similar to: Redirector error with 2.0.3 running on AIX (PR#15924)

I am sure this is not a problem, but more of a "can we do this" question. We are using Samba Version 2.0.6 and my problem is this: We have one Samba server for a site, we NFS mount filesystems from various other machines to the Samba server, we then create a directory on the Samba server and then create links under that directory to each of the mounted filesystems we want to share.

Hello, As I mentionned in a previous mail, I cannot connect to Samba 1.9.18p7 using a basic dos redirector and security set to user. I works with share security level or with the full dos redirector which takes 90 k more precious memory ... I got a answer telling me that the dos basic redirector is a piece of ... because it always encrypt the password, even if instructed to use plain text ...

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c268c72e77eb82acd082eed5b1ccf341 kmod-spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.x86_64.rpm 2d7522f13423c046574e79f47b3fdf2f

> It turns out that the MS Network Client for DOS Basic Redirector _always_ > sends a 24 byte password. So, I guessed at encryption, got 'libdes', > recompiled my smbd (again), found a 'spare' Silicon Graphics server and > installed Encryption on it. (ENCRYPTION.txt is very good). Yep, good guess. All encrypted passwords in SMB are 24 bytes long. The "basic

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 1468f8b5a570b76cf202d7890d0b5dab kmod-spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.i386.rpm 27073b872577aa31c7229702cd0c118c spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.i386.rpm

If you have the need to implement 5 asterisk boxes each one handling only 100 ulaw calls (same dialplan,etc.) logging to a six MYSQL server , what do you use in *front* of the asterisks? Codecs, hardware,etc is not important. The thing that Im trying to figure out is how do I present the asterisk servers to a bunch of phones and/or FXStoSIP boxes. a sip proxy is not the solution because the sip

Hi, I've the following error when I want to create a conditionnal redirector in samba 4 : " server complex operation 'IpValidate' not implemented  " Version : Version 4.6.7-Ubuntu Not using bind9 but Samba 4 DNS internal Must I user bind 9 ? My goal is to create un approbation between AD2016 et samba 4. Regard -- *Hervé* *HÉNOCH* *Responsable informatique* Tél. :

Gregory Hosler <greg@camelot.eno.ericsson.se> wrote: > Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. > Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In > the event log I see messages like: > > The redirector has times out a request to <server name> > > This did not used to happen.

I am running samba 1.9.18p3 on Solaris 2.5.1 The clients are NT 4.0 sp3 Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In the event log I see messages like: The redirector has times out a request to <server name> This did not used to happen. This is very puzzling,

Hi, I am running Samba 2.0.4b under Solaris 2.5.1 on a SPARC20. I have several NT users accessing the system and a few are getting redirect errors. Under the event viewer, NT reports "The redirector received an SMB that was too short." The errors occur upon accessing the file system. It's a new one on me and I'm not sure where to begin troubleshooting. Any ideas? Thanks.

I found a post from a year ago which matches my current situation almost exactly, except that we are using samba 2.09. Anyone resolve this yet? Here's the previous text... *********************************** I'm running NT 4.0 Terminal Server (Service Pack 4) with Citrix MetaFrame 1.8 on a PC, and Samba 2.0.3 on an HP-UX box. We've been having occasional problems with files not

Hi All: For whatever reason I can not get dns caching to work on any of my centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig using itself as the resolver the queries fail (See below). Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ed [root at qmail ~]# ps -aux | grep pdns-recursor Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a

> In a lattice plot like this: > > win.graph() > xyplot(tmx~frequ|as.factor(as.numeric(spf)),groups=as.factor(blm), > data=tmx,type="l",pch=16,xlab="frequency (N)",ylab="Area held (ha)", > auto.key=list(blm,points=F,lines=T,title="Blm factor",cex.title=0.7, > cex=0.7,corner=c(1,1)),main="Mangroves target=1573ha",layout=c(2,3))

On 11/22/2016 3:50 PM, Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote: > When you go to the Dell Linux site and choose shop now you are taken to a page featuring Windows 10 machines. [OT rant] a pet peeve... webpile redesigns that mess everything up. I was looking for info on the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) website last night, and they'd totally redone the entire mess, it was all slick and web 3.0-ish,

Hello, Is there a way to upgrade my current ZFS version. I show the version could be as high as 22. I tried the command below. It seems that you can only upgrade by upgrade the OS release. [ilmcoso0vs056:root] / # zpool upgrade -V 16 tank invalid version ''16'' usage: upgrade upgrade -v upgrade [-V version] <-a | pool ...> [ilmcoso0vs056:root] /

"Beast" is more appropriate than you know. It''s definately Frankenstein code. (read: it ain''t pretty, but it works - some of the time). Anyway, it entertains my wife; not sure if hardcore programmers will get anything out of it or not. You might find it interesting (or pointless) that in a complete bastardization of rails'' main reason for being it

On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 00:06, Jules Colding wrote: > -----Forwarded Message----- > > From: Park_Richard@blm.gov > > To: Jules Colding <jules@tdcadsl.dk> > > Cc: Samba <samba@lists.samba.org>, > > samba-bounces+prichard=blm.gov@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Invisible samba server > > Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:55:29 -0600 > > >

> > Hello Heinz, > > > > Am 13.03.2015 um 18:26 schrieb Heinz H?lzl: > > > i did some tests wit samba 4.2 as a ADS DC on arch linux. > > > On a Win8.1 client i can do local logins as every user, > > > i can login via RDP as local user, but i am not able to > > > login as a domain user via RDP. > > > After the loginscreen, appears

Hi, On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Heinz H?lzl wrote: >>> Hello Heinz, >>> >>> Am 13.03.2015 um 18:26 schrieb Heinz H?lzl: >>>> i did some tests wit samba 4.2 as a ADS DC on arch linux. >>>> On a Win8.1 client i can do local logins as every user, >>>> i can login via RDP as local user, but i am not able to >>>> login as a domain

> Hello Heinz, > > Am 13.03.2015 um 18:26 schrieb Heinz H?lzl: > > i did some tests wit samba 4.2 as a ADS DC on arch linux. > > On a Win8.1 client i can do local logins as every user, > > i can login via RDP as local user, but i am not able to > > login as a domain user via RDP. > > After the loginscreen, appears "Welcome" and the > >