic enough, though powermust is > fine. Ok, I made some minor changes to powermust, to make it less

Why is www.secnet.com down ? i'm looking for the samba-audit-tool and didn't find any mirror. Thomas On Fri, 30 Apr 1999 samba@samba.org wrote: > SAMBA Digest 2073 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Group-Shares > by Johannes Scherbaum <scherj@funkhaus.de> >

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:49:28 -0800 Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: winbind trusted domains only = yes > > > > server services = rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, > > winbind, nt p_signd, kcc, smb > > Remove 'smb' from this line. In fact, remove this line > completely. Where did you find docs telling you to add > this

( I thought I sent this message out before, but never saw it in the digests ) Configuration : Windows NT 4.0 clients printing to Samba 1.9.18p8 running on Solaris 2.6/2.51 machines. The Samba servers are setup like this : ... security = server password server = %m encrypt passwords = yes networkstation user login = no ... So the server uses the

I reported the problem two months ago . I knew this would happen . :(( 2016-09-17 22:42 GMT+03:00 Edson Tadeu Almeida da Silveira via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>: > Sorry, the problem came back, after 3 hours. > > att, > > 2016-09-17 13:11 GMT-03:00 Edson Tadeu Almeida da Silveira < > edson.tadeu at gmail.com>: > > > I don't know if it is a

Hello everyone, I'm having a problem with the replication of the Active Directory from a Windows Server 2003 r2 DC to a Samba 4.1.6 (Ubuntu 14.04) DC. The problem we have is that the *memberOf* attribute is missing on two users in the Samba ldap database after adding them to a group on the Windows DC. I can't easily add these through a Ldap administration tool and can't add them to

Sorry, the problem came back, after 3 hours. att, 2016-09-17 13:11 GMT-03:00 Edson Tadeu Almeida da Silveira < edson.tadeu at gmail.com>: > I don't know if it is a coincidence, but, after add "dead time = 10" in my > smb.conf, my server is about 1 hour without increase de number of > processes... > > tks! > > > 2016-09-17 12:49 GMT-03:00 Jeremy

Hi, Sorry for the forwarding. I sent this with the wrong "from" address and got rejected by the list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at mail.telepac.pt> Date: Jun 18, 2007 9:34 PM Subject: Re: Megatec - modem control lines [impact to megatec_usb] To: Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> Cc: ups-dev-list <nut-upsdev at