similar to: Win NT with Samba 2.0.x

Hi, Frankly spoken you have a real RTFM problem. The manual pages for smb.conf say that "create mask" and "create mode" are equal. It also says that there is only a "force XXXX mode" (where XXXX is either create or directory). So a replacement of mask with mode will do the thing. The other mistake is that there is no "force create group" parameter. The

Hello Brian, There is a very annoying problem with UNIX systems and network printing. On nearly all SYSV systems the spooler stores only the address of the (temporarily) print file. This does not cause any problem if it is created by a local application. If the temporarily print file was created via a network application (Samba, NFS, etc.) it will be removed shortly afterwards. In the most

Jens Rieck wrote: >>Can anyone help me? >> >>I have Samba 2.0.5a running on SuSE Linux 6.0 (2.0.36) and >>Windows NT Server 4.0 SP4 (PDC). >> >>When I try to do a "smbclient -L MYUNIX" (according to the trouble >>shooting guide) I get the following message: >> >>Addes interface ip=195.90.254.xxx bcast=195.90.254.255

Hello, I have a strange problem with Samba 2.04b and M$ Outlook97 on NT 4.0 SP4. I am using a SCO OpenServer 5.04 system as mailserver (POP3) and nameserver as well as Samba Server. For backup reasons I have installed Outlook in such a way that its own mail file (postfach.pst) is on the Samba share. If the NT box and Outlook are freshly started I can retrieve mails from the POP3 or send

Massimo Lambertini wrote: >I have a big problem . >I'he upgrade my Server from ( Linux 2.0.36 and Samba 1.19 ) to >Linux 2.2.7 and Samba 2.0.3 ( redhat 6.0 ). >I have used the same smb.conf but the systen do not work the same . >I have a linux directory shared by 10 users with M$ Office 97 . >With Old System ( Samba 1.19) when i open a file from one client if i >try

Denis Caron wrote: >>We seem to be experiencing some problems with Samba 2.0.6 on SCO Unix >>Openserver 5.0.5. >> >>I'm wondering if anybody else is using this version of Samba on SCO. I used >>an older version 3 years ago and rarely had a problem. I just installed this >>version and am experiencing an annoying problem: >> >>We use

Hello, I am using Samba 2.0.3 on my FreeBSD 2.2.7 box. Works fine. It is already running for a few months with a small amount of windows95 users and last week we decided to move all our userfiles from our SCO box with visionfs over to the Samba machine. No problems so far. But, strange files are appearing in the directorys of the NT40 workstation users. Under Unix they look like Ne00: or Ne01: or

Why is www.secnet.com down ? i'm looking for the samba-audit-tool and didn't find any mirror. Thomas On Fri, 30 Apr 1999 samba@samba.org wrote: > SAMBA Digest 2073 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Group-Shares > by Johannes Scherbaum <scherj@funkhaus.de> >

Mike Brodbelt wrote: >I'm using Samba 2.0.7, and I've got a small problem hwich has been >annoying me for a while now. My clients are all NT, and print via Samba. >I'm continually getting files like this created:- >/DIRECS/INDIRS/Ne01: >/DIRECS/LONDIRS/Ne01: >/DIRECS/UNDIRS/Ne01: >/DIRECS/Ne01: >Does anyone know why they appear, and how I can get rid of them?

Last 3 wines are failed to compile on various reasons. (If I remember correctly: 20020411 compiles; 20020509, 20020605, 20020710 does not.) wine 20020710 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/hurtta/game/wine-20020710/programs/winetest' gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include `perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e perl_inc` -g -O2 -Wall -fno-strength-reduce -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fPIC

> Sorry for the disturb, I found your post (and your Email) in a wine > mail list http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2002/11/0182.html > > Do you solve that problem????? > > I have the same, please help me!!! > > Best Regards > > Davide Fanizzo > > (sorry for my english) I did not solved it. I use vmware instead. / Kari Hurtta >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, We got the following message on the console of one of our server: ~ HTB: dequeue bug (8,12140714,12140714), report it please ! The server is a Dell Poweredge with 2 CPUs running a 2.5.25 Kernel. It is used as a ppp gateway to server l2tp connections. The iproute2 package has the version [020116]. We set the filters using the handle as

Howdy, Not sure, but it appears that OpenSSH_4.3p1 on solaris creates bad wtmpx entries during login? mgoebel pts/5 Wed Dec 31 19:00 still logged in It is creating entries for Dec 31st 1969. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Goebel : goebel at emunix.emich.edu : Unix Jockey @ EMU : Hail Eris Neo-Student, Net Lurker, Donut consumer, and procrastinating Furry Fan.

-----Original Message----- From: samba@samba.org <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Date: Saturday, July 24, 1999 12:40 PM Subject: SAMBA digest 2178 > SAMBA Digest 2178 > >For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) strange share violation > by

I have a bit of a problem, however, I am not sure if it has been solved, or what. I have: RedHat Linux 7.2 samba version 2.2.1a Client machine is Windows NT 4.0 (Service Pack 5.0) Printer: using an NT driver on an NT machine configured to print to the port-'file'. problem: I am trying to print a file on a samba file server to a "printer". When the file is stored on an

Mike Brodbelt wrote: >Hi, >I'm running Samba 2.0.6 here as our main file server. Authentication is >done against an NT PDC, and Samba is also responsible for printing. >I'm getting some odd files created which aren't being deleted. They are >all zero byte files, named after a network interface, so I assume they >may be temporary files which are not being deleted.

Hi, I'm running Samba 2.0.6 here as our main file server. Authentication is done against an NT PDC, and Samba is also responsible for printing. I'm getting some odd files created which aren't being deleted. They are all zero byte files, named after a network interface, so I assume they may be temporary files which are not being deleted. Here's a list of a few # find

J.A. Gutierrez: > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01BE90ED.FE9FFFA0 > > Hi > > sorry for being so off-topic, but lately I'm seeing lots of > bad MIME messages on this list. > > I guess it's a problem with Microsoft Outlook (or maybe a problem > with the MetaMail I'm using?)

On 17 May 99, Axel Neumann <amn@cromemco.com> had questions about DOS to UNIX Conversion: > It seems that a lot of people hate Windoze in such a way that they only > accept solutions that are not coming from M$. Maybe that's because the M$ "solutions" are crap, and much better alternatives already exist. > If you want to view UNIX text files correctly on a W9x

Hi, #tcsh#machine# gpg --verify openssh-4.1p1.tar.gz.asc openssh-4.1p1.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Wed May 25 08:26:24 2005 EDT using DSA key ID 86FF9C48 gpg: BAD signature from "Damien Miller (Personal Key) <djm at mindrot.org>" I made sure that I had the same key loaded that the signature was made with, but that didn't change the error. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Goebel :