similar to: split file io error (PR#14191)

I got mcp mag a day or two ago, Great writeup!! I was a little surprised that they ran such a glowing review of samba, with some of the negative implications on NT. It is very nice to see Microsoft show an interest in interoperability. -Steve Roylance > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Allison [SMTP:jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 1999 6:41 PM >

TO THE SAMBA TEAM: MAY YOUR TRIBE BE HERE FOREVER! YOU' SIMPLY GREAT BUT i CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY YOU A PIZZA BUT OUR NATIVE PIE "BUKO (YOUNG COCONUT) PIE" IS BETTER! i HAVE BEEN USING SAMBA 1.9.16P9 AND STILL ALRIGHT. PERHAPS I'LL DO CHANGE TO SAMBA 2.0 AND THIS IS A LONG WAY! i DID TRIED SAMBA SINCE MY OFFICE CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY NFS TO SERVE AT LEAST 20 PCs AND

Phillip.Link@alcatel.fr wrote: > The problem > ----------- > I've been trying to install the latest samba distrib (2.0.5a) on a hpux > 10.20 machine, but the connection times out, apparently because of > shared memory access. > > Trying to make an smbclient connection (or using the windows nt explorer > to connect generates the following log.smb (smbd launched as smbd

Jay.Anderson@dw.deere.com wrote: > I believe the problem that occurs is that oplocks are left hanging on > the server, and are never removed. After a period of time, all the > shared memory that is allocated to file locking is filled, and the > server starts sending garbage back to the clients when they request > locks, confusing the clients and creating all sorts of strange

Unknown recipient ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 1:02 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 2158 > SAMBA Digest 2158 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) msaccess and samba prob solved -

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,

Colleagues ---------------------------------- System info: R version rw1020 on NT ESS using emacs ver. 20.4 ---------------------------------- I need to get the means for each column of a dataframe in the list created by splitting a data frame. At present, I am getting the mean of all columns in aggregate. The structure of the unsplit data is: > shuttle.tr1[1:10,] juliandate

Hi, Anyone know where I can get a .tar.gz of 2.0.2? I'd like this version, since the PDC code is reportedly more stable than 2.0.3. Or has this been fixed in 2.0.3? Thanks, -- Seeya, Paul ---- plussier@baynetworks.com Broadband Technology Division - Bay Networks (now a Nortel Company, Eh? :) If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!

Hi, I'm trying to get the latest version of darwine working with slickedit on my mac os x box. Everything is using the latest version. When I try to run my application I get this error: > wine: created the configuration directory '/Users/GMan/.wine' > err:module:DelayLoadFailureHook failed to delay load setupapi.dll.InstallHinfSectionW > wine: Call from 0x7b830f70 to

I'm having a problem using _spawnl and system to run processes on a network drive. If my program runs something like system("unzip -l testfile.zip"), unzip actually looks for testfile.zip in the root of the drive rather than the current directory, although the current directory as returned by _getcwd() and GetCurrentDirectory() are correct. I've tried getting the current

bob@hobbes.dtcc.edu wrote: > > this samba was built on a solaris 2.5 system and was running fine on a > solaris 7 3/99 system. when i installed the solaris 7 5/99 maintenance > update something broke. > > log.smb: > > [1999/08/06 11:04:41, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) > smbd version 2.0.5a started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [1999/08/06 11:36:49,

> Further to my previous post, I have made an interesting discovery. This > particular slowdown only occurs from clients that are running > Windows 98. The Windows98 explorer (and possibly other programs) incorrectly set the "sync" bit in write requests to network shares. This causes an enormous slowdown as Samba (quite correctly) does a fsync() on the file after each write.

Hi All, Sorry to be posting this :-(, but if you're using the 'username map' parameter with Samba 1.9.18p8, here's a small patch you may need. Without it the username map will work once per smbd and then refuse to map subsequent names. This isn't a big problem as normally, on a single user NT or 95 system, username map will only be called once per session (in the

Hi all, Inforworld (that's a rather large computer magazine is the USA) are thinking of doing an article on people using Samba to replace/supplement NT servers in commercial organizations within the USA. I told their editor I'd send out this request for people who fit the following criteria to send in their details : They need people who are : (a). USA Based. (b). Using Samba but

estewart@dudley.lib.usf.edu wrote: > > On an Ultra 1 running Solaris 2.6 and using gcc 2.8.1 > > ipc.c: In function `api_RNetServerEnum': > ipc.c:1194: warning: passing arg 4 of `qsort' from incompatible pointer > type > > Compiling nmbd_incomingrequests.c > nmbd_incomingrequests.c: In function `process_node_status_request': >

Hello, does somebody have a tool to convert a /etc/passwd to a smbpasswd with getting a valid Lan Manager and NT hash. or does anybody have a trick, how I can synchronise the /etc/passwd with the smbpasswd without changing a unix passwd twice (passwd,smbpasswd). Thanks, Martin *********************************************************************** ** Martin Schuster ** Nortel DASA Network

I apologise for not knowing the answer to this, especially as I saw it was discussed on the mailing lists but can't find the original article (even searching the archives). Our support teams would like a single smb.conf that can be used as a default world-wide. (allowing for a minimal modification of the "workgroup=" field) This means that you're stuck for what to put in your

OK, med 19:00 sv tid /Lennart At 13:05 1998-11-07 +1100, you wrote: > SAMBA Digest 1867 > >For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: nis homedir troubles > by Jeremy Allison <jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> > 2) calling all Samba vendors! > by Andrew Tridgell

Uncommented the section on userdb that was commented because it was throwing errors. It?s still throwing an error. Specifically this one: Jan 10 15:42:37 shuttle postfix/smtpd[21046]: connect from pvr[192.168.1.103] Jan 10 15:42:47 shuttle postfix/smtpd[21046]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms Jan 10 15:42:48 shuttle postfix/master[18850]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid

Hi, I'm debating purchasing a NetAppliance fileserver that does native CIFS. Below is a URL to a NetAppliance authored paper regarding performance. One of the sections compares NFS to CIFS and talks about Samba. Can anyone dispute any of this? Is there any reason besides price that I should stick with Samba? -Ed Ed Sanborn (978) 691-6496 Northchurch