similar to: Samba 2.0.3 and NT Terminal Server SP4/MetaFrame 1.8

I found a post from a year ago which matches my current situation almost exactly, except that we are using samba 2.09. Anyone resolve this yet? Here's the previous text... *********************************** I'm running NT 4.0 Terminal Server (Service Pack 4) with Citrix MetaFrame 1.8 on a PC, and Samba 2.0.3 on an HP-UX box. We've been having occasional problems with files not

Hi, Is it possible to use samba with Citrix Metaframe to allow Unix users running Windows applications and having access to their unix directories? I'd like to know if there is no problem of authentication and permissions. Thanks in advance Benoit.

Hi Folks, I was wondering if anybody else on this list is using, or trying to use, Samba (esp. on an IBM mainframe) as a print server in a Citrix Metaframe environment, or are we the first? We're getting one or two odd problems... Metaframe is creating the printers on our Samba server as "Client" printers, rather that connecting to them direct. We can connect and print fine from

Troy, This does work in the security=domain situations (This is what I am currently using in my smb.conf). You do not need to do anything special for joining the doman when using the aliases. Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:15:44 -0600 From: "Troy.A Johnson" <troy.johnson@health.state.mn.us> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Subject: [Samba] security=domain and Citrix MetaFrame on

I am running Citrix Metaframe XP on Windows 2000 server and would like to have the ability to access files on my AIX Unix server. Are there any issues with Samba in a Windows Terminal Server environment? Thanks, Tim Brooks

I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no avail. (Like this one http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) What I would like to see in such a FAQ/HOWTO: - Compilation issues regarding Citrix/metaframe - - ie the need to increase the MAX_CONNECTION setting before compilation - - ie how to compile samba to a 64 bit application to get more available file

I have recently played with and did get a working copy of Asterisk functioning in the lab environment. Then when I moved it out of the lab and onto the outside of our firewall it functions as before except that I get a Connected to Asterisk CVS-08/21/04-12:16:04 currently running on 63 (pid = 1478) ??? -- Starting Skinny session from ??.???.114.131 (PIX (6.3) our firewall) Aug 26 14:48:34

Does this work for: security = domain situations? Do you have to do anything special with regard to joining the domain. >>> <Drew.Zeller@statcan.ca> 11/27/02 09:16AM >>> I saw your postings and thought I would through in my two cents for the Windows 2000 Terminal Server and Samba. The MultipleUsersOnConnection does not seem to work in Windows 2000 version of Terminal

Hello, at this time we're using s. 2.2.8a (running on SuSE-Linux StandardServer 8 - Kernel 2.4.21) as fileserver for our terminal server environment. We ran into the 128 connections per client limitation and had to modify the MAX_CONNECTIONS-parameter in smbd/conn.c. Now we're planning the migration from s. 2.2.8a to s. 3.0.1. Is the modification in smbd/conn.c still necessary, when using

"H-disk" share is " /home/%U/disk" User1 H: ---------> /home/user1/disk (h-disk) User2 H: ----------> /home/user2/disk (h-disk) When User1 opens a file "H:Øfoo.doc" and then User2 opens a file on this share with the _same_ name ("H:Øfoo.doc") we get from Word (office programs?): "Foo.doc already opened by another user". When user1

I just attempted to upgrade from Samba 1.9.18p10 to Samba 2.0.4b, and I have had to revert to 1.9.18p10 in less than a day. I attempted to upgrade to 2.0.1 back in January, and had to back off as well. I was hoping the problems I saw then would be resolved in 2.0.4b. I sent a message to this list back in January or February as well, but saw no responses. My environment is about 210 Win95 PCs

To start with, I'd like to praise the entire Samba Team, Samba 2.2.3.a compiled and installed perfected. I wish all vendors could do that good of job. Great documentation too! KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK. Now that the "cheese" is over with... I posted a problem the other day concerning the funtionality between Outlook XP .PST files and Samba 2.2.2 & 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.6 As it

Hi All I have a Win2K server with Citrix Metaframe XPe installed on the network and uses mapped network drives to a Samba file server. The Citrix server is locking users out of the mapped network drive on the samba server. Citrix has 125 concurrent licences and Terminal services licences of the same amount Samba version is 2.2.3a Running on a Redhat 7.3 box. Please advise if more into is

Citrix Web client lets me login to the Metaframe server, but when I try to launch an application, I get a message that I cannot connect to the server. I must have 128-bit SSL support installed. . . . I'm using Firefox 1.5 as a browser and I can log into my bank, which requires the 128 bit SSL, so somewhere between logging into the Citrix server and trying to launch an application,

Please help, We've searched high and low for a solution, but nothing. We're upgrading our Office 2000 to Office XP on Metaframe 1.8/NT TSE. We use a Samba 2.0.7 and 2.2.2 on Solaris 2.6 and 2.8 respectively. Both are disallowing the user to write to their outlook.pst file. What's more, we can compact the PST file, but ONLY OUTSIDE of outlook (example, right clicking on properties

Hello, I am unable to do a graceful shutdown or reboot of SLES 10 SP4 virtual machines (Kernel version: 2.6.16.60-0.85.1-default) with virsh shutdown or virsh reboot commands. (e.g virsh shutdown "vmname" ). On issuing these commands there is no impact on the VM. Also unable to perform the shutdown or reboot operations from the menu options available on the console when accessing the

I've been experiencing an incredibly slow samba access from a Win2k SP4 client to a Linux samba server (Mandrake 9.0, samba 2.2.8a). It seems like the file transfer rate is not so slow, but the initial opening of files on the Linux samba server takes very long (10 ~ 20 seconds). The directory listing is also very slow. In the past, it took me about 2.5 hours to compile Mozilla-Windows

Hi all. Scenario: Fedora Core 2 Samba 3.0.6 PDC with ldap Exchange 5.5 on Win2K SP4 Whenever a try to install Exchange SP4 I run in to a situation similar to the one reported in bugzilla's bug 1076 (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1076 ) and to this http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-November/001828.html Also found this on another list: ----- Begin quote ------------

We are trying to install a 32-bit SLES9-SP4 paravirtual machine on a 64-bit SLES10-SP1 Dom0 host from scratch. We have two problems: 1. The YaST2 VM creation tool fails to create a vm if a network card is selected. 2. The initial vm boots from the SLES9-SP4 iso file, but then complains it can''t find the installation source. Here is the /etc/xen/vm/file (after manually editing for a

Samba Masters: I installed SP4 on a NT 4.0 workstation and now it cannot connect to any samba shares. I reran the NT4_PlainPassword.reg script but that did not fix the problem. Your suggestions / flames would be appreciated. Thank You **************************************************************** Leo Crombach System / Network Administrator Tropel Corporation Phone: (716) 388-3566 60