similar to: Samba and BackupExec

I would like to add a rule allowing only the address 192.168.150.20 and the range of addresses from 192.169.150.100 to 192.168.150.150 in zone dmz0 to connect to two terminal servers in the local zone. Is there a syntax that can specify a range of addresses in the rules file? Do I have to enter each one separately? -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator DPSI 6033 W.Century Blvd.

Is there an improved BackupExec Unix agent available that works with Samba? If not, can someone tell me how to work around the lack of the archive bit that Linux has? In particular, RedHat Linux 7.2 is the system I'm looking for help on. I found the following hints in an older version of this newsletter, Samba Digest, Vol. 3, Issue 34, sent March 21, 2003, that had this in it: Yes, we have

If you can see the server, but not shares, you most likely have not published any directories. What version of the BE agent are you using? I've noticed 4.6 works well (the install actually works well and will walk you through the setup to publish the directories to be backed up). It's often easier to just publish root (but exclude /proc /tmp). Also, I've found out that in the hosts

Is it possible to allow two Linux computers to browse each other in a manner similar to the way a winbox and browse a Linux box with Samba? Ya know, like the network neighborhood thing, not the smbclient get put thing? Thanks

Hi, my problem is to access a shared printer with samba on my WindowsXP workstation When I browse thru my network with Explorer, I can see the shared printer. When I double-clic on the printer, Windows XP ask me if I want to install it. I choose the right driver and click "OK". The installation begin and there is no error in the installation. After the installation Windows XP open the

I have registered a project with Sourceforge to produced a Webmin module for Shorewall. http://sourceforge.net/projects/webmin-shorewal/ Anyone interested in participating please email me at enemyofthestate at users.sourceforge.net I am still learning the interface but I think I need your Sourceforge Nym to add you as a developer. -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator

Hi, I'm having a minor issue with swat on red hat 7.2. It won't let me make any changes to the samba server (adding shares, printers, and global definitions). The buttons to access these simply don't exist. I can view status, but I can't make any changes (not even restart the daemons). This works fine on my Debian system. The only real difference that I can think of is inetd

I have the following interfaces loc eth0 net0 eth1 net1 eth2 (net0 and net1 are the two ISP networks) policy loc net0 ACCEPT loc net1 ACCEPT net0 all DROP info proxyarp 209.189.103.204 eth0 eth1 no no params Pellucidar=192.168.124.232 rules DNAT net0 loc:$Pellucidar tcp 22,80,1950,50005 - 209.189.103.204 ACCEPT all all icmp

I''m having another little problem with my new firewall. I want outgoing port 25 from my mail server to appear on the address 65.223.121.227 so I created the file masq: eth2 192.168.124.18 65.223.121.227 tcp 25 eth1 eth5 eth1 eth3 eth1 eth4 eth1 == net0 == 209.189.103.196/27 eth2 == net1 == 65.223.121.237/28 eth3 == dmz0 eth4 == dmz1 eth5 == loc ==

Hi, Does anyone have experience with BackupExec and Samba? BackupExec refuse to access Samba shares. Windows shares are OK, but all my Samba shares are not. I have Samba on at least 2 Linux 2.4 machines + 1 on Solaris. Neither ones work with BExec. Any idea? Other have experience with BExec and Samba? Thanks a lot -jec _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Jean-Eric Cuendet

I am using Samba 3.0.20a with winbindd on FC3 and all the shares except one are working. I keep getting a permison denied error for non-local users in certain directories. The permissions on the directory are # ls -ld . drwxr-xr-x 11 procman users 4096 Aug 3 15:35 . # ls -l drwxrwx--- 12 procman admin 4096 Aug 2 15:47 administration drwxrwx--- 5 procman data-entry 4096 Nov 16

I have a pretty straightforward shorewall (v 2.0.12) setup in my Phoenix office. IP addresses on the firewall eth0 172.16.10.249 eth1 12.47.198.100 eth1:1 12.47.198.108 eth1:2 12.47.198.101 eth2 172.16.11.249 interfaces: loc eth0 detect net eth1 detect blacklist dmz eth2 detect vpn1 tun1 192.168.124.255 zones net Net

I am looking at terminating a OpenVPN tunnel on my shorewall box, but selectivly forward incoming traffic from the VPN tunnel to various hosts on my LOC-zone. Is this doable? Or need I set up OpenVPN tunnels that terminates on the LOC-hosts in question directly? (Or rather: Which page on the web site have I neglected to read _this_ time?) Happy new year to one and all! .

I am migrating from my "old" 2.2.7 samba server to a newer server runnig 3.0.20a and everythig is working except the [homes] share. The server (FILE-CABINET) is a member of the domain, security is set to ADS and, as far as I can tell, kerberos is working. The program wbinfo returns a list of users and groups like it should. getent passwd returns first my local passwd file and then

on i have a small question we have a linux box with a windows 2003 server well we natted all the ports and mail is working remote desktop is working web is working the only thing that does not work is vpn how can i foward vpn traffic to this server i checked the site and searched for foward vpn and got nothen can somone please enlight me where to start Marshal McInnis Tech / Web

Hi, I hope this is the right list to submit this request to I have the following problem with samba 2.2.2 that I upgraded to samba 2.2.7 to try to see if the problem would go away. But I still have the following problem: When I open the Start->Settings->Printers window It shows the printers that I have connected to from the samba print server

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Over the past weekend, I added SPF screening on the MTA at shorewall.net. SPF is a mechanism for a domain to use DNS to publish a list of those IP addresses that are used to send legitimate email from that domain. A receiving MTA can use that published information to determine if email from a domain is being sent through an MTA belonging to that

Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > I have an entire /8 blacklisted. The problem is there is a single IP in > it I want to exempt from this. Searching the web site, I note there > used to be (circa version 1.3) a whitelist feature, but I couldn''t find > a simple solution to what I want to do. > > What would be the bes/easiest way to accomplish this? I can''t think of a

Hi Franck, to my knowledge, the Backup Exec service "runs" under a certain user. In most cases it is the user who installed it, so very often "Administrator". Now if you try to backup a Samba share, Backup Exec tries to retrieve the files of this share and has to authenticate to the Samba Server. I suspect it will do this with the "credentials" of the user the Backup

Hi, I'm searching for 2 months on this problem (I've searched in the archive of course and I've sent a message on this mailing list, the suggestions had helped me but I didn't manage to resolve the problem). The problem: ------------ I've got Samba 2.0.2 on a Linux Red Hat 5.2 and a server NT4 SP3 with Seagate BackupExec 7.0. When I want to backup Samba with Seagate