similar to: How to install network apps?

I know this is off-topic to the list, but someone asked me to make the information that I garnered about Dell Poweredge systems available to the list. So, here it is. Basically, after a search on dejanews, I came across this article: http://x5.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=430135686&CONTEXT=917266543.1696071777&hitnum=19 In it, someone states that there are drivers for the PERC RAID

Hey everyone, I'm having some strange responses, and a bit of trouble with getting access to a member server on my domain. I've got Samba running on another Linux box as a PDC, and my Win2k clients can login just fine, and share between one another. The problem comes in with another Linux workstation that's setup as a member server. Here's the relevant smb.conf section from the

Dear list, I am trying to create a three-way table with percent occurrence instead of raw frequencies. However, I cannot get the results I expected: I have the following table: > ftable(table( mannerDF$agem, mannerDF$target, mannerDF$manner )) <snip> 50 bak 0 0 0 0 1 0 pak 0 0 0 0 3 0 sak

Has anyone seen this: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedded/sak/evaluation/compare/advantage.asp And has anyone from the Samba team posted a response? It seems like some of the information presented there is contrary to what I know about Samba. ERX

Hi all, Sorry to bother you with the potentially not too bright question, but since I cannot get it to work, I'll have to ask someone.. I've got this vector: > token [1] sal skal skal bak b_r d_ gal kal l_r n_r pak p_r [13] sal sl_r sn_r spak sp_r st_r s_ bak d_ gal l_r pak [25] p_r sak sl_r sp_r t_ kal n_r s_ st_r sak kal

When the world was young, "Alain FAUCONNET" <af@biomath.jussieu.fr> carved some runes like this: [snip] > So what ? unless the nice people who manage those lists can find the > time to switch to a better list processor like Majordomo, all we can do > is asking people : > > - not to send any multipart mails : > * do copy/paste logs or config files inline,

In my continued attempt to get winbindd working on a simple domain, I decided to go through the documentation in more detail, searching for some possibly hidden clues. In doing so I came across some instruction that left me a little confused... Fast Start: Cure for Impatience - Domain Member Server http://us2.samba.org/samba/docs/man/howto/FastStart.html#id2512775 The first point is in the

When we rebooted our NT PDC (I was on vacation) they had the following error message: "A primary domain controller is already running in this domain." I do not want any Samba boxes to act as PDC to the domain, but use either the true NT PDC or the NT BDC for authentication. If either box cannot be located, than just act as another NT workstation. I have included the global section of

I have not found any Samba documentation explaining using DNS for name resolution. We are running a name server on the network which was set up for several reasons. I find our DNS server is faster, more reliable and doesn't generate mangled machine names like our NT WINS server, which can't be edited. This doesn't happen with DNS since the names are all entered statically. We have

I'm running FreeBSD 3.0-current and have just upgraded samba to 2.0.0. Previously, I used unencrypted passwords. After upgrading, they didn't work so I changed to use encrypted ones. I can now map my drives from the PC. However, I still have a number of problems that I think are all related. - I can't use swat. The authentication always fails. I get a message on the console

Hi I have a problem accessing NT boxes which have a service (host) name which is purely numeric, smbclient insists on treating it as an ip number. For example:- /opt/samba/bin/smbclient \\\\06842\\BACKUP xxxxx -U xxxxx returns :- Connecting to 0.0.14.34 at port 139 Connection to 06842 failed I am using HPUX 10.2 and samba version 2.0.4b. Surely it should be possible to connect to NT

Hopefully this is a samba question, and not a Microsoft Access question... I have a multiuser access database on a samba share... it worked fine with multiple users being able to connect to it at the same time no probs. I just upgraded the linux box to red hat 6, copied across the same smb.conf from before and now users are getting a error "Too many active users" when more than one

Greetings All: I hope everyone had a fun Halloween weekend (I carved 4 big pumpkins and gave out a bucket full of rubber eyeballs and stuff). I'm hoping somebody can explain the password behavior I've been seeing (and a couple of other things). Here's my setup: An isolated LAN (most clients have modems for dialling out) with one linux/samba machine (RedHat 4.2, kernel 2.0.30,

I am currently investigating using samba on a Linux box to provide file server services on our NT LAN (I'm a bit sick of NT doing dummy spits on me). I'm running RH5.1, and have just upgraded samba to samba-1.9.18p8-51.3 (using the rpm from http://samba.anu.edu.au/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/redhat/RPMS/5.1/samba- 1.9.18p8-51.3.i386.rpm) The setup includes several NT servers, one set up as

I can't seem to make the fax detection work. Here's an excerpt from zapata.conf: signalling=fxs_ks group=0 context => guestaccess channel => 47-48 and from extensions.conf: [guestaccess] include => incomingmain [incomingmain] exten => s,1,Dial,Zap/1&Zap/9&Zap/10&Zap/11|24 exten => s,2,Voicemail,u7000 exten =>

Okay... seems I still cannot get anything working right with this as far getting it to print. Here is the three different files which I would like all to look at and see what I have screwed up since it refuses to print. Here is the setup of the network: HP 5L connected to Win95 - 192.168.0.1 Linux - Zeus - 192.168.0.3 -----------SMB.CONF FILE------------ ; /etc/smb.conf [global] printing =

Hello: In the process of migration from version 1.2 to 2.0 have tried to use lmtp instead of lda as delivery agent. But unfortunately througput we get is poor with lmtp compared to lda. In peak times with lda we are able to deliver over 1800 messages/minute (high I/O but not affecting service) but if we switch to lmtp cannot deliver more than 300 mess/minute (very low I/O). This is enough

I tried upgrading from samba 1.9 to 2.0 on two seperate RedHat servers, and after both upgrades nobody could get authenticated. The windows boxes had the registry hacks to turn off encrypted passwords, and I'm authenticating out of passwd+shadow. I found many similiar posts on DejaNews and in the samba mailing list archives. I broke out strace and found the problem. Samba 2.0 tries to

I would like to see those of us who send an inquiry to this list also send a summary of what fixed the problem so that someone in the future could find the answer. I searched archives for an answer and only found questions. Since a lot of folks reply ot individuals then even the replies don't end up in the archives and so it would be nice if summaries were sent to the list. Anyway, enough

Please answer if anybody has solved this problem: [1999/07/19 20:59:41, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are available. Thanks in advance.